The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Constraints on intrinsic alignment contamination of weak lensing surveys using the MegaZ-LRG sample
Open accessAbstract
Correlations between the intrinsic shapes of galaxies and the large-scale galaxy density field provide an important tool to investigate galaxy intrinsic alignments, which constitute the major potential astrophysical systematic in cosmological weak lensing (cosmic shear) surveys, but also yield insight into the formation and evolution of galaxies. We measure galaxy position-shape correlations in the MegaZ-LRG sample for more than 800 000 luminous red galaxies for comoving transverse separations of 0.3 < rp < 60 h-1 Mpc, making the first such measurement with a photometric redshift sample. In combination with a re-analysis of several spectroscopic SDSS samples, we constrain an intrinsic alignment model for early-type galaxies over long baselines in redshift (z ≲ 0.7) and luminosity (4 mag) with high statistical precision. We develop and test the formalism to incorporate photometric redshift scatter in the modelling of these observations. For rp > 6 h-1 Mpc, the fits to galaxy position-shape correlation functions are consistent with the scaling with rp and redshift of a revised, nonlinear version of the linear alignment model (Hirata & Seljak 2004) for all samples. An extra redshift dependence ∝ (1 + z)ηother is constrained to ηother = −0.3 ± 0.8 (1σ). To obtain consistent amplitudes for all data, an additional dependence on galaxy luminosity ∝ Lβ with is required. The normalisation of the intrinsic alignment power spectrum is found to be for galaxies at redshift 0.3 and r band magnitude of − 22 (k- and evolution-corrected to z = 0). Assuming zero intrinsic alignments for blue galaxies, we assess the bias on cosmological parameters for a tomographic CFHTLS-like lensing survey given our new constraints on the intrinsic alignment model parameter space. Both the resulting mean bias and its uncertainty are smaller than the 1σ statistical errors when using the constraints from all samples combined. The addition of MegaZ-LRG data is critical to achieving constraints this strong, reducing the uncertainty in intrinsic alignment bias on cosmological parameters by factors of three to seven.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305772 · Cited by 15,126
THE SEVENTH DATA RELEASE OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY
Abazajian, K. N., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Agüeros, M. A., Allam, S. S., Prieto, C. A., An, D., Anderson, K. S. J., Anderson, S. F., Annis, J., Bahcall, N. A., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 · Cited by 5,341
Self-citationThe Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric System
Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J. E., Doi, M., Shimasaku, K., & Schneider, D. P. (1996) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/117915 · Cited by 3,033
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric Camera
Gunn, J. E., Carr, M., Rockosi, C., Sekiguchi, M., Berry, K., Elms, B., de Haas, E., Ivezić, Ž., Knapp, G., Lupton, R., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300645 · Cited by 1,692
Bridle, S., & King, L. (2007) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/12/444 · Cited by 492
Self-citationSystematic errors in future weak-lensing surveys: requirements and prospects for self-calibration
Huterer, D., Takada, M., Bernstein, G., & Jain, B. (2006) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09782.x · Cited by 409 · cited 1×
“With the Fisher matrix, one can calculate the bias on a cosmological parameter via (e.g. Kim et al. 2004; Huterer & Takada 2005; Huterer et al. 2006; Taylor et al. 2007; Amara & Réfrégier 2008; Kitching et al. 2009; Joachimi & Schneider 2009) b(pµ) = ∑ ν ( F−1 ) µν ∑ ℓ,i≤ j,k≤l [ C(i j)II (ℓ) +C (i…”
Method
Cited by
KiDS-450: cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing
Hildebrandt, H., Viola, M., Heymans, C., Joudaki, S., Kuijken, K., Blake, C., Erben, T., Joachimi, B., Klaes, D., Miller, L., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2805 · Cited by 1,021
Self-citationThe Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy – an overview
(2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw641 · Cited by 1,019
Heymans, C., Tröster, T., Asgari, M., Blake, C., Hildebrandt, H., Joachimi, B., Kuijken, K., Lin, C.-A., Sánchez, A. G., van den Busch, J. L., et al. (2021) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039063 · Cited by 772
Self-citationCFHTLenS: the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey
Heymans, C., Van Waerbeke, L., Miller, L., Erben, T., Hildebrandt, H., Hoekstra, H., Kitching, T. D., Mellier, Y., Simon, P., Bonnett, C., et al. (2012) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21952.x · Cited by 718
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear
Troxel, M. A., MacCrann, N., Zuntz, J., Eifler, T. F., Krause, E., Dodelson, S., Gruen, D., Blazek, J., Friedrich, O., Samuroff, S., et al. (2018) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.043528 · Cited by 656
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Joachimi, B., Mandelbaum, R., Abdalla, F. B., & Bridle, S. L.
- Venue
- Astronomy & Astrophysics
- Publisher
- EDP Sciences
- Published
- 2011-01-20
- Volume
- 527
- Pages
- A26
- ISSN
- 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0746
- OpenAlex
- W2111716398
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 4.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Constraints on intrinsic alignment contamination of weak lensing surveys using the MegaZ-LRG sample. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1051/0004-6361/201015621
- The paper
- Joachimi, B., Mandelbaum, R., Abdalla, F. B., & Bridle, S. L. (2011). Constraints on intrinsic alignment contamination of weak lensing surveys using the MegaZ-LRG sample. Astronomy & Astrophysics. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201015621
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.