The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probabilistic mass-mapping with neural score estimation
Open accessAbstract
Context.Weak lensing mass-mapping is a useful tool for accessing the full distribution of dark matter on the sky, but because of intrinsic galaxy ellipticies, finite fields, and missing data, the recovery of dark matter maps constitutes a challenging, ill-posed inverse problem Aims.We introduce a novel methodology that enables the efficient sampling of the high-dimensional Bayesian posterior of the weak lensing mass-mapping problem, relying on simulations to define a fully non-Gaussian prior. We aim to demonstrate the accuracy of the method to simulated fields, and then proceed to apply it to the mass reconstruction of the HST/ACS COSMOS field. Methods.The proposed methodology combines elements of Bayesian statistics, analytic theory, and a recent class of deep generative models based on neural score matching. This approach allows us to make full use of analytic cosmological theory to constrain the 2pt statistics of the solution, to understand any differences between this analytic prior and full simulations from cosmological simulations, and to obtain samples from the full Bayesian posterior of the problem for robust uncertainty quantification. Results.We demonstrate the method in the κ TNG simulations and find that the posterior mean significantly outperfoms previous methods (Kaiser–Squires, Wiener filter, Sparsity priors) both for the root-mean-square error and in terms of the Pearson correlation. We further illustrate the interpretability of the recovered posterior by establishing a close correlation between posterior convergence values and the S/N of the clusters artificially introduced into a field. Finally, we apply the method to the reconstruction of the HST/ACS COSMOS field, which yields the highest-quality convergence map of this field to date. Conclusions.We find the proposed approach to be superior to previous algorithms, scalable, providing uncertainties, and using a fully non-Gaussian prior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404
LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products
Ivezić, Ž., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., Abel, B., Acosta, E., Allsman, R., Alonso, D., AlSayyad, Y., Anderson, S. F., Andrew, J., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c · Cited by 4,357
Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis
Dhariwal, P., & Nichol, A. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.05233 · Cited by 3,362
Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics
Sohl-Dickstein, J., Weiss, E. A., Maheswaranathan, N., & Ganguli, S. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.03585 · Cited by 2,637
Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations
Song, Y., Sohl-Dickstein, J., Kingma, D. P., Kumar, A., Ermon, S., & Poole, B. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.13456 · Cited by 1,953
A Connection Between Score Matching and Denoising Autoencoders
Vincent, P. (2011) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_00142 · Cited by 1,011
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 93
- Ajani, 2021, A&A, 645, L11, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039988 · DOI
- Alain G., & Bengio Y. 2013, in 1st International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2013 - Conference Track Proceedings, 15, 3743
- Alsing, 2016, MNRAS, 455, 4452, 10.1093/mnras/stv2501 · DOI
- Anderson, 1982, Stochast. Process. Appl., 12, 313, 10.1016/0304-4149(82)90051-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Robitaille, 2013, A&A, 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 · DOI · Paper page
- Price-Whelan, 2018, AJ, 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aac387 · DOI
- Bartelmann, 2010, Class. Quant. Grav., 27, 233001, 10.1088/0264-9381/27/23/233001 · DOI
- Betancourt M. 2017, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1701.02434] · arXiv
- Bobin, 2012, Adv. Astron., 2012, 703217, 10.1155/2012/703217 · DOI
- Cheng, 2020, MNRAS, 499, 5902, 10.1093/mnras/staa3165 · DOI
- Clowe, 2012, ApJ, 758, 128, 10.1088/0004-637X/758/2/128 · DOI · Paper page
