Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 765

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century

Dwyer, Christopher P., Hogan, Michael J., Stewart, Ian·2014·Thinking Skills and Creativity
DOI 10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Abrami, 2008, Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: A stage 1 metaanalysis, Review of Educational Research, 78, 1102, 10.3102/0034654308326084 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Baddeley, 2002, Is working memory still working?, European Psychologist, 7, 85, 10.1027//1016-9040.7.2.85 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Baddeley, 2002, Prose recall and amnesia: Implications for the structure of working memory, Neuropsychologia, 43, 583
  4. Banich, 2009, Executive function: The search for an integrated account, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 89, 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01615.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. Baril, 1998, Critical thinking in the public accounting profession: Aptitudes and attitudes, Journal of Accounting Education, 16, 381, 10.1016/S0748-5751(98)00023-2 · doi:10.1016/s0748-5751(98)00023-2
  6. Barton, 2007, Teaching controversial issues where controversial issues really matter, Teaching History, 127, 13
  7. Beckie, 2001, Assessing critical thinking in baccalaureate nursing students: A longitudinal study, Holistic Nursing Practice, 15, 18, 10.1097/00004650-200104000-00006 · DOI
  8. Butchart, 2009, Improving critical thinking using web-based argument mapping exercises with automated feedback, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25, 268, 10.14742/ajet.1154 · DOI
  9. Butler, 2012, Extending the validity of Halpern critical thinking assessments: Cross-national applications, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7, 112, 10.1016/j.tsc.2012.04.001 · DOI
  10. Colucciello, 1997, Critical thinking skills and dispositions of baccalaureate nursing students – A conceptual model for evaluation, Journal of Professional Nursing, 13, 236, 10.1016/S8755-7223(97)80094-4 · DOI
  11. Craik, 1975, Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268, 10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Dwyer, 2012, An evaluation of argument mapping as a method of enhancing critical thinking performance in e-learning environments, Metacognition and Learning, 7, 219, 10.1007/s11409-012-9092-1 · DOI
  13. Ennis, 1998, Is critical thinking culturally biased?, Teaching Philosophy, 21, 15, 10.5840/teachphil19982113 · DOI
  14. Facione, 2000, The disposition toward critical thinking: Its character, measurement, and relationship to critical thinking, Informal Logic, 20, 61, 10.22329/il.v20i1.2254 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Facione, 2001, Analyzing explanations for seemingly irrational choices: Linking argument analysis and cognitive science, International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 15, 267, 10.5840/ijap200115217 · DOI
  16. Gambrill, 2006, Evidence-based practice and policy: Choices ahead, Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 338, 10.1177/1049731505284205 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Hitchcock, 2004, The effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in critical thinking, Informal Logic, 24, 183, 10.22329/il.v24i3.2145 · DOI
  18. Holmes, 1997, Facing the 21st century, Business Education Forum, 52, 33
  19. King, 2004, Reflective judgment: Theory and research on the development of epistemic assumptions through adulthood, Educational Psychologist, 39, 5, 10.1207/s15326985ep3901_2 · DOI · Paper page
  20. King, 1990, Critical thinking among college and graduate students, Review of Higher Education, 13, 167, 10.1353/rhe.1990.0026 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Kitchener, 1981, Reflective judgment: Concepts of justifications and their relation to age and gender, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2, 89, 10.1016/0193-3973(81)90032-0 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Ku, 2009, Assessing students’ critical thinking performance: Urging for measurements using multi-response format, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4, 70, 10.1016/j.tsc.2009.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Ku, 2010, Metacognitive strategies that enhance critical thinking, Metacognition and Learning, 5, 251, 10.1007/s11409-010-9060-6 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Kuhn, 1999, A developmental model of critical thinking, Educational Researcher, 28, 16, 10.3102/0013189X028002016 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Lloyd, 2010, Thinking critically about critical thinking in higher education, International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4, 1
  26. Maybery, 1986, Information-processing demands of transitive inference, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 600, 10.1037/0278-7393.12.4.600 · DOI
  27. Meyer, 1980, Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students, Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 72, 10.2307/747349 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Miller, 2001, An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function, Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167, 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Munch, 1993, The effects of argument structure and affective tagging on product attitude formation, Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 294, 10.1086/209350 · DOI
  30. Perkins, 1993, Beyond abilities: A dispositional theory of thinking, Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 39, 1
  31. Profeto-McGrath, 2003, The relationship of critical thinking skills and critical thinking dispositions of baccalaureate nursing students, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 43, 569, 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02755.x · DOI · Paper page
  32. Reed, 2001, Teaching critical thinking in a community college history course: Empirical evidence from infusing Paul's model, College Student Journal, 35, 201
  33. Reeves, 1990, An application of Bloom's taxonomy to the teaching of business ethics, Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 609, 10.1007/BF00383217 · DOI
  34. Rimiene, 2002, Assessing and developing students’ critical thinking, Psychology Learning and Teaching, 2, 17, 10.2304/plat.2002.2.1.17 · doi:10.2304/plat.2002.2.1.17
  35. Solon, 2007, Generic critical thinking infusion and course content learning in introductory psychology, Journal of Instructional Psychology, 34, 95
  36. Sorensen, 2008, Precepting in the fast lane: Improving critical thinking in new graduate nurses, The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 39, 208, 10.3928/00220124-20080501-07 · DOI
  37. Valenzuela, 2011, Critical Thinking Motivational Scale: A contribution to the study of relationship between critical thinking and motivation, Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9, 823
  38. Zelazo, 1997, Early development of executive function: A problem solving framework, Review of General Psychology, 1, 198, 10.1037/1089-2680.1.2.198 · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.1.2.198 · Paper page

Cited by

See all 765

Metadata

Authors
Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I.
Venue
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
12
Pages
43-52
ISSN
1871-1871 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004
OpenAlex
W2090561727
Cited by
765
References
9
FWCI
95.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004
The paper
Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.