The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional properties and interaction of the anterior and posterior intraparietal areas in humans
Abstract
In the monkey the lateral bank of the anterior part of the intraparietal sulcus (area AIP), contains neurons that are involved in visually guided, object‐related hand movements. It has also been shown that neurons in the caudal part of the intraparietal sulcus (area CIP) preferentially respond to 3D surface orientation. According to these results, it has been hypothesized that neurons in area CIP primarily encode the 3D features of an object and forwards this information to area AIP. AIP then utilizes this information for appropriate hand actions towards the object. Based on analogies to these primate studies, recent neuroimaging studies have suggested human homologues of areas AIP and CIP, however, the functional interaction between these areas remains unclear. Our event related fMRI study was designed to address specifically the question, how CIP and AIP interact in the process of adjustment of hand orientation towards objects. Volunteers were asked to perform three tasks: discrimination of surface orientation, imaging of visually guided hand movements and execution of visually guided hand movements. Our data show that the human AIP was activated both during discrimination of surface orientation and during the subsequent spatial adjustment of the thumb and index finger position towards the surface orientation. In contrast, human CIP was activated by the surface orientation but not by spatial adjustment of finger position. These data clearly indicate that the function of human CIP is more involved in coding 3D features of the objects, whereas human AIP is more involved in visually guided hand movements, similar to its role in the monkey.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Task-based fMRI investigation has identified a homologous region of primate AIP, which is activated by visually guided grasping (Shikata et al. 2003; Culham et al. 2003), but also in observation and imitation of movements (Mühlau et al. 2005), and observation of graspable objects (Chao and Martin 2000).”
From Neuroanatomical correlates of peripersonal space: bridging the gap between perception, action, emotion and social cognition (2024) · cites this paper as Shikata et al. 2003
Citations
Cites
Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. J., Poline, J. ‐., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460020402 · Cited by 9,688
Spatial registration and normalization of images
Friston, K. J., Ashburner, J., Frith, C., Poline, J.-B., Heather, J. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1995) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460030303 · Cited by 3,744
Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again
Worsley, K. J., & Friston, K. J. (1995) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1995.1023 · Cited by 2,198
The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control
Hopfinger, J. B., Buonocore, M. H., & Mangun, G. R. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/72999 · Cited by 1,876
Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex
Corbetta, M., Kincade, J. M., Ollinger, J. M., McAvoy, M. P., & Shulman, G. L. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/73009 · Cited by 1,816
A Common Network of Functional Areas for Attention and Eye Movements
Corbetta, M., Akbudak, E., Conturo, T. E., Snyder, A. Z., Ollinger, J. M., Drury, H. A., Linenweber, M. R., Petersen, S. E., Raichle, M. E., Essen, D. C. V., et al. (1998) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80593-0 · Cited by 1,644
Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation
Jeannerod, M., Arbib, M. A., Rizzolatti, G., & Sakata, H. (1995) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(95)93921-j · Cited by 1,399
Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography
Nobre, A. (1997) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/120.3.515 · Cited by 900
Murata, A., Gallese, V., Luppino, G., Kaseda, M., & Sakata, H. (2000) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.2000.83.5.2580 · Cited by 841
A fronto‐parietal circuit for object manipulation in man: evidence from an fMRI‐study
Binkofski, F., Buccino, G., Posse, S., Seitz, R. J., Rizzolatti, G., & Freund, H.-J. (1999) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00753.x · Cited by 731
