Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 390

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Framing learning through reflection within Carper's fundamental ways of knowing in nursing

Johns, Christopher·1995·Journal of Advanced Nursing
DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22020226.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Carper's fundamental ways of knowing have been utilized as a framework for the practitioner to consider what he or she has learnt through reflection on experience. The purpose of this paper is to consider, through an interpretation of Carper's writings and through analysing one practitioner's experience shared in a supervision milieu, whether this use of Carper's work can be reasonably justified on a theoretical and practical level

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22020226.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 390

Metadata

Authors
Johns, C.
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-08
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
226-234
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
DOI
10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22020226.x
OpenAlex
W2003724425
Cited by
390
References
28
FWCI
47.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Framing learning through reflection within Carper's fundamental ways of knowing in nursing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22020226.x
The paper
Johns, C. (1995). Framing learning through reflection within Carper's fundamental ways of knowing in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22020226.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.