- Dillon J. V., Langmore I., Tran D., et al. 2017, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1711.10604] · arXiv
- Elsner, 2013, A&A, 549, A111, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220586 · DOI
- Erben, 2001, A&A, 366, 717, 10.1051/0004-6361:20010013 · DOI
- Fiedorowicz, 2022, MNRAS, 512, 73, 10.1093/mnras/stac468 · DOI
- Finoguenov, 2007, ApJS, 172, 182, 10.1086/516577 · DOI
- Girolami, 2011, J. R. Statist. Soc.: Ser. B (Statist. Methodol.), 73, 123, 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00765.x · DOI · Paper page
- Goodfellow I. J., Pouget-Abadie J., Mirza M., et al. 2014, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1406.2661] · arXiv
- Gouk, 2020, Mach. Learn., 110, 393, 10.1007/s10994-020-05929-w · DOI
- Harnois-Déraps, 2021, MNRAS, 506, 1623, 10.1093/mnras/stab1623 · DOI
- Harris, 2020, Nature, 585, 357, 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Hastings, 1970, Biometrika, 57, 97, 10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 · DOI · Paper page
- He K., Zhang X., Ren S., & Sun J. 2016, Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 770
- Ho, 2020, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 33, 6840
- Hoekstra, 1998, ApJ, 504, 636, 10.1086/306102 · DOI
- Horowitz, 2019, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 10, 035, 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/10/035 · DOI
- Hunter, 2007, Comput. Sci. Eng., 9, 90, 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 · DOI · Paper page
- Ilbert, 2009, ApJ, 690, 1236, 10.1088/0004-637X/690/2/1236 · DOI
- Jee, 2012, ApJ, 747, 96, 10.1088/0004-637X/747/2/96 · DOI
- Jeffrey, 2018, MNRAS, 479, 2871, 10.1093/mnras/sty1252 · DOI
- Jeffrey, 2018, Astron. Comput., 25, 230, 10.1016/j.ascom.2018.10.001 · DOI
- Jeffrey, 2020, MNRAS, 501, 954, 10.1093/mnras/staa3594 · DOI · Paper page
- Jeffrey, 2020, MNRAS, 492, 5023, 10.1093/mnras/staa127 · DOI
- Jimenez Rezende D., Mohamed S., & Wierstra D. 2014, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1401.4082] · arXiv
- Jolicoeur-Martineau A., Piché-Taillefer R., des Combes R. T., & Mitliagkas I. 2020, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:2009.05475] · arXiv
- Kacprzak, 2016, MNRAS, 463, 3653, 10.1093/mnras/stw2070 · DOI
- Kaiser, 1993, ApJ, 404, 441, 10.1086/172297 · DOI
- Kaiser, 1995, ApJ, 449, 460, 10.1086/176071 · DOI
- Kilbinger, 2015, Rep. Progr. Phys., 78, 086901, 10.1088/0034-4885/78/8/086901 · DOI · Paper page
- Kingma D. P., & Welling M. 2013, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1312.6114] · arXiv
- Kurita, 2021, MNRAS, 501, 833, 10.1093/mnras/staa3625 · DOI
- Lahav, 1994, ApJ, 423, L93, 10.1086/187244 · DOI
- Lanusse, 2016, A&A, 591, A2, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628278 · DOI
- Laureijs R., Amiaux J., Arduini S., et al. 2011, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1110.3193] · arXiv
- Lecun Y., Chopra S., Hadsell R., Ranzato M., & Huang F.-J. 2006, A Tutorial on Energy-Based Learning (New York: MIT Press) · DOI
- Leonard, 2012, A&A, 539, A85, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117642 · DOI
- Lim J. H., Courville A., Pal C., & Huang C.-W. 2020, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:2006.05164] · arXiv
- Liu, 2015, Phys. Rev. D, 91, 063507, 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.063507 · DOI
- Liu, 2015, MNRAS, 450, 2888, 10.1093/mnras/stv784 · DOI
- Marinacci, 2018, MNRAS, 480, 5113
- Martinet, 2018, MNRAS, 474, 712, 10.1093/mnras/stx2793 · DOI
- Massey, 2007, ApJS, 172, 239, 10.1086/516599 · DOI
- Metropolis, 1953, J. Chem. Phys., 21, 1087, 10.1063/1.1699114 · DOI · Paper page
- Naiman, 2018, MNRAS, 477, 1206, 10.1093/mnras/sty618 · DOI
- Navarro, 1997, ApJ, 490, 493, 10.1086/304888 · DOI · Paper page
- Neal R. M. 2011, Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo, 113 · DOI · Paper page
- Nelson, 2018, MNRAS, 475, 624, 10.1093/mnras/stx3040 · DOI
- Nelson, 2019, Comput. Astrophys. Cosmol., 6, 2, 10.1186/s40668-019-0028-x · DOI
- Nichol A., & Dhariwal P. 2021, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:2102.09672] · arXiv
- Osato, 2021, MNRAS, 502, 5593, 10.1093/mnras/stab395 · DOI
- Peel, 2017, ApJ, 847, 23, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa850d · DOI
