Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 182

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Systemic Immunogenic Insults and Circulating Proinflammatory Cytokines on the Transcription of the Inhibitory Factor κBα Within Specific Cellular Populations of the Rat Brain

Laflamme, Nathalie, Rivest, Serge·1999·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

Abstract: Expression of the inhibitory factor κBα (IκBα) reflects the activity of nuclear factor κB(NF‐κB) and is a powerful tool to investigate the regulation of the transcription factor within the CNS. IκBα mRNA was evaluated in the rat brain by means of in situ hybridization following different immunogenic stimuli; i.e., intraperitoneal (i.p.) and intravenous (i.v.) lipopolysaccharide (LPS), i.v. recombinant rat interleukin (IL) 1β, IL‐6, or tumor necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α), and intramuscular (i.m.) turpentine injection, used here as a model of systemic localized inflammatory insult. Systemic LPS, IL‐1β, and TNF‐α caused a rapid and transient transcriptional activation of IκBα along the blood vessels of the entire brain; the signal was very intense 30‐60 min after the i.v. injections and returned to undetectable levels from 2 to 12 h depending on the challenge. Double‐labeling procedure provided the anatomical evidence that IκBα‐expressing cells within the microvasculature were essentially of the endothelial type, as they were immunoreactive to the von Willebrand factor. Scattered small cells were also found across the brain of LPS‐, IL‐1β‐, and TNF‐α‐injected rats at time 1‐3 h, and microglial (OX‐42)‐immunoreactive cells were positive for the transcript. Such expression within parenchymal microglia was nevertheless not observed in the brain following a localized and sterile inflammatory insult. Indeed, i.m. turpentine administration stimulated IκBα transcription quite uniquely within the endothelium of the brain capillaries, an effect that paralleled the swelling of the injection site and lasted up to 24 h after the aggression. In contrast to these immunogenic challenges, i.v. IL‐6 injection failed to activate the gene encoding IκBα in the rat brain. These results indicate that NF‐κB may play a crucial role in specific cellular populations of the CNS to trigger transcription of immune‐related genes and that IκBα resynthesis may act as a dynamic intracellular inhibitory feedback to avoid exaggeration of the response. It is possible that IκBα expression in cells of the blood‐brain barrier is a general mechanism that takes place during systemic inflammation, whereas the participation of NF‐κB‐related molecules within parenchymal cells of the CNS is solicited during more severe conditions such as blood sepsis and endotoxemia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.0730309.x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
Laflamme, N., & Rivest, S.
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-07
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
309-321
ISSN
  • 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-4159
OpenAlex
W1964846273
Cited by
182
References
7
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Systemic Immunogenic Insults and Circulating Proinflammatory Cytokines on the Transcription of the Inhibitory Factor κBα Within Specific Cellular Populations of the Rat Brain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.0730309.x
The paper
Laflamme, N., & Rivest, S. (1999). Effects of Systemic Immunogenic Insults and Circulating Proinflammatory Cytokines on the Transcription of the Inhibitory Factor κBα Within Specific Cellular Populations of the Rat Brain. Journal of Neurochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.0730309.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.