Cited by 96Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesNuclear physics research studiesGamma-ray bursts and supernovae

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rubidium, zirconium, and lithium production in intermediate-mass asymptotic giant branch stars

Open access

Abstract

Context. A recent survey of a large sample of Galactic intermediate-mass (>3 M⊙) asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars shows that they exhibit large overabundances of rubidium (Rb) up to 100–1000 times solar. In contrast, zirconium (Zr) is not enriched in these stars compared to its solar abundances. These observations set constraints on our theoretical notion of the slow neutron capture process (s process) that occurs inside intermediate-mass AGB stars. Lithium (Li) abundances are also reported for these stars. In intermediate-mass AGB stars, Li can be produced by proton captures occuring at the base of the convective envelope. For this reason the observations of Rb, Zr, and Li set complementary constraints on different processes occurring in the same stars.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/0004-6361/201117896

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stellar evolution models are able to account for the magnitude of the Li-enrichment observed in intermediate-mass AGB stars.

    “Stellar evolution models are able to account for the magnitude of the Li-enrichment observed in intermediate-mass AGB stars, even though there are considerable modelling uncertainties (van Raai et al. 2012; Garc´ ıa-Hern´ andez et al. 2013).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. Abia, 1993, A&A, 272, 455
  2. Abia, 2001, ApJ, 559, 1117, 10.1086/322383 · DOI
  3. Anders, 1989, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 53, 197, 10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-X · DOI
  4. Angulo, 1999, Nuclear Phys. A, 656, 3, 10.1016/S0375-9474(99)00030-5 · DOI
  5. Arlandini, 1999, ApJ, 525, 886, 10.1086/307938 · DOI
  6. Asplund, 2005, ARA&A, 43, 481, 10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134001 · DOI
  7. Bao, 2000, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, 76, 70, 10.1006/adnd.2000.0838 · DOI
  8. Beer, 1991, ApJ, 375, 823, 10.1086/170246 · DOI
  9. Beer, 1989, ApJ, 339, 962, 10.1086/167351 · DOI
  10. Boothroyd, 1993, ApJ, 416, 762, 10.1086/173275 · DOI
  11. Busso, 1999, ARA&A, 37, 239, 10.1146/annurev.astro.37.1.239 · DOI
  12. Busso, 2001, ApJ, 557, 802, 10.1086/322258 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Cameron, 1977, Icarus, 30, 447, 10.1016/0019-1035(77)90101-4 · DOI
  14. Cannon, 1993, MNRAS, 263, 817, 10.1093/mnras/263.4.817 · DOI
  15. Collet, 2011, A&A, 528, A32, 10.1051/0004-6361/201016151 · DOI
  16. Federman, 2004, ApJ, 603, L105, 10.1086/383225 · DOI
  17. Frost, 1996, ApJ, 473, 383, 10.1086/178152 · DOI
  18. Gallino, 1998, ApJ, 497, 388, 10.1086/305437 · DOI
  19. García-Hernández, 2006, Science, 314, 1751, 10.1126/science.1133706 · DOI · Paper page
  20. García-Hernández, 2007, A&A, 462, 711, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065785 · DOI
  21. García-Hernández, 2009, ApJ, 705, L31, 10.1088/0004-637X/705/1/L31 · DOI
  22. Goriely, 1999, A&A, 342, 881
  23. Goriely, 2000, A&A, 362, 599
  24. Heil, 2008, Phys. Rev. C, 78, 025802, 10.1103/PhysRevC.78.025802 · DOI
  25. Herwig, 2004, ApJ, 605, 425, 10.1086/382200 · DOI
  26. Herwig, 2005, ARA&A, 43, 435, 10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150600 · DOI
