The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional properties and interaction of the anterior and posterior intraparietal areas in humans
Abstract
In the monkey the lateral bank of the anterior part of the intraparietal sulcus (area AIP), contains neurons that are involved in visually guided, object‐related hand movements. It has also been shown that neurons in the caudal part of the intraparietal sulcus (area CIP) preferentially respond to 3D surface orientation. According to these results, it has been hypothesized that neurons in area CIP primarily encode the 3D features of an object and forwards this information to area AIP. AIP then utilizes this information for appropriate hand actions towards the object. Based on analogies to these primate studies, recent neuroimaging studies have suggested human homologues of areas AIP and CIP, however, the functional interaction between these areas remains unclear. Our event related fMRI study was designed to address specifically the question, how CIP and AIP interact in the process of adjustment of hand orientation towards objects. Volunteers were asked to perform three tasks: discrimination of surface orientation, imaging of visually guided hand movements and execution of visually guided hand movements. Our data show that the human AIP was activated both during discrimination of surface orientation and during the subsequent spatial adjustment of the thumb and index finger position towards the surface orientation. In contrast, human CIP was activated by the surface orientation but not by spatial adjustment of finger position. These data clearly indicate that the function of human CIP is more involved in coding 3D features of the objects, whereas human AIP is more involved in visually guided hand movements, similar to its role in the monkey.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Task-based fMRI investigation has identified a homologous region of primate AIP, which is activated by visually guided grasping (Shikata et al. 2003; Culham et al. 2003), but also in observation and imitation of movements (Mühlau et al. 2005), and observation of graspable objects (Chao and Martin 2000).”
From Neuroanatomical correlates of peripersonal space: bridging the gap between perception, action, emotion and social cognition (2024) · cites this paper as Shikata et al. 2003
Citations
Cites
Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. J., Poline, J. ‐., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460020402 · Cited by 9,688
Spatial registration and normalization of images
Friston, K. J., Ashburner, J., Frith, C., Poline, J.-B., Heather, J. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1995) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460030303 · Cited by 3,744
Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again
Worsley, K. J., & Friston, K. J. (1995) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1995.1023 · Cited by 2,198
The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control
Hopfinger, J. B., Buonocore, M. H., & Mangun, G. R. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/72999 · Cited by 1,876
Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex
Corbetta, M., Kincade, J. M., Ollinger, J. M., McAvoy, M. P., & Shulman, G. L. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/73009 · Cited by 1,816
A Common Network of Functional Areas for Attention and Eye Movements
Corbetta, M., Akbudak, E., Conturo, T. E., Snyder, A. Z., Ollinger, J. M., Drury, H. A., Linenweber, M. R., Petersen, S. E., Raichle, M. E., Essen, D. C. V., et al. (1998) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80593-0 · Cited by 1,644
Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation
Jeannerod, M., Arbib, M. A., Rizzolatti, G., & Sakata, H. (1995) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(95)93921-j · Cited by 1,399
Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography
Nobre, A. (1997) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/120.3.515 · Cited by 900
Murata, A., Gallese, V., Luppino, G., Kaseda, M., & Sakata, H. (2000) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.2000.83.5.2580 · Cited by 841
A fronto‐parietal circuit for object manipulation in man: evidence from an fMRI‐study
Binkofski, F., Buccino, G., Posse, S., Seitz, R. J., Rizzolatti, G., & Freund, H.-J. (1999) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00753.x · Cited by 731
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Kusunoki M., 1993, Selectivity of the parietal visual neurons in the axis orientation of objects in space, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 19, 770
- Talairach P., 1988, Stereotactic Coplanar Atlas of the Human Brain
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity
Thomas Yeo, B. T., Krienen, F. M., Sepulcre, J., Sabuncu, M. R., Lashkari, D., Hollinshead, M., Roffman, J. L., Smoller, J. W., Zöllei, L., Polimeni, J. R., et al. (2011) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00338.2011 · Cited by 9,182
“In cases where the peak activation coordinates were reported in the atlas space of Talairach and Tournoux (1988), the coordinates were first mapped to FSL MNI152 space (Lancaster et al.”
MethodThe organization of the human cerebellum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity
Buckner, R. L., Krienen, F. M., Castellanos, A., Diaz, J. C., & Yeo, B. T. T. (2011) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00339.2011 · Cited by 7,304
Understanding others' actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: a meta-analysis
Van Overwalle, F., & Baetens, K. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.009 · Cited by 1,329
Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex
Hubbard, E. M., Manuela Piazza, A., Pinel, P., & Dehaene, S. (2005) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1684 · Cited by 1,324
“Three of these putative homologues — areas LIP, VIP and AIP — are of particular relevance here, although other potential homologues have been identifie”
BackgroundREVIEW: The functional organization of the intraparietal sulcus in humans and monkeys
Grefkes, C., & Fink, G. R. (2005) · Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00426.x · Cited by 788
“By contrast, the activity in hCIP during surface orientation discrimination is not influenced by imagined or executed spatial finger adjustments, indicating that hCIP is likely to be concerned with coding 3D features of objects whereas hAIP is more involved in visually guided hand movements, as has been observed in ma…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Shikata, E., Hamzei, F., Glauche, V., Koch, M., Weiller, C., Binkofski, F., & Büchel, C.
- Affiliations
- Nihon University (JP)
- Universität Hamburg (DE)
- University of Lübeck (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Büchel, Christian
- ORCID
- Venue
- European Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1105-1110
- ISSN
- 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
- 1460-9568
- OpenAlex
- W2000635135
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 5.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Volkswagen Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Keywords
- anterior intraparietal area, intraparietal sulcus, functional interactions, event-related fMRI
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain Mapping, Female, Hand, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Orientation, Parietal Lobe, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Radiography, Space Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
