Cited by 81Astrophysics and Star Formation StudiesStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

Recent star formation in the inner Galactic bulge seen by ISOGAL: II. The central molecular zone

Open access
Immer, K., Schuller, F., Omont, A., Menten, K. M.·2012·Astronomy & Astrophysics

Abstract

We present 5–38 μm spectroscopic observations of a sample of 68 ISOGAL sources with unknown natures, taken with the Spitzer Infrared Spectrograph. Based on the characteristics and the slope of their spectra, we classified the sources as young or late-type evolved objects. These sources were selected to test selection criteria based on the ISOGAL [7]–[15] color and the spatial extent parameter σ15. We revised these criteria until they reliably distinguished between young and late-type evolved objects and then applied them to all ISOGAL sources in the central molecular zone (CMZ), resulting in the selection of 485 sources believed to be young. Furthermore, we added 656 Midcourse Space Experiment (MSX) sources to the CMZ sample that fulfilled FE/FD > 2 with FD and FE being the flux densities in the D (15 μm) and E (21 μm) bands. After obtaining conversion factors, we calculated the bolometric luminosity, Lbol, values for the CMZ sample and subsequently the masses of the sources. Applying a Kroupa initial mass function, we derived the total mass in young objects that have been formed over the last 1 Myr, resulting in an average star formation rate of 0.08 solar masses per year for the CMZ.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/0004-6361/201117857

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This YSO-based SFR value was later updated to 0.05-0.08 M⊙/yr due to contamination by main sequence stars.

    “This value was later updated to 0 . 05 -0 . 08 M ⊙ yr -1 due to contamination by main sequence stars (An et al. 2011; Immer et al. 2012; Koepferl et al. 2015; Nandakumar et al. 2018).”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Immer et al. 2012

    Section 3.2.5 reports a YSO-based star formation rate of 0.08 M⊙/yr, supporting the upper end of the cited range. It does not report 0.05 M⊙/yr or say the rate was updated because of main-sequence-star contamination; sections 2.4 and 3.2.3 instead discuss contamination by non-young objects, particularly late evolved stars. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bhattacharya, A., Joardar, S., & Bhattacharya, R. 2008, A&A (Infinity Science Press LLC)
  2. Eddington, A. S. 1926, The Internal Constitution of the Stars (Cambridge University Press)
  3. Houck, J. R., Roellig, T. L., Van Cleve, J., et al. 2004, in SPIE Conf. Ser. 5487, ed. J. C. Mather, 62
  4. Quirico, E., Raynal, P., Borg, J., et al. 2000, in Lunar and Planetary Inst. Technical Report, Lunar and Planetary Institute Science Conference Abstracts, 31, 1260

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Immer, K., Schuller, F., Omont, A., & Menten, K. M.
Affiliations
  • Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy (DE)
Venue
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2012-01
Volume
537
Pages
A121
ISSN
  • 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0746
OpenAlex
W2019112354
Cited by
81
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
star formation rate, Central Molecular Zone, Galactic bulge, mid-infrared spectroscopy, young stellar objects, source selection criteria, bolometric luminosity, Kroupa initial mass function, Spitzer Infrared Spectrograph

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review