The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Word Learning by Preschoolers With Specific Language Impairment: Effect of Phonological or Semantic Cues
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigated whether phonological or semantic encoding cues promoted better word learning for children with specific language impairment (SLI) and whether this treatment differentially affected children with SLI and normal language (NL). Method: Twenty-four preschoolers ages 4;0 (years;months) to 5;11 with SLI and 24 age- and gender-matched children with NL participated. The between-group factor was language group (NL, SLI) and within-group factors were language modality (comprehension, recognition, production) and treatment condition (phonological, semantic). Word learning was assessed during fast mapping, word learning, and posttesting with trials to criterion calculated for the number of words learned. A drawing task assessed the change in semantic representation of words. Results: The SLI group comprehended more words in the semantic condition and produced more words in the phonological condition, but the NL group performed similarly in both. The NL group required significantly fewer trials than the SLI group to comprehend words in the semantic and phonological conditions and to produce words in the semantic condition, but between-group differences for production were not significant for the phonological condition. Conclusions: The results suggest that preschoolers with SLI may benefit from cues that highlight the phonological or semantic properties of words but that different cues may aid different aspects of word learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonword repetition and child language impairment
Dollaghan, C., & Campbell, T. F. (1998) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jslhr.4105.1136 · Cited by 1,006
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test--Third Edition
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (2012) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t15145-000 · Cited by 813
Cited by
Warren, S. F., Fey, M. E., & Yoder, P. J. (2007) · Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/mrdd.20139 · Cited by 606
Collisson, B. A., Grela, B., Spaulding, T., Rueckl, J. G., & Magnuson, J. S. (2015) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12219 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Gray, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1452-1467
- ISSN
- 1092-4388 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-9102
- DOI
- 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/101
- OpenAlex
- W2024040040
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Word Learning by Preschoolers With Specific Language Impairment: Effect of Phonological or Semantic Cues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1044/1092-4388(2005/101
- The paper
- Gray, S. (2005). Word Learning by Preschoolers With Specific Language Impairment: Effect of Phonological or Semantic Cues. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2005/101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.