Cited by 1,329Action Observation and SynchronizationChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentFace Recognition and Perception

Understanding others' actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: a meta-analysis

Van Overwalle, Frank, Baetens, Kris·2009·NeuroImage

Abstract

This meta-analysis explores the role of the mirror and mentalizing systems in the understanding of other people's action goals. Based on over 200 fMRI studies, this analysis demonstrates that the mirror system - consisting of the anterior intraparietal sulcus and the premotor cortex - is engaged when one perceives articulated motions of body parts irrespective of their sensory (visual or auditory) or verbal format as well as when the perceiver executes them. This confirms the matching role of the mirror system in understanding biological action. Observation of whole-body motions and gaze engage the posterior superior temporal sulcus and most likely reflects an orientation response in line with the action or attention of the observed actor. In contrast, the mentalizing system - consisting of the temporo-parietal junction, the medial prefrontal cortex and the precuneus - is activated when behavior that enables inferences to be made about goals, beliefs or moral issues is presented in abstract terms (e.g., verbal stories or geometric shapes) and there is no perceivable biological motion of body parts. A striking overlap of brain activity at the temporo-parietal junction between social inferences and other, non-social observations (e.g., Posner's cuing task) suggests that this area computes the orientation or direction of the behavior in order to predict its likely end-state (or goal). No conclusions are drawn about the specific functionality of the precuneus and the medial prefrontal cortex. Because the mirror and mentalizing systems are rarely concurrently active, it appears that neither system subserves the other. Rather, they are complementary. There seems, however, to be a transition from the mirror to the mentalizing system even when body-part motions are observed by perceivers who are consciously deliberating about the goals of others and their behavioral executions, such as when perceived body motions are contextually inconsistent, implausible or pretended.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.009

Cites

238 of 238 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A meta-analysis of studies using mentalizing tasks concluded that classical mirror areas are not recruited unless the tasks involve action stimuli.

    “a meta-analysis of studies using mentalizing tasks concluded that classical mirror areas are not recruited unless the tasks involve action stimuli”

    From Mirror neurons: from origin to function (2014) · cites this paper as Van Overwalle & Baetens, 2009

  • Bilateral TPJ, mPPC, and mPFC are associated with mentalizing and Theory of Mind.

    “All three regions are associated with mentalizing and Theory of Mind (Scholz et al., 2009; Van Overwalle & Baetens, 2009), suggesting adolescents may be considering potential social evaluation by the peers who just excluded them and are currently watching their performance.”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Overwalle, F., & Baetens, K.
Affiliations
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
564-584
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061586925
Cited by
1,329
References
238
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 137 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 102 · 2017: 96 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 110 · 2014: 89 · 2013: 111 · 2012: 67
FWCI
6.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
mirror system, biological motion perception, anterior intraparietal sulcus, premotor cortex, posterior superior temporal sulcus, temporoparietal junction, medial prefrontal cortex, precuneus, social cognition, gaze direction, social inference, action observation
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Brain, Goals, Humans, Mental Processes, Psychomotor Performance, Social Perception, Visual Perception, Comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review