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Kusunoki M., 1993, Selectivity of the parietal visual neurons in the axis orientation of objects in space, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 19, 770
- Talairach P., 1988, Stereotactic Coplanar Atlas of the Human Brain
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–136 of 136
Left visual field preference for a bimanual grasping task with ecologically valid object sizes
Le, A., & Niemeier, M. (2013) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-013-3643-9 · Cited by 12
“1995; Sakata and Taira 1994) within which the aIPS is assumed to constitute the initial step of visual analysis for visually guided grasping (Binkofski et al. 1998; Castiello and Begliomini 2008; Cavina-Pratesi et al. 2010; Cohen et al. 2009; Culham et al. 2003; Culham and Valyear 2006; Davare et al. 2007, 2010; Frey…”
BackgroundThe ‘F-complex’ and MMN tap different aspects of deviance
Laufer, I., & Pratt, H. (2004) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2004.08.007 · Cited by 11
Uji, M., Jentzsch, I., Redburn, J., & Vishwanath, D. (2019) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.04.017 · Cited by 11
Organization of Human Visual Cortex
Rajimehr, R., & Tootell, R. B. H. (2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012370880-9.00292-9 · Cited by 11
Dorsal and Ventral Streams in the Sense of Touch
Gardner, E. P. (2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012370880-9.00354-6 · Cited by 10
Hand Use and the Evolution of Posterior Parietal Cortex in Primates
Hinkley, L. B. N., Padberg, J., Krubitzer, L. A., & Disbrow, E. A. (2007) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b0-12-370878-8/00040-9 · Cited by 8
Signal propagation in cortical networks: A Digital Signal Processing Approach
Rodrigues, F. A. (2009) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/neuro.11.024.2009 · Cited by 7
“For instance, the posterior intraparietal area is involved in visually guided, object-related and hand movements (Shikata et al., 2003).”
Ferretti, G. (2016) · Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-38983-7_10 · Cited by 7
The Neuroscience of Action and Perception
Chinellato, E., & del Pobil, A. P. (2015) · Cognitive systems monographs · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20303-4_2 · Cited by 8
Boeken, O. J., & Markett, S. A. (2023) · Frontiers in Neuroimaging · doi:10.3389/fnimg.2022.1074674 · Cited by 6
Supramodal agnosia for oblique mirror orientation in patients with periventricular leukomalacia
Castaldi, E., Tinelli, F., Cicchini, G. M., & Morrone, M. C. (2018) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2018.03.010 · Cited by 6
Baker, J. M., Gillam, R. B., & Jordan, K. E. (2020) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105601 · Cited by 5
“, 2001), and the anterior IPS has been implicated in fine motor movements and grasping in space (Binkofski et al., 1998; Culham et al., 2003; Shikata et al., 2003).”
BackgroundCoding of 3D curvature in the parietal cortex (area CIP) of macaque monkey
Katsuyama, N., Naganuma, T., Sakata, H., & Taira, M. (2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/3-540-29344-2_27 · Cited by 4
I know where you'll look: an fMRI study of oculomotor intention and a change of motor plan
Kleiser, R., Konen, C. S., Seitz, R. J., & Bremmer, F. (2009) · Behavioral and Brain Functions · doi:10.1186/1744-9081-5-27 · Cited by 4
Peripersonal and extrapersonal space encoding in virtual reality: Insights from an fMRI study
Mertens, M., Binkofski, F., Leitão, B., Grii, B., Rodriguez‐Raecke, R., Schüppen, A., Pellicano, A., Lorentz, L., & Sijben, R. (2025) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121325 · Cited by 3
“…with previous studies in primates (Kusunoki, 1993; Orban, 2016; Shikata et al., 1996; Taira et al., 2000; Tsutsui et al., 2001; Tsutsui et al., 2002; Van Dromme et al., 2016) and human (Durand et al., 2009; Georgieva et al., 2009; Shikata et al., 2001; Shikata et al., 2003; Taira et al., 2001).”
Self-citationA neural network model of causative actions
Lee-Hand, J., & Knott, A. (2015) · Frontiers in Neurorobotics · doi:10.3389/fnbot.2015.00004 · Cited by 3
“The grasp pathway begins at the caudal intraparietal sulcus (cIPS) which represents the shape and orientation of observed objects(Shikata et al., 2003).”
