The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of protein–protein interaction sites in heterocomplexes with neural networks
Open accessAbstract
In this paper we address the problem of extracting features relevant for predicting protein–protein interaction sites from the three‐dimensional structures of protein complexes. Our approach is based on information about evolutionary conservation and surface disposition. We implement a neural network based system, which uses a cross validation procedure and allows the correct detection of 73% of the residues involved in protein interactions in a selected database comprising 226 heterodimers. Our analysis confirms that the chemico‐physical properties of interacting surfaces are difficult to distinguish from those of the whole protein surface. However neural networks trained with a reduced representation of the interacting patch and sequence profile are sufficient to generalize over the different features of the contact patches and to predict whether a residue in the protein surface is or is not in contact. By using a blind test, we report the prediction of the surface interacting sites of three structural components of the Dnak molecular chaperone system, and find close agreement with previously published experimental results. We propose that the predictor can significantly complement results from structural and functional proteomics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892
Kabsch, W., & Sander, C. (1983) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.360221211 · Cited by 15,320
A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T. A., Judson, R. S., Knight, J. R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001009 · Cited by 4,706
Principles of protein-protein interactions
Jones, S., & Thornton, J. M. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.1.13 · Cited by 2,684
Detecting Protein Function and Protein-Protein Interactions from Genome Sequences
Marcotte, E. M., Pellegrini, M., Ng, H.-L., Rice, D. W., Yeates, T. O., & Eisenberg, D. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5428.751 · Cited by 1,670
Protein sequence alignments: a strategy for the hierarchical analysis of residue conservation
Livingstone, C. D., & Barton, G. J. (1993) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/9.6.745 · Cited by 550
Cited by
Coupled Folding and Binding with α-Helix-Forming Molecular Recognition Elements
Oldfield, C. J., Cheng, Y., Cortese, M. S., Romero, P., Uversky, V. N., & Dunker, A. K. (2005) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi050736e · Cited by 630
Keskin, O., Ma, B., & Nussinov, R. (2005) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.10.077 · Cited by 519
Shoemaker, B. A., & Panchenko, A. R. (2007) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030043 · Cited by 332
Zeng, M., Zhang, F., Wu, F.-X., Li, Y., Wang, J., & Li, M. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz699 · Cited by 281
(2025) · doi:10.1109/tsipn.2025.3587396 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Fariselli, P., Pazos, F., Valencia, A., & Casadio, R.
- Venue
- European Journal of Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 269
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1356-1361
- ISSN
- 0014-2956 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1033
- OpenAlex
- W1483099488
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 5.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of protein–protein interaction sites in heterocomplexes with neural networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.02767.x
- The paper
- Fariselli, P., Pazos, F., Valencia, A., & Casadio, R. (2002). Prediction of protein–protein interaction sites in heterocomplexes with neural networks. European Journal of Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.02767.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.