Cited by 41Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Probabilistic mass-mapping with neural score estimation

Open access

Abstract

Context.Weak lensing mass-mapping is a useful tool for accessing the full distribution of dark matter on the sky, but because of intrinsic galaxy ellipticies, finite fields, and missing data, the recovery of dark matter maps constitutes a challenging, ill-posed inverse problem Aims.We introduce a novel methodology that enables the efficient sampling of the high-dimensional Bayesian posterior of the weak lensing mass-mapping problem, relying on simulations to define a fully non-Gaussian prior. We aim to demonstrate the accuracy of the method to simulated fields, and then proceed to apply it to the mass reconstruction of the HST/ACS COSMOS field. Methods.The proposed methodology combines elements of Bayesian statistics, analytic theory, and a recent class of deep generative models based on neural score matching. This approach allows us to make full use of analytic cosmological theory to constrain the 2pt statistics of the solution, to understand any differences between this analytic prior and full simulations from cosmological simulations, and to obtain samples from the full Bayesian posterior of the problem for robust uncertainty quantification. Results.We demonstrate the method in the κ TNG simulations and find that the posterior mean significantly outperfoms previous methods (Kaiser–Squires, Wiener filter, Sparsity priors) both for the root-mean-square error and in terms of the Pearson correlation. We further illustrate the interpretability of the recovered posterior by establishing a close correlation between posterior convergence values and the S/N of the clusters artificially introduced into a field. Finally, we apply the method to the reconstruction of the HST/ACS COSMOS field, which yields the highest-quality convergence map of this field to date. Conclusions.We find the proposed approach to be superior to previous algorithms, scalable, providing uncertainties, and using a fully non-Gaussian prior.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/0004-6361/202243054

