Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 0

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative Analysis of Transient Characteristics of Gate Driver Topologies in Paralleled Silicon Carbide Power Modules

Li, Yan, Yuan, Xibo, Xiu, Delong, Ning, Yuhao, Zhang, Yonglei, Jahdi, Saeed, Tan, Guojun, Wang, Kai, Zhou, Wenzhi·2026·IET Power Electronics

Abstract

Due to the extremely fast switching speed and low on‐resistance of silicon carbide (SiC) MOSFETs, their parallel interconnection is prone to current imbalance caused by mismatched parasitic parameters and inconsistent gate signals in the parallel branches. Especially for paralleled structures consisting of multiple high‐power SiC power modules, achieving a symmetrical, parameter‐matched circuit design is challenging due to constraints such as heat dissipation and spatial limitations. Furthermore, increased spacing between parallel modules increases parasitic inductance in the power loop as well as the gate drive loop, potentially inducing gate voltage oscillations. Thus, ensuring current sharing and operational stability in multi‐module paralleled structures remain critical challenges. In this article, the current sharing principle of paralleled SiC devices is analysed, and a symmetrical DC/AC busbar structure is proposed for three parallel 1200 V/300 A SiC modules to achieve current balancing during conduction. Based on this structure, the transient current sharing of three gate driver topologies is compared, and the gate voltage oscillation principle affecting operational stability is analysed. Finally, the applicability of these gate driver topologies for multi‐device parallel structures is evaluated, and a hardware solution is summarised to facilitate current sharing and stable operation of parallel SiC MOSFET modules.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1049/pel2.70242

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. 10.1109/TPEL.2020.3024862 · DOI
  2. 10.1109/TPEL.2018.2834345 · DOI
  3. 10.1109/TIE.2017.2652401 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1109/TPEL.2013.2283245 · DOI
  5. 10.1109/TIA.2021.3087546 · DOI
  6. 10.1109/TPEL.2015.2408054 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1109/TPEL.2019.2954716 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1109/TPEL.2020.3002188 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/TPEL.2016.2639327 · DOI
  10. Y.Mukunoki T.Horiguchi andA.Nishizawa “Electro‐Thermal Co‐Simulation of Two Parallel‐Connected SiC‐MOSFETs Under Thermally‐Imbalanced Conditions ” in2018 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)(March 2018) 2855–2860. · DOI
  11. F.XuandL.Chen “Suppressing Gate Voltage Oscillation in Paralleled SiC MOSFETs for HEV/EV Traction Inverter Application ” inProceedings of the IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE)(IEEE 2019) 3548–3553. · DOI
  12. J.Ke Z.Zhao P.Sun H.Huang J.Abuogo andX.Cui “New Screening Method for Improving Transient Current Sharing of Paralleled SiC MOSFETs ” in2018 International Power Electronics Conference (IPEC‐Niigata 2018 ‐ECCE Asia)(IEEE 2018) 1125–1130. · DOI
  13. 10.1109/TPEL.2025.3569790 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/TPEL.2020.2978718 · DOI
  15. 10.1049/pel2.12211 · DOI
  16. 10.1109/TIE.2017.2716868 · DOI
  17. J.LiuandZ.Zheng “Switching Current Imbalance Mitigation for Paralleled SiC MOSFETs Using Common‐Mode Choke in Gate Loop ” inProceedings of the IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition 2020(IEEE 2020) 705–710. · DOI
  18. 10.1109/TIE.2019.2901655 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1109/TPEL.2024.3369635 · DOI
  20. 10.1109/TIE.2024.3443969 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/TPEL.2020.3006071 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1109/TIA.2015.2456422 · DOI
  23. D. H.Lu H.Takubo S.Takano andY.Suzuki “Paralleling Six 320A 1200 V All‐SiC Half‐Bridge Modules for a Large Capacity Power Stack ” in2018 International Power Electronics Conference (IPEC‐Niigata 2018 ‐ECCE Asia)(IEEE 2018) 3390–3395. · DOI
  24. Fabre J., 2016, Parallel Connection of 1200‐V/100‐A SiC‐MOSFET Half‐Bridge Modules, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 52, 1669
  25. 10.1109/TPEL.2012.2195332 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Li, Y., Yuan, X., Xiu, D., Ning, Y., Zhang, Y., Jahdi, S., Tan, G., Wang, K., & Zhou, W.
Venue
IET Power Electronics
Published
2026-01
Volume
19
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1755-4535
  • 1755-4543
Cited by
0
References
1
Language
en
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFE0115900)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (52177201)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.