Cited by 676Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchBehavioral and Psychological StudiesAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk markers associated with challenging behaviours in people with intellectual disabilities: a meta-analytic study

Open access
McClintock, K., Hall, S., Oliver, C.·2003·Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

Abstract

A meta-analysis of prevalence and cohort studies conducted over the last 30 years was carried out to identify risk markers for challenging behaviour shown by individuals with intellectual disabilities (IDs). A total of 86 potential studies was identified from the review, with 22 (25.6%) containing sufficient data to enable a statistical analysis to be conducted. Results indicated that males were significantly more likely to show aggression than females, and that individuals with a severe/profound degree of ID were significantly more likely to show self-injury and stereotypy than individuals with a mild/moderate degree of ID. Individuals with a diagnosis of autism were significantly more likely to show self-injury, aggression and disruption to the environment whilst individuals with deficits in receptive and expressive communication were significantly more likely to show self-injury. In most cases, tests for heterogeneity were statistically significant, as expected. The meta-analysis highlighted the paucity of methodologically robust studies of risk markers for challenging behaviours and the lack of data on incidence, prevalence and chronicity of challenging behaviour in this population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2003.00517.x

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Abramson J. H., 1994, Making Sense of Data: A Self‐Instructional Manual on the Interpretation of Epidemiological Data
  2. Emerson E., 2000, Challenging Behavior. Analysis and Intervention in People with Intellectual Disabilities
  3. Murphy G. H., 1993, Research to Practice?: Implications of Research on the Challenging Behaviour of People with Learning Disability, 1
  4. Oliver C., 1993, Research to Practice?: Implications of Research on the Challenging Behaviour of People with Learning Disability, 135
  5. SchroederS. R. BickelW. K.&RichmondG.(1986)Primary and secondary prevention of self‐injurious behaviors: a lifelong problem. In:voltl Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities(ed.K. D.Gadow) Vol.5 pp.63–85.JAI Press Greenwich CT.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 676

Metadata

Authors
McClintock, K., Hall, S., & Oliver, C.
Affiliations
University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Oliver, C.
Venue
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-08-15
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
405-416
ISSN
  • 0964-2633 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2788
OpenAlex
W1975575139
Cited by
675
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 34
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Intellectual Disability Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
behavioral problems, intellectual disability, risk indicators, aggression, self-harm, stereotypy, autism spectrum disorder, communication difficulties, sex differences, severity of intellectual disability, environmental disturbance
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aggression, Child, Humans, Intellectual Disability, Risk Factors, Social Behavior, Self-Injurious Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review