Cited by 9Advanced DC-DC ConvertersElectric and Hybrid Vehicle TechnologiesMultilevel Inverters and Converters

Reduced component, buck–boost converter for plug-in electric vehicles with a current sensing-based efficient NLCC technique

Open access
Mishra, Anjanee Kumar, Singh, Ankit Kumar, Kim, Taehyung·2020·IET Power Electronics

Abstract

This work proposes a cost effective with a compact power electronic interface for plug‐in electric vehicles (PEVs), which has the ability to achieve the all modes of vehicle operation, including plug‐in charging, propulsion (PR) and regenerative braking (RB) for on‐board applications. The proposed converter for PEVs has minimum component count as well as step‐up and step‐down operation ability depending upon the system requirement. The capability of the proposed converter to work in both the modes allows wide range of battery parameters selection, efficient DC‐link voltage regulation and offers more flexibility in RB. Moreover, a current sensing based (without voltage sensor) non‐linear carrier control (NLCC) technique for power factor correction has also developed in this work. This control scheme improves the reliability and stability of system by reducing the feedback circuitry. A prototype of the proposed charging system is established and analysed to an authenticate the effectiveness of developed system under steady state and dynamic conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1049/iet-pel.2020.0003

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The converter in [106] results in improvement of the power density and efficiency (97.2%) of the EV powertrain.

    “It also results in improvement of the power density and efficiency (97.2%) of the EV powertrain.”

    From On-Board Chargers for Electric Vehicles: A Comprehensive Performance and Efficiency Review (2024) · cites this paper as [106]

    The Conclusion (p. 10) says the converter improves the EV powertrain’s volumetric power density. It also reports 97.2% as the converter’s maximum efficiency in regenerative-braking mode, not as the efficiency of the EV powertrain overall; the other two modes have lower maxima. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The researchers in [106] proposed a DC-DC converter with a single-stage configuration capable of achieving all three modes of operation: plug-in charging, propulsion (PR), and regenerative braking (RB) for on-board applications.

    “The suggested converter is a DC-DC converter with a single-stage configuration capable of achieving all the three modes of operation, plug-in charging, propulsion (PR), and regenerative braking (RB) for on-board applications.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [41][41] Tang, W., Lee, F.C., Ridley, R.B.: 'Small-signal modeling of average currentmode control', IEEE Trans. Power Electron. , 1993, 8 , (2), pp. 112-119 -
  2. [46][46] Erickson, M.D.R.W.: ' Fundamental of power electronics ' (Springer, New Delhi, 2005)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mishra, A. K., Singh, A. K., & Kim, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan–Dearborn (US)
  • Department of Electrical and Instrumentation Engineering TIET Patiala 147004 India
Corresponding author
Mishra, Anjanee Kumar
Venue
IET Power Electronics
Published
2020-10-07
Volume
13
Issue
16
Pages
3753-3763
ISSN
  • 1755-4535 (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-4543
OpenAlex
W3092638122
Cited by
9
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IET Power Electronics (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Michigan Library
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced DC-DC Converters
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Multilevel Inverters and Converters
Keywords
buck-boost converter, plug-in electric vehicles, power factor correction, current sensing, regenerative braking, DC-DC converter, DC bus voltage regulation, component count reduction, vehicle charging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review