Cited by 2,775Physiological and biochemical adaptationsEntomological Studies and EcologyInsect-Plant Interactions and Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 142 of the 142 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Herbivory in global climate change research: direct effects of rising temperature on insect herbivores

Open access

Abstract

This review examines the direct effects of climate change on insect herbivores. Temperature is identified as the dominant abiotic factor directly affecting herbivorous insects. There is little evidence of any direct effects of CO 2 or UVB. Direct impacts of precipitation have been largely neglected in current research on climate change. Temperature directly affects development, survival, range and abundance. Species with a large geographical range will tend to be less affected. The main effect of temperature in temperate regions is to influence winter survival; at more northerly latitudes, higher temperatures extend the summer season, increasing the available thermal budget for growth and reproduction. Photoperiod is the dominant cue for the seasonal synchrony of temperate insects, but their thermal requirements may differ at different times of year. Interactions between photoperiod and temperature determine phenology; the two factors do not necessarily operate in tandem. Insect herbivores show a number of distinct life‐history strategies to exploit plants with different growth forms and strategies, which will be differentially affected by climate warming. There are still many challenges facing biologists in predicting and monitoring the impacts of climate change. Future research needs to consider insect herbivore phenotypic and genotypic flexibility, their responses to global change parameters operating in concert, and awareness that some patterns may only become apparent in the longer term.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00451.x

Cites

142 of 142 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 142 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Aitchison CW, 1978, Notes on low temperature and winter activity of Homoptera in Manitoba, Manitoba Entomologist, 12, 135
  2. Ashworth AC, 1997, Past and Future Rapid Environmental Change, 401
  3. Bakke A, 1971, Distribution of prolonged diapausing in populations of Laspeyresia strobilella L. (Lep., Tortricidae) from spruce cones, Norsk Entomologisk Tidsskrift, 18, 89
  4. Coope GR, 1987, Organization of Communities, Past and Present, 421
  5. Dixon AFG, 1998, Aphid Ecology
  6. Fleming RA, 1995, Insects in a Changing Environment, 505
  7. Gaston KJ, 1996, Biodiversity, 202
  8. Harrington R, 1995, Insects in a Changing Environment, 126
  9. Hodkinson ID, 1979, Psylloidea (Homoptera). Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects, 2 (5A).
  10. Lawton JH, 1995, Insects in a Changing Environment, 4
  11. Tauber MJ, 1986, Seasonal Adaptations of Insecta

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bale, J. S., Masters, G. J., Hodkinson, I. D., Awmack, C., Bezemer, T. M., Brown, V. K., Butterfield, J., Buse, A., Coulson, J. C., Farrar, J., Good, J. E. G., Harrington, R., Hartley, S., Jones, T. H., Lindroth, R. L., Press, M. C., Symrnioudis, I., Watt, A. D., & Whittaker, J. B.
Affiliations
  • CAB International (GB)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
  • Rothamsted Research (GB)
  • Durham University (GB)
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of Wisconsin System (US)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Natural Environment Research Council (GB)
  • Lancaster University (GB)
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
1-16
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2149928193
Cited by
2,775
References
142
Citations by year
2026: 131 · 2025: 133 · 2024: 137 · 2023: 154 · 2022: 203 · 2021: 235 · 2020: 177 · 2019: 135 · 2018: 140 · 2017: 154 · 2016: 142 · 2015: 136 · 2014: 153 · 2013: 129 · 2012: 118
FWCI
34.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
  • Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • KNAW research portal (Royal Academy of Art and Sciences (KNAW)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Entomological Studies and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Keywords
climate change, phytophagous insects, temperature rise, insect development, winter survival, phenology, photoperiod, thermal budget, seasonal synchrony, life history strategies, precipitation effects, CO2 effect, range expansion, temperate insects, phenotypic flexibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review