The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact on the composition of the faecal flora by a new probiotic preparation: preliminary data on maintenance treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis
Abstract
Background: : Although 5‐aminosalicylic acid (5‐ASA) oral compounds are the standard maintenance treatment for ulcerative colitis in remission, some patients cannot use them because of side‐effects. Clinical and experimental observations have suggested the potential role of probiotics in inflammatory bowel disease therapy. Aim: : To evaluate the effects on intestinal microflora and the clinical efficacy of a new probiotic preparation in patients with ulcerative colitis in remission. Patients and methods: : Twenty patients with ulcerative colitis, intolerant or allergic to 5‐ASA, have been treated with a new probiotic preparation (VSL # 3, CSL, Milan, Italy) containing 5 × 10 11 cells/g of 3 strains of bifidobacteria, 4 strains of lactobacilli and 1 strain of Streptococcus salivarius ssp. thermophilus. Two doses of 3 g were administered o.d. for 12 months. Faecal samples for stool culture were obtained from the patients at the beginning of the trial and after 10, 20, 40, 60, 75, 90 days, 12 months and at 15 days after the end of the treatment. The following bacterial groups have been evaluated in the faeces: total aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, enterococci, Streptococcus thermophilus, lactobacilli, bifidobacteria, Bacteroides, clostridia, coliforms. Patients were assessed clinically every two months, and assessed endoscopically at 6 and 12 months or in relapse. Results: : Faecal concentrations of Streptococcus salivarius ssp. thermophilus, lactobacilli and bifidobacteria increased significantly in all patients, compared to their basal level, from the 20th day of treatment (P < 0.05) and remained stable throughout the study. Concentrations of Bacteroides, clostridia, coliforms, total aerobic and anaerobic bacteria did not change significantly during treatment (P = N.S.). Fifteen of 20 treated patients remained in remission during the study, one patient was lost to follow up, while the remaining relapsed. No significant side‐effects have been reported. Conclusions: : These results show that this probiotic preparation is able to colonize the intestine, and suggest that it may be useful in maintaining the remission in ulcerative colitis patients intolerant or allergic to 5‐ASA. Controlled trials are warranted to confirm these preliminary results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fuller, R. (1991) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.32.4.439 · Cited by 862
KRUIS, W., SCHÜTZ, E., FRIC, P., FIXA, B., JUDMAIER, G., & STOLTE, M. (1997) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2036.1997.00225.x · Cited by 775
Variation Between Observers in Describing Mucosal Appearances in Proctocolitis
Baron, J. H., Connell, A. M., & Lennard-Jones, J. E. (1964) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.1.5375.89 · Cited by 611
The coming of age of probiotics
Lee, Y.-K., & Salminen, S. (1995) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/s0924-2244(00)89085-8 · Cited by 540
Ecological control of the gastrointestinal tract. The role of probiotic flora
BENGMARK, S. (1998) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.42.1.2 · Cited by 509
Das, K. M., Eastwood, M. A., McManus, J. P. A., & Sircus, W. (1973) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197309062891001 · Cited by 445
Pathogenesis and immune mechanisms of chronic inflammatory bowel diseases.
Sartor, R. B. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 391
Biopsy Studies in Ulcerative Colitis
Truelove, S. C., & Richards, W. C. D. (1956) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.1.4979.1315 · Cited by 387
Dissanayake, A. S., & Truelove, S. C. (1973) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.14.12.923 · Cited by 339
Malin, M., Suomalainen, H., Saxelin, M., & Isolauri, E. (1996) · Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism · doi:10.1159/000177907 · Cited by 316
Cited by
Influence of diet on the gut microbiome and implications for human health
Singh, R. K., Chang, H.-W., Yan, D., Lee, K. M., Ucmak, D., Wong, K., Abrouk, M., Farahnik, B., Nakamura, M., Zhu, T. H., et al. (2017) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-017-1175-y · Cited by 2,599
Ott, S. J., Musfeldt, M., Wenderoth, D. F., Hampe, J., Brant, O., Fölsch, U. R., Timmis, K. N., & Schreiber, S. (2004) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2003.025403 · Cited by 1,311
Kruis, W., Frič, P., Pokrotnieks, J., Lukáš, M., Fixa, B., Kaščák, M., Kamm, M. A., Weismueller, J., Beglinger, C., Stolte, M., et al. (2004) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2003.037747 · Cited by 1,285
Probiotic functional foods: Survival of probiotics during processing and storage
Tripathi, M. K., & Giri, S. K. (2014) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2014.04.030 · Cited by 1,181
Prophylaxis of pouchitis onset with probiotic therapy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Gionchetti, P., Rizzello, F., Helwig, U., Venturi, A., Lammers, K. M., Brigidi, P., Vitali, B., Poggioli, G., Miglioli, M., & Campieri, M. (2003) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0016-5085(03)00171-9 · Cited by 1,147
Metadata
- Authors
- Venturi, Gionchetti, Rizzello, Johansson, Zucconi, Brigidi, Matteuzzi, & Campieri
- Venue
- Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-08
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1103-1108
- ISSN
- 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2036
- OpenAlex
- W2076837393
- Cited by
- 567
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 44.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact on the composition of the faecal flora by a new probiotic preparation: preliminary data on maintenance treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2036.1999.00560.x
- The paper
- Venturi, Gionchetti, Rizzello, Johansson, Zucconi, Brigidi, Matteuzzi, & Campieri. (1999). Impact on the composition of the faecal flora by a new probiotic preparation: preliminary data on maintenance treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2036.1999.00560.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.