Cited by 228Ophthalmology and Eye DisordersThyroid Disorders and TreatmentsMyasthenia Gravis and Thymoma

Smoking and endocrine ophthalmopathy: impact of smoking severity and current vs lifetime cigarette consumption

Pfeilschifter, Johannes, Ziegler, Reinhard·1996·Clinical Endocrinology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Smoking has been associated with an increased incidence of endocrine ophthalmopathy (EO). In this study we examined the relation between smoking severity and the incidence of EO symptoms in patients with Graves’ hyperthyroidism. DESIGN Patients were prospectively followed for at least one year after the onset of hyperthyroidism. Smoking and EO status were evaluated at 3−6‐ months intervals. PATIENTS Two hundred and fifty‐three ambulatory patients with recent onset of Graves’ hyperthyroidism were studied. MEASUREMENTS The incidence of total EO symptoms, proptosis, and diplopia at any time point before and after the occurrence of Graves’ hyperthyroidism was assessed by interview and physical examination. RESULTS Smoking was associated with a 1.3‐fold increase in the overall incidence of symptomatic EO, and a 2.6 and 3.1‐fold increase in the incidence of proptosis and diplopia, respectively. The relative risk increased in parallel with the current number of cigarettes smoked per day. In contrast, lifetime tobacco use was not an independent risk factor for the development of EO symptoms. Former smokers had a significantly lower risk for the occurrence of proptosis and diplopia than active smokers with a comparable lifetime cigarette consumption. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that current, but not lifetime, tobacco consumption constitutes a risk for the incidence of proptosis and diplopia in patients with Graves’ hyperthyroidism, and that this risk increases with smoking severity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1996.8220832.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pfeilschifter, J., & Ziegler, R.
Affiliations
Heidelberg University (DE)
Corresponding author
Pfeilschifter, Johannes
Venue
Clinical Endocrinology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-10
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
477-481
ISSN
  • 0300-0664 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2265
OpenAlex
W1986559988
Cited by
227
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
Keywords
smoking, endocrine ophthalmopathy, Graves' hyperthyroidism, proptosis, diplopia, former smokers, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Diplopia, Exophthalmos, Female, Graves Disease, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Risk, Smoking, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review