The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Parallel Rural Community Curriculum: an integrated clinical curriculum based in rural general practice
Abstract
Introduction: In an attempt to address the rural medical workforce maldistribution and the concurrent inappropriate caseload at the urban tertiary teaching hospitals, Flinders University and the Riverland Division of General Practice decided to pilot, in 1997, an entire year of undergraduate clinical curriculum in Australian rural general practice. This program is called the Parallel Rural Community Curriculum (PRCC). This paper is a discussion of the aims of the programme; student selection; practice recruitment; curriculum structure, and academic content, together with lessons learnt from the evaluation of the first cohort of students’ experience of the course. Methods: Independent external evaluators undertook a thematic analysis of a series of structured interviews of students and faculty involved in both the PRCC and the traditional curriculum. The mean examination results were determined and a rank order comparison of student academic performance was undertaken. Results: The eight selected volunteer students reported greater access to patients and clinical learning opportunities than their mainstream counterparts and learned clinical decision making in the context of the whole patient, their family, and the available community resources. They identified patients with ‘core’ clinical conditions and had a longitudinal exposure to common diseases, whereas hospital‐based peers had a cross‐sectional exposure to highly filtered illness. The PRCC students’ academic performance improved in comparison with that of their tertiary hospital peers’ and in comparison to their own results in previous years. Conclusion: The PRCC curriculum has cut across the traditional clinical discipline boundaries by teaching in an integrated way in rural general practice. It has affirmed the potential role of true generalist physicians in undergraduate medical education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
“Continuity” as an Organizing Principle for Clinical Education Reform
Hirsh, D. A., Ogur, B., Thibault, G. E., & Cox, M. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsb061660 · Cited by 540
Changing face of medical curricula
Jones, R., Higgs, R., de Angelis, C., & Prideaux, D. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04134-9 · Cited by 324
Self-citationThe Harvard Medical School-Cambridge Integrated Clerkship: An Innovative Model of Clinical Education
Ogur, B., Hirsh, D., Krupat, E., & Bor, D. (2007) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e31803338f0 · Cited by 288
Norris, T. E., Schaad, D. C., DeWitt, D., Ogur, B., & Hunt, D. D. (2009) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e3181a85776 · Cited by 282
How and what do medical students learn in clerkships? Experience based learning (ExBL)
Dornan, T., Tan, N., Boshuizen, H., Gick, R., Isba, R., Mann, K., Scherpbier, A., Spencer, J., & Timmins, E. (2014) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-014-9501-0 · Cited by 198
Metadata
- Authors
- Worley, P., Silagy, C., Prideaux, D., Newble, D., & Jones, A.
- Venue
- Medical Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 558-565
- ISSN
- 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2923
- OpenAlex
- W2167473363
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Parallel Rural Community Curriculum: an integrated clinical curriculum based in rural general practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00668.x
- The paper
- Worley, P., Silagy, C., Prideaux, D., Newble, D., & Jones, A. (2000). The Parallel Rural Community Curriculum: an integrated clinical curriculum based in rural general practice. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00668.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.