The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The exploitation of mutualisms
Abstract
Mutualisms (interspecific cooperative interactions) are ubiquitously exploited by organisms that obtain the benefits mutualists offer, while delivering no benefits in return. The natural history of these exploiters is well‐described, but relatively little effort has yet been devoted to analysing their ecological or evolutionary significance for mutualism. Exploitation is not a unitary phenomenon, but a set of loosely related phenomena: exploiters may follow mixed strategies or pure strategies at either the species or individual level, may or may not be derived from mutualists, and may or may not inflict significant costs on mutualisms. The evolutionary implications of these different forms of exploitation, especially the threats they pose to the stability of mutualism, have as yet been minimally explored. Studies of this issue are usually framed in terms of a “temptation to defect” that generates a destabilizing conflict of interest between partners. I argue that this idea is in fact rather inappropriate for interpreting most observed forms of exploitation in mutualisms. I suggest several alternative and testable ideas for how mutualism can persist in the face of exploitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The evolution of plant–insect mutualisms
Bronstein, J. L., Alarcón, R., & Geber, M. (2006) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01864.x · Cited by 538
Self-citationBeyond society: the evolution of organismality
Queller, D. C., & Strassmann, J. E. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0095 · Cited by 440
The evolutionary ecology of myco‐heterotrophy
Bidartondo, M. I. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01429.x · Cited by 311
Metabolic cross-feeding via intercellular nanotubes among bacteria
Pande, S., Shitut, S., Freund, L., Westermann, M., Bertels, F., Colesie, C., Bischofs, I. B., & Kost, C. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7238 · Cited by 273
Habitat conversion, extinction thresholds, and pollination services in agroecosystems
Keitt, T. H. (2009) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/08-0117.1 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Bronstein, J. L.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-05-30
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 277-287
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2040269786
- Cited by
- 516
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The exploitation of mutualisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00218.x
- The paper
- Bronstein, J. L. (2001). The exploitation of mutualisms. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00218.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.