Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 183

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Star cluster formation and disruption time-scales - I. An empirical determination of the disruption time of star clusters in four galaxies

Open access
Boutloukos, S. G., Lamers, H. J. G. L. M.·2003·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We have derived the disruption times of star clusters from cluster samples of four galaxies, M51, M33, the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) and the solar neighbourhood. If the disruption time of clusters in a galaxy depends only on their initial mass as tdis(yr) =t4dis(Mcl/104 M⊙)γ, and if the cluster formation rate is constant, then the mass and age distributions of the observed clusters will each be given by double power-law relations. For clusters of low mass or young age the power law depends on the fading of the clusters below the detection limit due to the evolution of the stars. For clusters of high mass and old age the power law depends on the disruption time of the clusters. The samples of clusters in M51 and M33, observed with HST-WFPC2, indeed show the predicted double power-law relations in both their mass and age distributions. The values of tdis4 and γ can be derived from these relations. For the cluster samples of the SMC and the solar neighbourhood, taken from the literature, only the age distribution is known. This also shows the characteristic double power-law behaviour, which allows the determination of t4dis and γ in these galaxies. The values of γ are the same in the four galaxies within the uncertainty, and the mean value is γ= 0.62 ± 0.06. However, the disruption time t4dis of a cluster of 104 M⊙ is very different in the different galaxies. The clusters in the SMC have the longest disruption time, t4dis≃ 8 × 109 yr, and the clusters at 1–3 kpc from the nucleus of M51 have the shortest disruption time of t4dis≃ 4 × 107 yr. The disruption time of clusters 1–5 kpc from the nucleus of M33 is t4dis≃ 1.3 × 108 yr and for clusters within 1 kpc from the Sun we find t4dis≃ 1.0 × 109 yr.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06083.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 183

Metadata

Authors
Boutloukos, S. G., & Lamers, H. J. G. L. M.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2003-01
Volume
338
Issue
3
Pages
717-732
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2002086334
Cited by
183
References
1
FWCI
7.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Star cluster formation and disruption time-scales - I. An empirical determination of the disruption time of star clusters in four galaxies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06083.x
The paper
Boutloukos, S. G., & Lamers, H. J. G. L. M. (2003). Star cluster formation and disruption time-scales - I. An empirical determination of the disruption time of star clusters in four galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06083.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.