The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Early Childhood Stuttering I: Persistency and Recovery Rates
Abstract
The divergent developmental course of stuttering with its two major paths, persistency and spontaneous (unaided) recovery, has been a focus of scientific attention because of its critical theoretical, research, and clinical perspectives. Issues concerning factors underlying persistency and recovery and their implications for early intervention have stirred considerable controversy among scientists. In light of the intense interest, the scarcity of direct essential epidemiological data concerning the magnitude of the two paths and the timing of recovery is problematic. Most past studies have used retrospective methodologies. The few longitudinal studies have been severely limited in scope or objective data. The purpose of the investigation reported herein is to study the pathognomonic course of stuttering during its first several years in early childhood with special reference to the occurrence of persistent and spontaneously recovered forms of the disorder. Employing longitudinal methodology with thorough, frequent periodic follow-up observations, multiple testing, and recording of extensive speech samples, 147 preschool children who stutter have been closely followed for several years from near the onset of stuttering. In this, the first of three related articles, we present findings regarding the current stuttering status of 84 of these children, who have been followed for a minimum of 4 years after their onset of stuttering. The data indicate continuous diminution in the frequency and severity of stuttering over time as many children progressed toward recovery. Our findings lead to conservative estimates of 74% overall recovery and 26% persistency rates. The process of reaching complete recovery varied in length among the children and was distributed over a period of 4 years after onset. Detailed analyses of phonological and language skills pertaining to differentiation of the developmental paths of children who persist and those who recover are presented in the two other articles in the series (E. P. Paden et al., 1999, and R. V. Watkins et al., 1999).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bloodstein, O. (1969) · Cited by 1,020
A Stuttering Severity Instrument for Children and Adults
Riley, G. D. (1972) · Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders · doi:10.1044/jshd.3703.314 · Cited by 712
van Riper, C. (1971) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 682
Language disorders and language development
Lahey, M. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 409
(1965) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/adc.40.214.698-a · Cited by 297
Månsson, H. B. (2000) · Journal of Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0094-730x(99)00023-6 · Cited by 277
Diagnostic methods in speech pathology.
Gaines, F. P. (1963) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1963.03700250125034 · Cited by 263
Stuttering severity instrument for children and adults
Healey, E. C. (1991) · Journal of Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1016/0094-730x(91)90042-b · Cited by 261
A Longitudinal Study of Stuttering in Children: A Preliminary Report
Yairi, E., & Ambrose, N. (1992) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jshr.3504.755 · Cited by 257
Self-citationAssessing children's language in naturalistic contexts
Lund, N. J. (1983) · Cited by 254
Cited by
Epidemiology of stuttering: 21st century advances
Yairi, E., & Ambrose, N. (2013) · Journal of Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.11.002 · Cited by 649
Self-citationThe Neurocognition of Developmental Disorders of Language
Ullman, M. T., Earle, F. S., Walenski, M., & Janacsek, K. (2020) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011555 · Cited by 223
Stuttering as Defined by Adults Who Stutter
Tichenor, S. E., & Yaruss, J. S. (2019) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2019_jslhr-19-00137 · Cited by 195
Fluency Bank: A new resource for fluency research and practice
Bernstein Ratner, N., & MacWhinney, B. (2018) · Journal of Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2018.03.002 · Cited by 124
Budde, K. S., Barron, D. S., & Fox, P. T. (2014) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2014.10.002 · Cited by 114
“The high rate of spontaneous recovery, particularly in females (Yairi & Ambrose, 1999), poses a significant hurdle for gene discovery using symptom status.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Yairi, E., & Ambrose, N. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1097-1112
- ISSN
- 1092-4388 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-9102
- OpenAlex
- W1528784932
- Cited by
- 493
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 14.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Early Childhood Stuttering I: Persistency and Recovery Rates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1044/jslhr.4205.1097
- The paper
- Yairi, E., & Ambrose, N. G. (1999). Early Childhood Stuttering I: Persistency and Recovery Rates. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4205.1097
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.