The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Individual determinants of research utilization: a systematic review
Abstract
Context. In order to design interventions that increase research use in nursing, it is necessary to have an understanding of what influences research use. Objective. To report findings on a systematic review of studies that examine individual characteristics of nurses and how they influence the utilization of research. Search strategy. A survey of published articles in English that examine the influence of individual factors on the research utilization behaviour of nurses, without restriction of the study design, from selected computerized databases and hand searches. Inclusion criteria. Articles had to measure one or more individual determinants of research utilization, measure the dependent variable (research utilization), and evaluate the relationship between the dependent and independent variables. The studies also had to indicate the direction of the relationship between the independent and dependent variables, report a P‐value and the statistic used, and indicate the magnitude of the relationship. Results. Six categories of potential individual determinants were identified: beliefs and attitudes, involvement in research activities, information seeking, professional characteristics, education and other socio‐economic factors. Research design, sampling, measurement, and statistical analysis were examined to evaluate methodological quality. Methodological problems surfaced in all of the studies and, apart from attitude to research, there was little to suggest that any potential individual determinant influences research use. Conclusion. Important conceptual and measurement issues with regard to research utilization could be better addressed if research in the area were undertaken longitudinally by multi‐disciplinary teams of researchers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nursing Research: Principles and Methods
Marrone, S. R. (1987) · AORN Journal · doi:10.1016/s0001-2092(07)69731-2 · Cited by 3,212
The Many Meanings of Research Utilization
Weiss, C. H. (1979) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.2307/3109916 · Cited by 2,222
Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework.
Kitson, A., Harvey, G., & McCormack, B. (1998) · Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.7.3.149 · Cited by 1,985
Karnowski, V., & Kümpel, A. S. (2016) · Schlüsselwerke der Medienwirkungsforschung · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-09923-7_9 · Cited by 1,311
Using Mentoring and Storytelling to Transfer Knowledge in the Workplace
Swap, W., Leonard, D., Shields, M., & Abrams, L. (2001) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2001.11045668 · Cited by 722
Barriers: The barriers to research utilization scale
Funk, S. G., Champagne, M. T., Wiese, R. A., & Tornquist, E. M. (1991) · Applied Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/s0897-1897(05)80052-7 · Cited by 583
Utilization of social science research knowledge in Canada
Landry, R., Amara, N., & Lamari, M. (2001) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00081-0 · Cited by 482
Diffusion, Dissemination, and Implementation: Who Should Do What?
LOMAS, J. (1993) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26351.x · Cited by 397
Toward a Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Model of Health Care Research Use
LOGAN, J., & GRAHAM, I. D. (1998) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547098020002004 · Cited by 347
If Dissemination Is the Solution, What Is the Problem ?
Knott, J., & Wildavsky, A. (1980) · Knowledge · doi:10.1177/107554708000100404 · Cited by 320
Cited by
Individual determinants of research utilization by nurses: a systematic review update
Squires, J. E., Estabrooks, C. A., Gustavsson, P., & Wallin, L. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-1 · Cited by 798
Self-citationAn exploration of the factors that influence the implementation of evidence into practice
Rycroft‐Malone, J., Harvey, G., Seers, K., Kitson, A., McCormack, B., & Titchen, A. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01007.x · Cited by 623
Cummings, G. G., Tate, K., Lee, S., Wong, C. A., Paananen, T., Micaroni, S. P. M., & Chatterjee, G. E. (2018) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.04.016 · Cited by 637
Brown, C. E., Wickline, M. A., Ecoff, L., & Glaser, D. (2009) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04878.x · Cited by 470
Work engagement in professional nursing practice: A systematic review
Keyko, K., Cummings, G. G., Yonge, O., & Wong, C. A. (2016) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.06.003 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Estabrooks, C. A., Floyd, J. A., Scott‐Findlay, S., O'Leary, K. A., & Gushta, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-08-14
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 506-520
- ISSN
- 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2648
- OpenAlex
- W2170989842
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 7.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Individual determinants of research utilization: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02748.x
- The paper
- Estabrooks, C. A., Floyd, J. A., Scott‐Findlay, S., O'Leary, K. A., & Gushta, M. (2003). Individual determinants of research utilization: a systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02748.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.