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 93

  1. Ajani, 2021, A&A, 645, L11, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039988 · DOI
  2. Alain G., & Bengio Y. 2013, in 1st International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2013 - Conference Track Proceedings, 15, 3743
  3. Alsing, 2016, MNRAS, 455, 4452, 10.1093/mnras/stv2501 · DOI
  4. Anderson, 1982, Stochast. Process. Appl., 12, 313, 10.1016/0304-4149(82)90051-5 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Robitaille, 2013, A&A, 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Price-Whelan, 2018, AJ, 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aac387 · DOI
  7. Bartelmann, 2010, Class. Quant. Grav., 27, 233001, 10.1088/0264-9381/27/23/233001 · DOI
  8. Betancourt M. 2017, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1701.02434] · arXiv
  9. Bobin, 2012, Adv. Astron., 2012, 703217, 10.1155/2012/703217 · DOI
  10. Cheng, 2020, MNRAS, 499, 5902, 10.1093/mnras/staa3165 · DOI
  11. Clowe, 2012, ApJ, 758, 128, 10.1088/0004-637X/758/2/128 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Dillon J. V., Langmore I., Tran D., et al. 2017, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1711.10604] · arXiv
  13. Elsner, 2013, A&A, 549, A111, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220586 · DOI
  14. Erben, 2001, A&A, 366, 717, 10.1051/0004-6361:20010013 · DOI
  15. Fiedorowicz, 2022, MNRAS, 512, 73, 10.1093/mnras/stac468 · DOI
  16. Finoguenov, 2007, ApJS, 172, 182, 10.1086/516577 · DOI
  17. Girolami, 2011, J. R. Statist. Soc.: Ser. B (Statist. Methodol.), 73, 123, 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00765.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. Goodfellow I. J., Pouget-Abadie J., Mirza M., et al. 2014, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1406.2661] · arXiv
  19. Gouk, 2020, Mach. Learn., 110, 393, 10.1007/s10994-020-05929-w · DOI
  20. Harnois-Déraps, 2021, MNRAS, 506, 1623, 10.1093/mnras/stab1623 · DOI
  21. Harris, 2020, Nature, 585, 357, 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Hastings, 1970, Biometrika, 57, 97, 10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 · DOI · Paper page
  23. He K., Zhang X., Ren S., & Sun J. 2016, Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 770
  24. Ho, 2020, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 33, 6840
  25. Hoekstra, 1998, ApJ, 504, 636, 10.1086/306102 · DOI
  26. Horowitz, 2019, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 10, 035, 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/10/035 · DOI
  27. Hunter, 2007, Comput. Sci. Eng., 9, 90, 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Ilbert, 2009, ApJ, 690, 1236, 10.1088/0004-637X/690/2/1236 · DOI
  29. Jee, 2012, ApJ, 747, 96, 10.1088/0004-637X/747/2/96 · DOI
  30. Jeffrey, 2018, MNRAS, 479, 2871, 10.1093/mnras/sty1252 · DOI
  31. Jeffrey, 2018, Astron. Comput., 25, 230, 10.1016/j.ascom.2018.10.001 · DOI
  32. Jeffrey, 2020, MNRAS, 501, 954, 10.1093/mnras/staa3594 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Jeffrey, 2020, MNRAS, 492, 5023, 10.1093/mnras/staa127 · DOI
  34. Jimenez Rezende D., Mohamed S., & Wierstra D. 2014, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1401.4082] · arXiv
  35. Jolicoeur-Martineau A., Piché-Taillefer R., des Combes R. T., & Mitliagkas I. 2020, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:2009.05475] · arXiv
  36. Kacprzak, 2016, MNRAS, 463, 3653, 10.1093/mnras/stw2070 · DOI
  37. Kaiser, 1993, ApJ, 404, 441, 10.1086/172297 · DOI
  38. Kaiser, 1995, ApJ, 449, 460, 10.1086/176071 · DOI
  39. Kilbinger, 2015, Rep. Progr. Phys., 78, 086901, 10.1088/0034-4885/78/8/086901 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Kingma D. P., & Welling M. 2013, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1312.6114] · arXiv
  41. Kurita, 2021, MNRAS, 501, 833, 10.1093/mnras/staa3625 · DOI
  42. Lahav, 1994, ApJ, 423, L93, 10.1086/187244 · DOI
  43. Lanusse, 2016, A&A, 591, A2, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628278 · DOI
  44. Laureijs R., Amiaux J., Arduini S., et al. 2011, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1110.3193] · arXiv
  45. Lecun Y., Chopra S., Hadsell R., Ranzato M., & Huang F.-J. 2006, A Tutorial on Energy-Based Learning (New York: MIT Press) · DOI
  46. Leonard, 2012, A&A, 539, A85, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117642 · DOI
  47. Lim J. H., Courville A., Pal C., & Huang C.-W. 2020, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:2006.05164] · arXiv
  48. Liu, 2015, Phys. Rev. D, 91, 063507, 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.063507 · DOI
  49. Liu, 2015, MNRAS, 450, 2888, 10.1093/mnras/stv784 · DOI
  50. Marinacci, 2018, MNRAS, 480, 5113
  51. Martinet, 2018, MNRAS, 474, 712, 10.1093/mnras/stx2793 · DOI
  52. Massey, 2007, ApJS, 172, 239, 10.1086/516599 · DOI
