The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Impact of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Intervention on the Speech Production of Individuals With Developmental Disabilities: A Research Review
Abstract
Purpose: This article presents the results of a meta-analysis to determine the effect of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities. Method: A comprehensive search of the literature published between 1975 and 2003, which included data on speech production before, during, and after AAC intervention, was conducted using a combination of electronic and hand searches. Results: The review identified 23 studies, involving 67 individuals. Seventeen of these studies did not establish experimental control, thereby limiting the certainty of evidence about speech outcomes. The remaining 6 studies, involving 27 cases, had sufficient methodological rigor for the “best evidence analysis” (cf. R. E. Slavin, 1986). Most of the participants (aged 2–60 years) had mental retardation or autism; the AAC interventions involved instruction in manual signs or nonelectronic aided systems. None of the 27 cases demonstrated decreases in speech production as a result of AAC intervention, 11% showed no change, and the majority (89%) demonstrated gains in speech. For the most part, the gains observed were modest, but these data may underestimate the effect of AAC intervention on speech production because there were ceiling effects. Conclusions: Future research is needed to better delineate the relationship between AAC intervention and speech production across a wider range of participants and AAC interventions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change
Barlow, D. H., Nock, M. K., & Hersen, M. (1976) · Cited by 3,036
Research design in clinical psychology
(1952) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/1097-4679(195201)8:1<3::aid-jclp2270080102>3.0.co;2-0 · Cited by 2,147
Single case experimental designs: Strategieṡ for studying behavior change
Matson, J. L. (1985) · Applied Research in Mental Retardation · doi:10.1016/0270-3092(85)90012-8 · Cited by 1,184
The Quantitative Synthesis of Single-Subject Research: Methodology and Validation
Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. (1987) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/074193258700800206 · Cited by 969
The Handbook of Research Synthesis
Ziegel, E. R., Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. (1995) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269651 · Cited by 927
The Picture Exchange Communication System
Bondy, A. S., & Frost, L. A. (1994) · Focus on Autistic Behavior · doi:10.1177/108835769400900301 · Cited by 903
Best-Evidence Synthesis: An Alternative to Meta-Analytic and Traditional Reviews
Slavin, R. E. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.2307/1174711 · Cited by 698
Research Design in Clinical Psychology
Kazdin, A. E. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108976589 · Cited by 656
Charlop‐Christy, M. H., Carpenter, M., Le, L., LeBlanc, L. A., & Kellet, K. (2002) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.2002.35-213 · Cited by 603
Light, J. (1989) · Augmentative and Alternative Communication · doi:10.1080/07434618912331275126 · Cited by 392
Self-citation
Cited by
Management of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders
Myers, S. M., Johnson, C. P., & the Council on Children With Disabilities (2007) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2007-2362 · Cited by 1,125
Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2014) · Augmentative and Alternative Communication · doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.885080 · Cited by 406
Self-citationLanguage Characteristics of Individuals With Down Syndrome
Martin, G. E., Klusek, J., Estigarribia, B., & Roberts, J. E. (2009) · Topics in Language Disorders · doi:10.1097/tld.0b013e3181a71fe1 · Cited by 399
Language and communication development in down syndrome
Roberts, J. E., Price, J., & Malkin, C. (2007) · Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/mrdd.20136 · Cited by 384
Ospina, M. B., Krebs Seida, J., Clark, B., Karkhaneh, M., Hartling, L., Tjosvold, L., Vandermeer, B., & Smith, V. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003755 · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- Millar, D. C., Light, J. C., & Schlosser, R. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 248-264
- ISSN
- 1092-4388 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-9102
- DOI
- 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/021
- OpenAlex
- W2117765732
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 64.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Impact of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Intervention on the Speech Production of Individuals With Developmental Disabilities: A Research Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/021
- The paper
- Millar, D. C., Light, J. C., & Schlosser, R. W. (2006). The Impact of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Intervention on the Speech Production of Individuals With Developmental Disabilities: A Research Review. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/021
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.