- Perez, 2007, Comput. Sci. Eng., 9, 21, 10.1109/MCSE.2007.53 · DOI
- Perraudin, 2019, Astron. Comput., 27, 130, 10.1016/j.ascom.2019.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
- Pillepich, 2018, MNRAS, 475, 648, 10.1093/mnras/stx3112 · DOI
- Planck Collaboration XIII, 2015, A&A, 594, A13, 10.1051/0004-6361/201525830 · DOI
- Porqueres, 2022, MNRAS, 509, 3194, 10.1093/mnras/stab3234 · DOI
- Price, 2018, MNRAS, 489, 3236, 10.1093/mnras/stz2373 · DOI
- Remy B., Lanusse F., Ramzi Z., et al. 2020, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:2011.08271] · arXiv
- Ribli, 2019, Nat. Astron., 3, 93, 10.1038/s41550-018-0596-8 · DOI
- Ronneberger O., Fischer P., & Brox T. 2015, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1505.04597] · arXiv
- Salimans T., Karpathy A., Chen X., & Kingma D. P. 2017, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1701.05517] · arXiv
- Schneider, 2016, ApJ, 839, 25, 10.3847/1538-4357/839/1/25 · DOI
- Schrabback, 2007, A&A, 468, 823, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065898 · DOI
- Schrabback, 2010, A&A, 516, A63, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913577 · DOI
- Scoville, 2007, ApJS, 172, 38, 10.1086/516580 · DOI
- Shan, 2018, MNRAS, 474, 1116, 10.1093/mnras/stx2837 · DOI
- Shi, 2021, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2021, 030, 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/03/030 · DOI
- Shirasaki, 2021, MNRAS, 504, 1825, 10.1093/mnras/stab982 · DOI · Paper page
- Simon, 2012, MNRAS, 419, 998, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19760.x · DOI
- Smith, 2022, MNRAS, 511, 1808, 10.1093/mnras/stac130 · DOI
- Song Y., & Ermon S. 2019, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1907.05600] · arXiv
- Song Y., & Ermon S. 2020, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:2006.09011] · arXiv
- Song Y., Garg S., Shi J., & Ermon S. 2019, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1905.07088] · arXiv
- Spergel D., Gehrels N., Baltay C., et al. 2015, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1503.03757] · arXiv
- Springel, 2018, MNRAS, 475, 676, 10.1093/mnras/stx3304 · DOI
- Starck J.-L., Murtagh F., & Bijaoui A. 1998, Image Processing and Data Analysis: The Multiscale Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) · DOI
- Starck, 2006, A&A, 451, 1139, 10.1051/0004-6361:20052997 · DOI
- Starck, 2021, A&A, 649, A99, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039451 · DOI
- Takada, 2003, ApJ, 583, L49, 10.1086/368066 · DOI
- van den Oord A., Kalchbrenner N., & Kavukcuoglu K. 2016, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1601.06759] · arXiv
- Villaescusa-Navarro, 2022, ApJS, 259, 61, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac5ab0 · DOI
- Yiu, 2022, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 12, 013, 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/12/013 · DOI
- Zaroubi, 1995, ApJ, 449, 446, 10.1086/176070 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Principled Probabilistic Imaging using Diffusion Models as Plug-and-Play Priors
Wu, Z., Sun, Y., Chen, Y., Zhang, B.-L., Yue, Y.-S., & Bouman, K. (2024) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.18782 · Cited by 138
The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys
Huertas-Company, M., & Lanusse, F. (2023) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2022.55 · Cited by 102
“To overcome these limitations, Remy et al. (2022) introduced an approach allowing to sample from the full posterior distribution of the mass-mapping problem.”
BackgroundSelf-citationAstronomia ex machina: a history, primer and outlook on neural networks in astronomy
Smith, M. J., & Geach, J. E. (2023) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.221454 · Cited by 90
“At the time of writing there are only three examples of score-based (or diffusion) modelling in the astronomy literature [184,217,218].”
BackgroundPosterior samples of source galaxies in strong gravitational lenses with score-based priors
Adam, A., Coogan, A., Whitammer, E. S., Legin, R., Perreault-Levasseur, L., Hezaveh, Y., & Bengio, Y. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.03812 · Cited by 35
“[20] to produce samples from the posterior of convergence maps from weak lensing data.”
