Cited by 33Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentParasites and Host InteractionsParasitic infections in humans and animals

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Utility of antibodies against a 22 kD molecule of Dirofilaria immitis in the diagnosis of human pulmonary dirofilariasis

Open access
Perera, L., Pérez‐Arellano, J. L., Cordero, M., Simón, F., Muro, A.·1998·Tropical Medicine & International Health

Abstract

To assess the characteristics of an ELISA test for the diagnosis of human pulmonary dirofilariasis, we studied the sera of 24 subjects with other helmintoses and of 37 patients suffering from non-parasitic focal lung diseases, comparing them with negative and positive sera. ELISA and Western blot with complete somatic antigen and ELISA with protein Di22 (specifically recognized in cases of lung dirofilariasis) were performed. With ELISA SA the false positive rate was 25% in cases with other parasitoses and 30% in cases with focal lung diseases. ELISA Di22 decreases this positivity levels. Only 2 cases with visceral larva migrans (8.3%) and a case with lung nodules metastatic from renal adenocarcinoma (2.7%) were positive. ELISA Di22 therefore greatly decreases the false positive rate of ELISA SA.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-3156.1998.00209.x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Muro A Genchi C Cordero M & Simón F (1998) Human dirofilariosis: A review with special emphasis on the situation in the European Union.Parasitology Todayin press
  2. Perera L, 1994, Evaluation of a 22kDa Dirofilaria immitis antigen for the immunodiagnosis of human pulmonary dirofilariasis., Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, 45, 249

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 33

Metadata

Authors
Perera, L., Pérez‐Arellano, J. L., Cordero, M., Simón, F., & Muro, A.
Affiliations
Universidad de Salamanca (ES)
Corresponding author
Muro, A.
Venue
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-02
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
151-155
ISSN
  • 1360-2276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3156
OpenAlex
W2051191410
Cited by
33
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tropical Medicine & International Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasites and Host Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasitic infections in humans and animals
Keywords
Dirofilaria immitis, ELISA, serological diagnosis, false positive rate, visceral larva migrans, Western blot
MeSH terms
Aged, Animals, Antibodies, Helminth, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Humans, Lung Diseases, Parasitic, Male, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Blotting, Western, Reproducibility of Results, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review