Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Present and future of quantitative trait locus analysis in plant breeding

Open access
Asíns, M. J.·2002·Plant Breeding

Abstract

The joint analysis of genotype marker segregation and phenotypic values of individuals or lines enables the detection and location of loci affecting quantitative traits (QTL). The availability of DNA markers and powerful biometric methods has led to considerable progress in QTL mapping in plants. The most obvious applications of QTL analysis seem to be marker‐assisted selection (MAS) in breeding and pre‐breeding and QTL cloning. However, other areas are envisaged where QTL analysis can contribute decisively. These are: the understanding of complex traits such as plant‐pathogen interaction; plant genomics, connecting proteins and regulatory elements of known functions to QTL by candidate gene analysis; and germplasm enhancement through a characterization that allows its efficient utilization. The success in all these applications depends primarily on the reliability and accuracy of the QTL analysis itself. Therefore, the discussion of its limitations will constitute an important part of this review.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1439-0523.2002.730285.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 296

Metadata

Authors
Asíns, M. J.
Venue
Plant Breeding
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-08
Volume
121
Issue
4
Pages
281-291
ISSN
  • 0179-9541 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-0523
OpenAlex
W2110714304
Cited by
296
References
1
FWCI
5.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Present and future of quantitative trait locus analysis in plant breeding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1439-0523.2002.730285.x
The paper
Asíns, M. J. (2002). Present and future of quantitative trait locus analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0523.2002.730285.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.