  53. Metropolis, 1953, J. Chem. Phys., 21, 1087, 10.1063/1.1699114 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Naiman, 2018, MNRAS, 477, 1206, 10.1093/mnras/sty618 · DOI
  55. Navarro, 1997, ApJ, 490, 493, 10.1086/304888 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Neal R. M. 2011, Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo, 113 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Nelson, 2018, MNRAS, 475, 624, 10.1093/mnras/stx3040 · DOI
  58. Nelson, 2019, Comput. Astrophys. Cosmol., 6, 2, 10.1186/s40668-019-0028-x · DOI
  59. Nichol A., & Dhariwal P. 2021, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:2102.09672] · arXiv
  60. Osato, 2021, MNRAS, 502, 5593, 10.1093/mnras/stab395 · DOI
  61. Peel, 2017, ApJ, 847, 23, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa850d · DOI
  62. Perez, 2007, Comput. Sci. Eng., 9, 21, 10.1109/MCSE.2007.53 · DOI
  63. Perraudin, 2019, Astron. Comput., 27, 130, 10.1016/j.ascom.2019.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Pillepich, 2018, MNRAS, 475, 648, 10.1093/mnras/stx3112 · DOI
  65. Planck Collaboration XIII, 2015, A&A, 594, A13, 10.1051/0004-6361/201525830 · DOI
  66. Porqueres, 2022, MNRAS, 509, 3194, 10.1093/mnras/stab3234 · DOI
  67. Price, 2018, MNRAS, 489, 3236, 10.1093/mnras/stz2373 · DOI
  68. Remy B., Lanusse F., Ramzi Z., et al. 2020, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:2011.08271] · arXiv
  69. Ribli, 2019, Nat. Astron., 3, 93, 10.1038/s41550-018-0596-8 · DOI
  70. Ronneberger O., Fischer P., & Brox T. 2015, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1505.04597] · arXiv
  71. Salimans T., Karpathy A., Chen X., & Kingma D. P. 2017, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1701.05517] · arXiv
  72. Schneider, 2016, ApJ, 839, 25, 10.3847/1538-4357/839/1/25 · DOI
  73. Schrabback, 2007, A&A, 468, 823, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065898 · DOI
  74. Schrabback, 2010, A&A, 516, A63, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913577 · DOI
  75. Scoville, 2007, ApJS, 172, 38, 10.1086/516580 · DOI
  76. Shan, 2018, MNRAS, 474, 1116, 10.1093/mnras/stx2837 · DOI
  77. Shi, 2021, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2021, 030, 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/03/030 · DOI
  78. Shirasaki, 2021, MNRAS, 504, 1825, 10.1093/mnras/stab982 · DOI · Paper page
  79. Simon, 2012, MNRAS, 419, 998, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19760.x · DOI
  80. Smith, 2022, MNRAS, 511, 1808, 10.1093/mnras/stac130 · DOI
  81. Song Y., & Ermon S. 2019, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1907.05600] · arXiv
  82. Song Y., & Ermon S. 2020, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:2006.09011] · arXiv
  83. Song Y., Garg S., Shi J., & Ermon S. 2019, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1905.07088] · arXiv
  84. Spergel D., Gehrels N., Baltay C., et al. 2015, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1503.03757] · arXiv
  85. Springel, 2018, MNRAS, 475, 676, 10.1093/mnras/stx3304 · DOI
  86. Starck J.-L., Murtagh F., & Bijaoui A. 1998, Image Processing and Data Analysis: The Multiscale Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) · DOI
  87. Starck, 2006, A&A, 451, 1139, 10.1051/0004-6361:20052997 · DOI
  88. Starck, 2021, A&A, 649, A99, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039451 · DOI
  89. Takada, 2003, ApJ, 583, L49, 10.1086/368066 · DOI
  90. van den Oord A., Kalchbrenner N., & Kavukcuoglu K. 2016, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1601.06759] · arXiv
  91. Villaescusa-Navarro, 2022, ApJS, 259, 61, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac5ab0 · DOI
  92. Yiu, 2022, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 12, 013, 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/12/013 · DOI
  93. Zaroubi, 1995, ApJ, 449, 446, 10.1086/176070 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Remy, B., Lanusse, F., Jeffrey, N., Liu, J., Starck, J.-L., Osato, K., & Schrabback, T.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • University of Bonn (DE)
Venue
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2023-03-27
Volume
672
Pages
A51
ISSN
  • 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0746
OpenAlex
W4221159242
Cited by
41
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1053575)
  • New Mexico State University
  • Université Paris-Saclay
  • Grand Équipement National De Calcul Intensif
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21J00011, 23K13095)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Keywords
weak gravitational lensing, Bayesian posterior sampling, non-Gaussian priors, deep generative models, convergence maps, uncertainty quantification, Wiener filter, sparsity prior, COSMOS field, two-point statistics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review