  27. Hollowell, 1990, ApJ, 351, 245, 10.1086/168459 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Iben, 1975, ApJ, 196, 525, 10.1086/153433 · DOI
  29. Iben, 1983, ARA&A, 21, 271, 10.1146/annurev.aa.21.090183.001415 · DOI
  30. Iliadis, 2010, Nuclear Phys. A, 841, 31, 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2010.04.009 · DOI
  31. Käppeler, 1989, Rep. Progress Phys., 52, 945, 10.1088/0034-4885/52/8/002 · DOI
  32. Karakas, 2010, MNRAS, 403, 1413, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16198.x · DOI
  33. Karakas, 2003, PASA, 20, 279, 10.1071/AS03010 · DOI
  34. Karakas, 2006, ApJ, 643, 471, 10.1086/502793 · DOI
  35. Karakas, 2009, ApJ, 690, 1130, 10.1088/0004-637X/690/2/1130 · DOI
  36. Karakas, 2010, Mem. Soc. Astron. It., 81, 1010
  37. Lambert, 1976, The Observatory, 96, 100
  38. Lambert, 1995, ApJ, 450, 302, 10.1086/176141 · DOI
  39. Lattanzio, 1986, ApJ, 311, 708, 10.1086/164810 · DOI
  40. Lind, 2011, A&A, 528, A103, 10.1051/0004-6361/201016095 · DOI
  41. Lodders, 2003, ApJ, 591, 1220, 10.1086/375492 · DOI
  42. Lugaro, M., & Chieffi, A. 2011, in Lecture Notes in Physics, ed. R. Diehl, D. H. Hartmann, & N. Prantzos (Berlin: Springer Verlag), 812, 83
  43. Lugaro, 2003, ApJ, 586, 1305, 10.1086/367887 · DOI
  44. Lugaro, 2004, ApJ, 615, 934, 10.1086/424559 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Lugaro, 2007, A&A, 461, 657, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065768 · DOI
  46. Meyer, 1994, ARA&A, 32, 153, 10.1146/annurev.aa.32.090194.001101 · DOI
  47. Plez, 1993, ApJ, 418, 812, 10.1086/173438 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Reimers, D. 1975, Circumstellar envelopes and mass loss of red giant stars (New York: Springer-Verlag), 229 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Siess, 2004, A&A, 415, 1089, 10.1051/0004-6361:20034281 · DOI
  50. Simmerer, 2004, ApJ, 617, 1091, 10.1086/424504 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Smith, 1990, ApJ, 361, L69, 10.1086/185829 · DOI
  52. Stancliffe, 2007, MNRAS, 375, 1280, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11363.x · DOI
  53. Straniero, 1997, ApJ, 478, 332, 10.1086/303794 · DOI
  54. Straniero, 2000, Mem. Soc. Astron. Italiana, 71, 719
  55. Travaglio, 2004, ApJ, 601, 864, 10.1086/380507 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Vassiliadis, 1993, ApJ, 413, 641, 10.1086/173033 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Ventura, 2005, A&A, 431, 279, 10.1051/0004-6361:20041917 · DOI
  58. Ventura, 2005, A&A, 439, 1075, 10.1051/0004-6361:20042396 · DOI
  59. Ventura, 2000, A&A, 363, 605
  60. Wood, 1983, ApJ, 272, 99, 10.1086/161265 · DOI
  61. Yong, 2006, ApJ, 639, 918, 10.1086/499580 · DOI
  62. Yong, 2008, ApJ, 689, 1031, 10.1086/592600 · DOI
  63. Yong, 2008, ApJ, 673, 854, 10.1086/524376 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
van Raai, M. A., Lugaro, M., Karakas, A. I., García-Hernández, D. A., & Yong, D.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Mount Stromlo Observatory (AU)
  • Universidad de La Laguna (ES)
Venue
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2012-03-22
Volume
540
Pages
A44
ISSN
  • 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0746
OpenAlex
W2148597012
Cited by
96
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Nuclear physics research studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Keywords
rubidium, zirconium, lithium, s-process nucleosynthesis, slow neutron capture, proton capture, convective envelope, stellar nucleosynthesis, chemical abundances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review