Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 266

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The relationship of critical thinking skills and critical thinking dispositions of baccalaureate nursing students

Profetto‐McGrath, Joanne·2003·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

Background. Critical thinking is essential to nursing practice; therefore, knowledge and understanding of nursing students’ critical thinking skills (CTS) and related dispositions are important to nurse educators. This paper presents the results of a non‐experimental study conducted in spring 1998, identifies implications for nurse educators, and offers recommendations for future research. Aim. The aim of the study was to investigate the CTS and critical thinking dispositions (CTD) of students enrolled in a 4‐year baccalaureate programme at a university in Western Canada. Methods. The study used a cross‐sectional design. Data collection occurred during regularly scheduled classes. A volunteer sample of 228 students from all 4 years of the baccalaureate programme completed a background/demographic questionnaire, the California Critical Thinking Skills Test, and the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. The reliability of the test and inventory were established using the Kuder Richardson 20 and Cronbach Alpha respectively. Both descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were carried out. Findings. Critical thinking mean scores increased from years 1 to 4 with the exception of year 3. However, there was no statistically significant difference among the four student groups. Although differences in critical thinking disposition scores were not statistically significant, students’ scores differed significantly on the systematicity subscale. There was a significant relationship between students’ overall CTS and CTD scores. Conclusions. Approximately 38% of the students in the current study had adequate levels of CTS and 85·5% of the students had adequate levels of CTD. Results indicate a need for students’ continued development in these areas. Dispositions are crucial to critical thinking; without them critical thinking does not happen or may be substandard.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02755.x

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 266

Metadata

Authors
Profetto‐McGrath, J.
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-08-29
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
569-577
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W1990070749
Cited by
266
References
24
FWCI
27.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relationship of critical thinking skills and critical thinking dispositions of baccalaureate nursing students. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02755.x
The paper
Profetto‐McGrath, J. (2003). The relationship of critical thinking skills and critical thinking dispositions of baccalaureate nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02755.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.