The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prognostic value of tumor‐associated macrophage count in human bladder cancer
Open accessAbstract
Background : We determined the tumor‐associated macrophage (TAM) count to investigate its importance in predicting clinical outcome or prognosis in patients with bladder cancer. Methods : The TAM count and microvessel count (MVC) were determined immunohistochemically in 63 patients with bladder cancer, including 40 superficial bladder cancers and 23 invasive bladder cancers. To examine the relationship between TAM count and clinical outcome or prognosis in bladder cancer, cystectomy rates, distant metastasis rates, vascular invasion rates and 5 year survival rates were compared between patients with low (< 67) and high (≥ 67) TAM counts. Results : The TAM count in invasive bladder cancers (154.22 ± 11.98) was significantly higher than in superficial bladder cancers (49.05 ± 7.76; P < 0.0001). The MVC in invasive bladder cancers (71.55 ± 10.44) was also significantly higher than in superficial bladder cancers (47.02 ± 5.57; P < 0.05). There was a positive correlation between TAM count and MVC (r = 0.30; P = 0.02). Immunohistochemical staining using CD68/horseradish peroxidase monoclonal antibody showed more infiltrating cells in invasive than superficial bladder cancers. Patients with a high TAM count (≥ 67) showed significantly higher rates of cystectomy, distant metastasis and vascular invasion than those with a lower TAM count (< 67). The 5 year survival rate estimated using the Kaplan– Meier method was significantly lower in patients with a high TAM count than in those with a low TAM count (P < 0.0001). Conclusions : Our results suggest that determination of TAM count in bladder cancer tissues is of value to predict the clinical outcome or prognosis and to select appropriate treatment strategies in patients with bladder cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Distinct role of macrophages in different tumor microenvironments
Lewis, C. E., & Pollard, J. W. (2006) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-4005 · Cited by 2,225
Bingle, L., Brown, N. J., & Lewis, C. E. (2002) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.1027 · Cited by 2,022
Cytokines and their relationship to the symptoms and outcome of cancer
Seruga, B., Zhang, H., Bernstein, L. J., & Tannock, I. F. (2008) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2507 · Cited by 652
Edin, S., Wikberg, M. L., Dahlin, A. M., Rutegård, J., Öberg, Å., Oldenborg, P.-A., & Palmqvist, R. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047045 · Cited by 454
Macrophage Responses to Hypoxia
Lewis, C., & Murdoch, C. (2005) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9440(10)62038-x · Cited by 413
Metadata
- Authors
- Hanada, T., Nakagawa, M., Emoto, A., Nomura, T., Nasu, N., & Nomura, Y.
- Venue
- International Journal of Urology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 263-269
- ISSN
- 0919-8172 (ISSN-L)
- 1442-2042
- OpenAlex
- W2027584970
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic value of tumor‐associated macrophage count in human bladder cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1442-2042.2000.00190.x
- The paper
- Hanada, T., Nakagawa, M., Emoto, A., Nomura, T., Nasu, N., & Nomura, Y. (2000). Prognostic value of tumor‐associated macrophage count in human bladder cancer. International Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2042.2000.00190.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.