The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Current directions in IS security research: towards socio‐organizational perspectives
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. The purpose of this paper is to map the current territory of information systems and security research. It uses the Burrell and Morgan framework as an intellectual map to analyse the socio‐philosophical concerns in various information systems and security approaches. The paper's contributions are in its analysis of trends in information systems and security research, the former in stressing the socio‐organizational perspectives and the latter in criticizing the preponderance of technical solutions. The paper also sets an agenda for a future research emphasis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
The Theory of Social and Economic Organization.
Delatour, G. S., Weber, M., Henderson, A. M., & Parsons, T. (1948) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2086579 · Cited by 11,300
Powers, C. H., & Giddens, A. (1988) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2579442 · Cited by 8,828
Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis.
Louis, M. R., Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1983) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392394 · Cited by 5,588
The Principles of Scientific Management.
Woolf, L. S., Taylor, F. W., Scott, W. D., & Goldmark, J. (1912) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2221959 · Cited by 5,256
How information gives you competitive advantage
Porter, M. E., & Millar, V. A. (1985) · Cited by 4,416
Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method
Walsham, G. (1995) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.1995.9 · Cited by 3,834
Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions
Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.1.1 · Cited by 3,349
Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations.
Berniker, E., & Mintzberg, H. (1984) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393181 · Cited by 2,724
Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction
Bailey, J. E., & Pearson, S. W. (1983) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.29.5.530 · Cited by 2,542
Cited by
Protection motivation and deterrence: a framework for security policy compliance in organisations
Herath, T., & Rao, H. R. (2009) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2009.6 · Cited by 1,249
Workman, M., Bommer, W. H., & Straub, D. (2008) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.04.005 · Cited by 554
Employees' Behavior towards IS Security Policy Compliance
Pahnila, S., Siponen, M., & Mahmood, A. (2007) · 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2007.206 · Cited by 429
Florida Atlantic University, Dinev, T., Hu, Q., & Florida Atlantic University (2007) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00133 · Cited by 428
Shao, Z., Zhang, L., Li, X., & Guo, Y. (2019) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2018.100823 · Cited by 423
Metadata
- Authors
- Dhillon, G., & Backhouse, J.
- Venue
- Information Systems Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 127-153
- ISSN
- 1350-1917 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2575
- OpenAlex
- W1997603734
- Cited by
- 578
- References
- 90
- FWCI
- 20.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current directions in IS security research: towards socio‐organizational perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2575.2001.00099.x
- The paper
- Dhillon, G., & Backhouse, J. (2001). Current directions in IS security research: towards socio‐organizational perspectives. Information Systems Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2575.2001.00099.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