BackgroundDorsal and Ventral Streams in the Sense of Touch
Gardner, E. P. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-805408-6.00354-7 · Cited by 1
Framing Visual Perception in Terms of Sensorimotor Mapping
Caiani, S. Z. (2014) · The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition Logic and Communication · doi:10.4148/1944-3676.1093 · Cited by 2
“Such evidence shows that the parietofrontal circuit comprising the AIP and the premotor cortex — also called the ventro-dorsal stream (Rizzolatti & Matelli 2003) — has a critical role in the extraction of visuomotor properties for object-oriented hand actions (Shikata et al. 2003).”
BackgroundMeasuring motor awareness and metacognition at the start, middle, and end of a reaching movement
Oancea, G., Maniscalco, B., Peters, M. A. K., & Chapman, C. S. (2025) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2025.103878 · Cited by 1
“Further, visual attention and visual guidance share common neural structures within the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) (Balauf & Deubel., 2010; Shikata et al., 2003).”
Through the Flat Canvas: The Motor Meaning of Realistic Paintings
Caiani, S. Z. (2016) · Aisthesis Pratiche linguaggi e saperi dell’estetico · doi:10.13128/aisthesis-19425 · Cited by 1
The neural and behavioral bases of active touch and tactile working memory
Kaas, A. L. (2006) · doi:10.26481/dis.20061020ak · Cited by 1
Valtonen, J. (2016) · Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja · Cited by 1
The development of number processing and its relation to other parietal functions in early childhood
Chinello, A. (2010) · Unitn-eprints PhD (University of Trento) · doi:10.15168/11572_368267
Spatial information processing in humans and monkeys
Oleksiak, A. (2005) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
Studying the human visual cortex for improving prehension capabilities in robotics.
Chinellato, E., Demiris, Y., & del Pobil, A. P. (2006)
An Ever-Developing Research Framework
Chinellato, E., & del Pobil, A. P. (2015) · Cognitive systems monographs · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20303-4_7
Baker, J. M. (2021) · Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) · doi:10.26076/500c-3439
fMRI Study of Pantomimed and Real Grasping What Does the Brain Do When You Fake It? An
Valyear, K. F., Gallivan, J. P., McLean, D. A., Culham, J. C., Tallant, J., Whitwell, R. L., & Buckingham, G. (2007)
Vision-Based Grasping, Where Robotics Meets Neuroscience
Chinellato, E., & del Pobil, A. P. (2015) · Cognitive systems monographs · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20303-4_4
Neurologie, A. A., & Weller, M. (2006)
Differential activation of the human brain during mental rotation paradigms, an fMRI study
Seurinck, R. (2007) · Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)
The neural basis of object perception : dissociating action and semantic processing
Lau, J. K. L. (2016) · University of Birmingham Institutional Research Archive (University of Birmingham)
Bimanual Grasping: An In-depth Examination of the Visual, Neural, and Motor Mechanisms
Le, A. (2015) · TSpace (University of Toronto)
A good grasp on intraparietal areas
López, J. C. (2003) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1124
Neural Mechanisms Underlying Action with Mirror Visual Feedback
Jegatheeswaran, G. (2019) · TSpace (University of Toronto)
Brown, H. R. (2014) · UCL Discovery (University College London)
Metadata
- Authors
- Shikata, E., Hamzei, F., Glauche, V., Koch, M., Weiller, C., Binkofski, F., & Büchel, C.
- Affiliations
- Nihon University (JP)
- Universität Hamburg (DE)
- University of Lübeck (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Büchel, Christian
- ORCID
- Venue
- European Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1105-1110
- ISSN
- 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
- 1460-9568
- OpenAlex
- W2000635135
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 5.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Volkswagen Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Keywords
- anterior intraparietal area, intraparietal sulcus, functional interactions, event-related fMRI
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain Mapping, Female, Hand, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Orientation, Parietal Lobe, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Radiography, Space Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