BackgroundBeyond Gaussian Noise: A Generalized Approach to Likelihood Analysis with Non-Gaussian Noise
Legin, R., Adam, A., Hezaveh, Y., & Perreault-Levasseur, L. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acd645 · Cited by 25
Machine Learning and CosmologyPreprint
Dvorkin, C., Mishra-Sharma, S., Nord, B., Villar, V. A., Avestruz, C., Bechtol, K., Ćiprijanović, A., Connolly, A. J., Garrison, L. H., Narayan, G., et al. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.08056 · Cited by 52
“Additionally, machine learning methods have demonstrated the ability to outperform traditional estimators in mass mapping—reconstructing the weak lensing convergence maps from observed galaxy ellipticities [37–40].”
BackgroundCan denoising diffusion probabilistic models generate realistic astrophysical fields?Preprint
Mudur, N., & Finkbeiner, D. P. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.12444 · Cited by 23
Barco, G. M., Adam, A., Stone, C., Hezaveh, Y., & Perreault-Levasseur, L. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9b92 · Cited by 17
“…Feng et al. 2023; Dia et al. 2023; Drozdova et al. 2024; Feng et al. 2024), deconvolution (e.g. Xue et al. 2023; Adam et al. 2023), mass modelling (Remy et al. 2023), cosmological fields or cosmological parameters recovery (Mudur & Finkbeiner 2022; Heurtel-Depeiges et al. 2023; Fl¨oss et al.…”
Lemos, P., Sharief, S., Whitammer, E. S., Salhi, S., Stone, C., Levasseur, L. P., & Hezaveh, Y. (2024) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.04355 · Cited by 13
“…2023; Kawar et al., 2022; Dou & Song, 2024; Chung et al., 2023; Feng et al., 2023; Dia et al., 2023; Drozdova et al., 2024; Xue et al., 2023; Remy et al., 2023; Flöss et al., 2024; Feng et al., 2024), noise models for explicit likelihood inference ( e.g. , Legin et al., 2023; Adam et al.,…”
Caustics: A Python Package for Accelerated Strong Gravitational Lensing Simulations
Stone, C., Adam, A., Coogan, A., Yantovski-Barth, M. J., Filipp, A., Setiawan, L., Core, C., Legin, R., Wilson, C., Barco, G. M., et al. (2024) · Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.07081 · Cited by 10
Barthelemy, A., Halder, A., Gong, Z.-J., & Uhlemann, C. (2024) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/03/060 · Cited by 10
“…shear and convergence has also permitted to build Bayesian reconstruction schemes of the convergence based on an observed shear field with the help of informed priors [see for example 34–36] as well as machine learning reconstruction algorithms [37] and more recently clever mix of the two [38].”
Legin, R., Isi, M., Wong, K. W. K., Hezaveh, Y., & Perreault-Levasseur, L. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/add681 · Cited by 8
“Following Remy et al. (2023), the relative probability between two points x ∗ and x n drawn from a distribution p ( x ) can be obtained from the score by solving the line integral We compute the integral in Eq.”
Diffusion-based mass map reconstruction from weak lensing data
Boruah, S. S., Jacob, M., & Jain, B. (2025) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.083542 · Cited by 8
Mancini, A. S., Lin, K., & McEwen, J. D. (2024) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.10616 · Cited by 8
“…transformation [74], informative priors for example to regularize inverse problems [ e.g. 75], data-driven priors potentially specified by a generative model [ e.g. 42, 76, 77], or data-informed priors, where the posterior of an a priori analysis is used as the prior for an analysis with new data…”
MethodDiffusion-HMC: Parameter Inference with Diffusion-model-driven Hamiltonian Monte Carlo
Mudur, N., Cuesta-Lázaro, C., & Finkbeiner, D. (2024) · Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8bc3 · Cited by 8
Diffusion Models for Probabilistic Deconvolution of Galaxy ImagesPreprint
Xue, Z.-W., Li, Y.-H., Patel, Y., & Regier, J. C. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.11122 · Cited by 7
“Diffusion models have been successfully applied to solve inverse problems (Kawar et al., 2022; Remy et al., 2023; Adam et al., 2022; Song et al., 2022).”
