The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Epidemiology of Stuttering in the Community Across the Entire Life Span
Abstract
A randomized and stratified investigation was conducted into the epidemiology of stuttering in the community across the entire life span. Persons from households in the state of New South Wales, Australia, were asked to participate in a telephone interview. Consenting persons were given a brief introduction to the research, and details were requested concerning the number and age of the persons living in the household at the time of the interview. Interviewees were then given a description of stuttering. Based on this description, they were asked if any person living in their household stuttered (prevalence). If they answered ‘yes,’ a number of corroborative questions were asked, and permission was requested to tape over the telephone the speech of the person who stutters. Confirmation of stuttering was based on (a) a positive detection of stuttering from the tape and (b) an affirmative answer to at least one of the corroborative questions supporting the diagnosis. Results showed that the prevalence of stuttering over the whole population was 0.72%, with higher prevalence rates in younger children (1.4–1.44) and lowest rates in adolescence (0.53). Male-to-female ratios ranged from 2.3:1 in younger children to 4:1 in adolescence, with a ratio of 2.3:1 across all ages. The household member being interviewed was also asked whether anyone in the household had ever stuttered. If the answer was ‘yes,’ the same corroborative questions were asked. These data, along with the prevalence data, provided an estimate of the incidence or risk of stuttering, which was found to range from 2.1% in adults (21–50 years) to 2.8% in younger children (2–5 years) and 3.4% in older children (6–10 years). Implications of these results are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Epidemiology of stuttering: 21st century advances
Yairi, E., & Ambrose, N. (2013) · Journal of Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.11.002 · Cited by 649
The Impact of Stuttering on the Quality of Life in Adults Who Stutter
Craig, A., Blumgart, E., & Tran, Y. (2009) · Journal of Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2009.05.002 · Cited by 490
Self-citationSocial anxiety disorder in adults who stutter
Blumgart, E., Tran, Y., & Craig, A. (2010) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.20657 · Cited by 262
Self-citationFear of Speaking: Chronic Anxiety and Stammering
Craig, A., & Tran, Y. (2006) · Advances in Psychiatric Treatment · doi:10.1192/apt.12.1.63 · Cited by 117
Australian Normative Data for the Overall Assessment of the Speaker’s Experience of Stuttering
Blumgart, E., Tran, Y., Scott Yaruss, J., & Craig, A. (2012) · Journal of Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2011.12.002 · Cited by 53
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Craig, A., Hancock, K., Tran, Y., Craig, M., & Peters, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1097-1105
- ISSN
- 1092-4388 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-9102
- DOI
- 10.1044/1092-4388(2002/088
- OpenAlex
- W2088249514
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidemiology of Stuttering in the Community Across the Entire Life Span. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1044/1092-4388(2002/088
- The paper
- Craig, A., Hancock, K., Tran, Y., Craig, M., & Peters, K. (2002). Epidemiology of Stuttering in the Community Across the Entire Life Span. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2002/088
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.