The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nitric oxide in plants: the history is just beginning
Abstract
Nitric oxide (NO) is a bioactive molecule that exerts a number of diverse activities in phylogenetically distant species, as well as opposing effects in related biological systems. It was firstly described in mammals as a major messenger in the cardiovascular, immune and nervous system, in which it plays regulatory, signalling, cytoprotective and cytotoxic effects (Ignarro, Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology 30, 535–560, 1990; Anbar, Experientia 51, 545–550, 1995). This versatility is mainly achieved through interactions with targets via either a redox or an additive chemistry (Stamler, Cell 78, 931–936, 1994). For this reason, metal‐ and thiol‐containing proteins serve as major target sites for NO: these include signalling proteins, receptors, enzymes, transcription factors and DNA, among others. Furthermore, NO is a small, highly diffusible molecule. It rapidly crosses biological membranes and triggers various different processes in a short period of time. In this context, NO can co‐ordinate and regulate cellular functions of microsomes and organelles such as mitochondria. The ubiquity of NO reactions, as well as the finding that the biochemical and molecular mechanisms underlying many physiological processes are well conserved between diverse species, have opened the exploration of NO chemistry in different organisms. Among these, plants were not the exception. The research in plants has been focused on three main fields: (i) the search for NO or any source of NO generation; (ii) the examination of the effects of NO upon exogenous treatments; and (iii) the search for the same molecules involved in NO‐sensitive transduction pathways as in animals (e.g. cGMP, Ca 2+, calmodulin). As it is evident from this review, recent progress on NO functionality in plants has been impressive. With the use of biochemistry, molecular genetics and structural biology, together with classical physiological approaches, an explosion of new discoveries will surely begin. It is certainly a good time for plant biologists.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lipton, S. A., Choi, Y.-B., Pan, Z.-H., Lei, S. Z., Chen, H.-S. V., Sucher, N. J., Loscalzo, J., Singel, D. J., & Stamler, J. S. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/364626a0 · Cited by 2,433
Nonenzymatic Nitric Oxide Production in Humans
Weitzberg, E., & Lundberg, J. O. N. (1998) · Nitric Oxide · doi:10.1006/niox.1997.0162 · Cited by 296
Cited by
Foyer, C. H., & Noctor, G. (2003) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1034/j.1399-3054.2003.00223.x · Cited by 1,316
Nitric oxide signalling in plants
Neill, S. J., Desikan, R., & Hancock, J. T. (2003) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00804.x · Cited by 874
Desikan, R., Griffiths, R., Hancock, J., & Neill, S. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.252461999 · Cited by 710
Guo, F.-Q., & Crawford, N. M. (2005) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.105.037770 · Cited by 406
Maia, L. B., & Moura, J. J. G. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400518y · Cited by 401
Metadata
- Authors
- Beligni, M. V., & Lamattina, L.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 267-278
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W2077124079
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitric oxide in plants: the history is just beginning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00672.x
- The paper
- Beligni, M. V., & Lamattina, L. (2001). Nitric oxide in plants: the history is just beginning. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00672.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.