The DOI matches its Crossref record.
GIS‐Generated, Expert‐Based Models for Identifying Wildlife Habitat Linkages and Planning Mitigation Passages
Abstract
Abstract: We developed three black bear ( Ursus americanus ) habitat models in the context of a geographic information system to identify linkage areas across a major transportation corridor. One model was based on empirical habitat data, and the other two (opinion‐ and literature‐based) were based on expert information developed in a multicriteria decision‐making process. We validated the performance of the models with an independent data set. Four classes of highway linkage zones were generated. Class 3 linkages were the most accurate for mapping cross‐highway movement. Our tests showed that the model based on expert literature most closely approximated the empirical model, both in the results of statistical tests and the description of the class 3 linkages. In addition, the expert literature–based model was consistently more similar to the empirical model than either of two seasonal, expert opinion–based models. Among the expert models, the literature‐based model had the strongest correlation with the empirical model. Expert‐opinion models were less in agreement with the empirical model. The poor performance of the expert‐opinion model may be explained by an overestimation of the importance of riparian habitat by experts compared with the literature. A small portion of the empirical data to test the models was from the pre‐berry season and may have affected how well the model predicted linkage areas. Our empirical and expert models represent useful tools for resource and transportation planners charged with determining the location of mitigation passages for wildlife when baseline information is lacking and when time constraints do not allow for data collection before construction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
McRae, B. H. (2006) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb00500.x · Cited by 1,081
Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review
Zeller, K. A., McGarigal, K., & Whiteley, A. R. (2012) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-012-9737-0 · Cited by 1,007
SPEAR, S. F., BALKENHOL, N., FORTIN, M., MCRAE, B. H., & SCRIBNER, K. (2010) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2010.04657.x · Cited by 598
Forks in the Road: Choices in Procedures for Designing Wildland Linkages
BEIER, P., MAJKA, D. R., & SPENCER, W. D. (2008) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00942.x · Cited by 489
The sensitivity of least-cost habitat graphs to relative cost surface values
Rayfield, B., Fortin, M.-J., & Fall, A. (2010) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-009-9436-7 · Cited by 229
Biological corridors and connectivity
Cushman, S. A., McRae, B., Adriaensen, F., Beier, P., Shirley, M., & Zeller, K. (2013) · Key Topics in Conservation Biology 2 · doi:10.1002/9781118520178.ch21 · Cited by 179
McClure, M. L., Hansen, A. J., & Inman, R. M. (2016) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-016-0347-0 · Cited by 166
Uncertainty analysis of least‐cost modeling for designing wildlife linkages
Beier, P., Majka, D. R., & Newell, S. L. (2009) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/08-1898.1 · Cited by 158
Comparing Habitat Suitability and Connectivity Modeling Methods for Conserving Pronghorn Migrations
Poor, E. E., Loucks, C., Jakes, A., & Urban, D. L. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049390 · Cited by 120
Predicting Hot Spots of Herpetofauna Road Mortality Along Highway Networks
LANGEN, T. A., OGDEN, K. M., & SCHWARTING, L. L. (2009) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2193/2008-017 · Cited by 117
Beier, P., Penrod, K. L., Luke, C., Spencer, W. D., & Cabañero, C. (2006) · Connectivity Conservation · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511754821.025 · Cited by 48
Alonso-F., A. M., Finegan, B., Brenes, C., Günter, S., & Palomeque, X. (2017) · Caldasia · doi:10.15446/caldasia.v39n1.64324 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Clevenger, A. P., Wierzchowski, J., Chruszcz, B., & Gunson, K.
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 503-514
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W2155695434
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.