MethodBarthelemy, A., Halder, A., Gong, Z.-J., & Uhlemann, C. (2023) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.09468 · Cited by 7
“…shear and convergence has also permitted to build Bayesian reconstruction schemes of the convergence based on an observed shear field with the help of informed priors [see for example 34–36] as well as machine learning reconstruction algorithms [37] and more recently clever mix of the two [38].”
BackgroundAdam, A., Stone, C., Bottrell, C., Legin, R., Hezaveh, Y., & Perreault-Levasseur, L. (2025) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/adb039 · Cited by 6
“First, a prior encapsulating the space of all possible galaxy morphologies must be defined; diffusion models are well known to effectively represent such complex priors [19–21].”
BackgroundGenerative Models and Statistical ValidationPreprint
Diefenbacher, S., Schweitzer, S. P., & Kasieczka, G. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.30453 · Cited by 3
“…such as the reconstruction of source galaxies from gravitational lensing observations [ 106 ] , dark matter mass mapping from weak lensing data [ 107 ] , gravitational lensing potential from distorted Cosmic Microwave Background observations [ 108 ] , and the separation of astrophysical sources…”
Bayesian Imaging for Radio Interferometry with Score-Based Priors
Dia, N., Yantovski-Barth, M. J., Adam, A., Bowles, M., Lemos, P., Scaife, A., Hezaveh, Y., & Perreault-Levasseur, L. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.18012 · Cited by 4
“However, since the likelihoods considered in this work are very informative, we can employ the convolved likelihood approximation [31, 32], which allows us to write where A ≡ S F P beam , Σ jk = δ jk + δ j 0 δ k 0 , where δ jk denotes the Kronecker delta, and Γ ∈ 2 m × 2 m is the covariance matrix…”
MethodDe-noising non-Gaussian fields in cosmology with normalizing flowsPreprint
Rouhiainen, A., & Münchmeyer, M. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.15161 · Cited by 4
“The closest existing works which we are aware of are [6] and [7], which also aim to improve the posterior of a noisy observation of a Gaussian field, by using a learned prior.”
BackgroundAoyama, S. D., Osato, K., & Shirasaki, M. (2025) · doi:10.1093/pasj/psag052 · Cited by 3
“In addition, DM has also been applied in mass reconstruction (B. Remy et al. 2023; S. S. Boruah et al. 2025).”
Self-citationPoint cloud approach to generative modeling for galaxy surveys at the field level
Cuesta-Lázaro, C., & Mishra-Sharma, S. (2024) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.123531 · Cited by 3
Parzer, F., Jethwa, P., Boecker, A., Alfaro-Cuello, M., Scherzer, O., & van de Ven, G. (2022) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244739 · Cited by 3
MIRA: A Score for Conditional Distribution Accuracy and Model Comparison
Sharief, S., Zeghal, J., Barco, G. M., Lemos, P., Hezaveh, Y., & Perreault-Levasseur, L. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.02014 · Cited by 2
“…in high-energy particle physics experiments, e.g., Bellagente et al., 2020; Diefenbacher et al., 2024; Pazos et al., 2025, or in astrophysics, e.g., Remy et al., 2023; Adam et al., 2022; Feng et al., 2023; Legin et al., 2024) or geosciences (e.g Andry et al., 2025; Savary et al., 2025; Rozet &…”
Mapping Dark-Matter Clusters via Physics-Guided Diffusion Models
Royo, D., Zhao, B., Muñoz, A., Gutierrez, D., & Bouman, K. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.14503 · Cited by 1
“The seminal work of Kaiser and Squires [24] introduced a direct inversion method, which has since been improved via sparsity-based regularization [30,31], inverse-variance filtering [47], or supervised deep learning [22,43] to better handle the severe noise.”
