The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anxiety Levels in People Who Stutter: A Randomized Population Study
Abstract
The question of whether people who stutter are generally more anxious than people who do not stutter has not yet been resolved. One major methodological barrier to determining whether differences exist has been the type of stuttering sample used. Studies investigating anxiety levels of those who stutter have mostly assessed people referred to stuttering therapy clinics, which is arguably a biased sample. To date, no studies have been published that have measured the anxiety levels of people who stutter in the community using random selection procedures. Such a sample is more likely to be representative of the population of people who stutter. The present study involved a random selection and telephone interview of people in 4,689 households. The telephone respondent was given a description of stuttering and asked if any person living in their household stuttered. If yes, a number of corroborative questions were asked, and permission was requested to tape the speech of the person believed to stutter over the telephone. A definite case of stuttering was based on (a) a positive detection of stuttering from the tape and (b) at least one of the corroborative questions supporting the diagnosis. A total of 87 people were identified as definite cases of stuttering across all ages, and 63 participants who were 15 years or older completed a trait anxiety questionnaire over the telephone. Mean trait anxiety levels were significantly higher than levels generally found in society, though differences were not large. Implications of these results are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adaptation canadienne-française de la forme révisée du State-Trait Anxiety Inventory de Spielberger
Gauthier, J., & Bouchard, S. (1993) · Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement · doi:10.1037/h0078881 · Cited by 407
Anxiety and Social Phobia in Stuttering
Mahr, G. C., & Torosian, T. (1999) · Journal of Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0094-730x(98)00027-8 · Cited by 76
Cited by
The Impact of Stuttering on the Quality of Life in Adults Who Stutter
Craig, A., Blumgart, E., & Tran, Y. (2009) · Journal of Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2009.05.002 · Cited by 490
Self-citationSocial anxiety disorder and stuttering: current status and future directions.
Iverach, L., & Rapee, R. M. (2014) · Journal of Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2013.08.003 · Cited by 337
Social anxiety disorder in adults who stutter
Blumgart, E., Tran, Y., & Craig, A. (2010) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.20657 · Cited by 262
Self-citationThe Relationship between Anxiety and Stuttering: A Multidimensional Approach
Ezrati-Vinacour, R., & Levin, I. (2004) · Journal of Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2004.02.003 · Cited by 193
Social anxiety and the severity and typography of stuttering in adolescents
Mulcahy, K., Hennessey, N., Beilby, J., & Byrnes, M. (2008) · Journal of Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2008.12.002 · Cited by 145
Metadata
- Authors
- Craig, A., Hancock, K., Tran, Y., & Craig, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1197-1206
- ISSN
- 1092-4388 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-9102
- DOI
- 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/093
- OpenAlex
- W2019852285
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anxiety Levels in People Who Stutter: A Randomized Population Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1044/1092-4388(2003/093
- The paper
- Craig, A., Hancock, K., Tran, Y., & Craig, M. (2003). Anxiety Levels in People Who Stutter: A Randomized Population Study. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2003/093
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.