Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 189

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Normal values and standard deviations for pupil diameter and interpupillary distance in subjects aged 1 month to 19 years

MacLachlan, Colleen, Howland, Howard C.·2002·Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Abstract

Normal values of pupil diameters and interpupillary distances (PDs) were measured in a population of 1311 subjects (in 4294 visits) ranging from 1 month of age to slightly over 19 years of age. Subjects in this study were recruited from birth announcements in a local newspaper for a developmental vision project. Pupil sizes were measured photographically when the corneas were illuminated by 15.9 ± 0.5 lux ambient illumination (i.e. under mesopic conditions). Interpupillary distance was measured with an interocular distance rule while the subject fixated an object at 0.66 m distance. These PD measurements were corrected for systematic measurement errors and to an infinite viewing distance using radii of ocular rotation based on age‐dependent axial lengths. Means and S.D. were calculated for age, pupil diameter and PD for each 1‐year group of male and female subjects. The second order regression equation for average pupil size as a function of age was determined: [males pupil diameter (in mm)=5.83 + 0.181*age in years – 0053*age in years 2 , r 2 =0.897; female pupil diameter=5.40 + 0.285*age in years – 0.0109*age in years 2 , r 2 =0.945]. The difference between male and female pupil sizes (mean male – female=0.13 mm) was marginally not significant ( p < 0.054). The average corrected PDs as a function of age were found to approximate another second‐order regression equation: (males PD=43.36 + 1.663*age in years – 0.034*age in years 2 , r 2 =0.986; females PD=41.76 + 1.891*age in years – 0.052*age in years 2 , r 2 =0.986). Male PD was wider than female PD by an average of 1.58 mm ( p < 0.0003). As expected, the results of this study were similar to a preliminary investigation conducted by Thunyalukul et al. [ Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 37 (1996) S731] on a portion of the present data set, and also very similar to data from another study of comparable racial composition using a different measurement method [Pryor, Pediatrics 44 (1969) 973]. It was concluded that pupil diameter and PD increase more gradually than axial length of the eye in the first few years of life. The normal values and S.D. for both pupil size and PD determined in this study have important clinical implications as well as applications in the optical industry.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00023.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 189

Metadata

Authors
MacLachlan, C., & Howland, H. C.
Venue
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
Published
2002-04-29
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
175-182
ISSN
  • 0275-5408 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-1313
OpenAlex
W2074274620
Cited by
189
References
0
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Normal values and standard deviations for pupil diameter and interpupillary distance in subjects aged 1 month to 19 years. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00023.x
The paper
MacLachlan, C., & Howland, H. C. (2002). Normal values and standard deviations for pupil diameter and interpupillary distance in subjects aged 1 month to 19 years. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00023.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.