Fast generation of weak lensing maps with analytical point transformation functions
Zhong, K., Bernstein, G., Boruah, S. S., Jain, B., & Kobla, S. (2024) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.103507 · Cited by 1
Shear Mapping in Python (SMPy): Modular, Extensible, and Accessible Dark Matter Mapping
Vassilakis, G., McCleary, J., Amit, M., & Saha, S. (2026) · Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.10928
“The weak lensing community is served by publicly available mapping tools like lenspack (Peel, 2020) and jax-lensing (Remy et al., 2023), each with their own strengths. jax-lensing excels at neural-network-based approaches and deep learning methods, but applying it to survey-specific data products…”
Graph Residual Conjugate Diffusion: SNR-Equalized Heat Flow for Graph Signals
Li, J.-W., & Tenbrinck, D. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.39658
“Related decompositions are known: Remy et al. (2023) combine an analytic Gaussian score with a learned residual trained by residual denoising score matching, while Wang & Vastola (2024) show that learned diffusion scores are well approximated by a Gaussian linear score at moderate to high noise…”
Generative Diffusion Priors for 3D Mapping of the Dark Universe
Zhao, B., Scognamiglio, D., Doré, O., & Bouman, K. L. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.00803
“More recent developments include deep-learning-based reconstructions employing U-Net convolutional architectures [19] and diffusion models [5, 6, 37], which learn nonlinear priors directly from simulated data.”
Increasing the Precision of Surrogate Models for Weak Lensing Mass Maps with Flow Matching
Li, G.-J., & Kacprzak, T. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.23114
“Diffusion and score-based methods have also been applied to weak-lensing mass map denoising and reconstruction [18–20].”
Aldridge, H., Liaudat, T., Pereyra, M., & McEwen, J. D. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.18655
“Existing UQ approaches are often tied to specific sets of cosmological parameters by the training of data-driven prior models on simulated data [17, 18] or by performing conformal prediction with a set of simulated calibration data [10, 11].”
Efficient prior sensitivity analysis for Bayesian model comparison
Hu, Z., & McEwen, J. D. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.15132
“Data-driven specifications include those potentially specified by a generative model (e.g. [23, 24, 25, 26]), and data-informed priors, where the posterior of an a priori analysis is used as the prior for an analysis with new data (e.g. [27]).”
SBGM: Score-Based Generative Models in JAX.
Homer, J. (2025) · The Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.08347
Denoising weak lensing mass maps with diffusion model and generative adversarial network
Aoyama, S. D., Osato, K., & Shirasaki, M. (2025) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.16415
“In addition to GAN, several previous works employed DM [Remy et al., 2023, Boruah et al., 2025] for denoising mass maps motivated by the fact that DM outperforms GAN in various tasks.”
Self-citationGatti, M., Anbajagane, D., Chang, C., Bacon, D., Prat, J., Adamów, M., Alarcon, A., Becker, M., Carballo-Bello, J., Chicoine, N., et al. (2025) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.03798
“This is commonly formulated as a Bayesian inference problem [42, 53]: where p ( κ ) is a prior on the convergence field, and p ( γ obs | κ ) is the likelihood.”
Self-citationPerspectives on the Past, Present, and Future of Astronomical Image Deconvolution
Starck, J.-L. (2025) · Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union · doi:10.1017/s1743921325104390
“…Wiener filtering using architectures such as DeepMass Jeffrey et al. (2020).. Probabilistic extensions have enabled uncertainty quantification using Bayesian sampling techniques Remy et al. (2023) or conformalized regression to estimate credible intervals on recovered structures Leterme et al. (2025).”
Self-citationComparing Mass Mapping Reconstruction Methods with Minkowski Functionals
Grewal, N., Zuntz, J., & Tröster, T. (2024) · The Open Journal of Astrophysics · doi:10.33232/001c.120394
“This also leads to leakage of the E and B modes of the reconstructed convergence field (Remy et al. 2022).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Remy, B., Lanusse, F., Jeffrey, N., Liu, J., Starck, J.-L., Osato, K., & Schrabback, T.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
- University of Bonn (DE)
- Venue
- Astronomy & Astrophysics
- Publisher
- EDP Sciences
- Published
- 2023-03-27
- Volume
- 672
- Pages
- A51
- ISSN
- 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0746
- OpenAlex
- W4221159242
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 93
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8
- FWCI
- 3.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Greater South Information System
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1053575)
- New Mexico State University
- Université Paris-Saclay
- Grand Équipement National De Calcul Intensif
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21J00011, 23K13095)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Keywords
- weak gravitational lensing, Bayesian posterior sampling, non-Gaussian priors, deep generative models, convergence maps, uncertainty quantification, Wiener filter, sparsity prior, COSMOS field, two-point statistics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review