The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Incidentally discovered pituitary lesions: high frequency of macroadenomas and hormone‐secreting adenomas — results of a prospective study
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: With increasing use of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, pituitary adenomas are being discovered incidentally with increasing frequency. However, limited data are available concerning the clinical importance and natural history of such ‘incicentalomas’. We have undertaken a prospective study to investigate changes in adenoma size and endocrine and visual function in patients with incidentally discovered intrasellar masses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our study included 67 patients with incidentalomas of the pituitary gland during a 5‐year period (1992–96). 50 of these patients were followed up prospectively over a mean period of 2.7 years. Initially, all patients underwent endocrine testing and ophthalmological examinations as well as magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography scans. These investigations were repeated after 3 months and then annually. RESULTS: 42 (62.7%) out of 67 patients with incidentalomas had microadenomas whereas 37.3% had macroadenomas. Macroadenomas were found more frequently in men (52.2%). Visual field defects could be documented in 4.5% of the patients. Partial deficiency of anterior pituitary function was present in 14.9%. Eight patients (11.9%) had prolactinomas. An increase in adenoma size was detected in 3.2% of the microadenomas and in 26.3% of the macroadenomas within the follow‐up period. CONCLUSION: Macroadenomas and hormone secreting adenomas are not uncommon in patients with pituitary incidentalomas. Macroadenomas should be closely monitored for tumour enlargement. All patients should undergo biochemical assessment and ophthalmological examination, since endocrine dysfunction or visual field defects may be present at the time a pituitary incidentaloma is detected.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vance, M. L. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199406093302306 · Cited by 203
Chidiac, R. M., & Aron, D. C. (1997) · Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0889-8529(05)70242-5 · Cited by 140
Cited by
Subclinical Cushing’s syndrome in adrenal incidentalomas
Terzolo, M., Bovio, S., Reimondo, G., Pia, A., Osella, G., Borretta, G., & Angeli, A. (2005) · Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2005.01.008 · Cited by 179
Molitch, M. E. (2009) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.beem.2009.05.001 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Feldkamp, Santen, Harms, Aulich, Mödder, & Scherbaum
- Venue
- Clinical Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 109-113
- ISSN
- 0300-0664 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2265
- OpenAlex
- W1986267153
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidentally discovered pituitary lesions: high frequency of macroadenomas and hormone‐secreting adenomas — results of a prospective study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2265.1999.00748.x
- The paper
- Feldkamp, Santen, Harms, Aulich, Mödder, & Scherbaum. (1999). Incidentally discovered pituitary lesions: high frequency of macroadenomas and hormone‐secreting adenomas — results of a prospective study. Clinical Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2265.1999.00748.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.