Cited by 54Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations

TDCOSMO 2025: Cosmological constraints from strong lensing time delays

Open access
TDCOSMO Collaboration, Birrer, Simon, Buckley-Geer, Elizabeth J., Cappellari, Michele, Courbin, Frédéric, Dux, Frédéric, Fassnacht, Christopher D., Frieman, Joshua A. +25 more·2025·Astronomy & Astrophysics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

We present cosmological constraints from eight strongly lensed quasars (hereafter, the TDCOSMO-2025 sample). Building on previous work, our analysis incorporated new deflector stellar velocity dispersions measured from spectra obtained with the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Keck Telescopes, and the Very Large Telescope (VLT), utilizing improved methods. We used integrated JWST stellar kinematics for five lenses, VLT-MUSE for 2, and resolved kinematics from Keck and JWST for RX J1131−1231. We also considered two samples of non-time-delay lenses: 11 from the Sloan Lens ACS (SLACS) sample with Keck-KCWI resolved kinematics; and four from the Strong Lenses in the Legacy Survey (SL2S) sample. We improved our analysis of line-of-sight effects, the surface brightness profile of the lens galaxies, and orbital anisotropy, and corrected for projection effects in the dynamics. Our uncertainties are maximally conservative by accounting for the mass-sheet degeneracy in the deflectors’ mass density profiles. The analysis was blinded to prevent experimenter bias. Our primary result is based on the TDCOSMO-2025 sample, in combination with Ω m constraints from the Pantheon+ Type Ia supernovae (SN) dataset. In the flat Λ cold dark matter (CDM), we find H 0 = 71.6 +3.9 −3.3 km s −1 Mpc −1 . The SLACS and SL2S samples are in excellent agreement with the TDCOSMO-2025 sample, improving the precision on H 0 in flat ΛCDM to 4.6%. Using the Dark Energy Survey SN Year-5 dataset (DES-SN5YR) or DESI-DR2 baryonic acoustic oscillations (BAO) likelihoods instead of Pantheon+ yields very similar results. We also present constraints in the open ΛCDM, w CDM, w 0 w a CDM, and w ϕ CDM cosmologies. The TDCOSMO H 0 inference is robust and consistent across all presented cosmological models, and our cosmological constraints in them agree with those from the BAO and SN.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/0004-6361/202555801

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Abdalla, E., Abellán, G. F., Aboubrahim, A., et al. 2022, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 34, 49
  2. Bacon, R., Accardo, M., Adjali, L., et al. 2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7735, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III, ed. I. S. McLean, S. K. Ramsay, & H. Takami, 773508
  3. Birrer, S., Shajib, A., Gilman, D., et al. 2021, The Journal of Open Source Software, 6, 3283
  4. Cappellari, M. 2026, in Encyclopedia of Astrophysics, Volume 4, Vol. 4, 122152
  5. Chevallier, M. & Polarski, D. 2001, International Journal of Modern Physics D, 10, 213
  6. Courbin, F., Eigenbrod, A., Vuissoz, C., Meylan, G., & Magain, P. 2005, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 225, Gravitational Lensing Impact on Cosmology, ed. Y. Mellier & G. Meylan, 297-303
  7. DESI-Collaboration, Abdul-Karim, M., Aguilar, J., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.14738 · arXiv
  8. Huang, X.-Y., Birrer, S., Cappellari, M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.00235 · arXiv
  9. Knabel, S., Mozumdar, P., Shajib, A. J., et al. 2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.16034 · arXiv
  10. Koopmans, L. V. E. 2004, arXiv e-prints, astro
  11. Louis, T., La Posta, A., Atkins, Z., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.14452 · arXiv
  12. Millon, M., Tewes, M., Bonvin, V., Lengen, B., & Courbin, F. 2020c, The Journal of Open Source Software, 5, 2654
  13. Morrissey, P., Matuszewski, M., Martin, C., et al. 2012, in Society of PhotoOptical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 8446, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy IV, ed. I. S. McLean, S. K. Ramsay, & H. Takami, 844613
  14. Mozumdar, P., Knabel, S., Treu, T., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.13962 · arXiv
  15. Perrin, M. D., Sivaramakrishnan, A., Lajoie, C.-P., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9143, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2014: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, ed. J. M. Oschmann, Jr., M. Clampin, G. G. Fazio, & H. A. MacEwen, 91433X
  16. Shajib, A. J. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.13341 · arXiv
  17. Shajib, A. J., Nihal, N. S., Tan, C. Y., et al. 2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.22657 · arXiv
  18. Shajib, A. J., Smith, G. P., Birrer, S., et al. 2025b, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 383, 20240117
  19. Shajib, A. J., Treu, T., Melo, A., et al. 2025c, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.03746 · arXiv
  20. Shajib, A. J., Treu, T., Suyu, S. H., et al. 2025d, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.21665 · arXiv
  21. Williams, D. M., Treu, T., Birrer, S., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.00099 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
TDCOSMO Collaboration, Birrer, S., Buckley-Geer, E. J., Cappellari, M., Courbin, F., Dux, F., Fassnacht, C. D., Frieman, J. A., Galan, A., Gilman, D., Huang, X.-Y., Knabel, S., Langeroodi, D., Lin, H., Millon, M., Morishita, T., Motta, V., Mozumdar, P., Paic, E., Shajib, A. J., Sheu, W., Sluse, D., Sonnenfeld, A., Spiniello, C., Stiavelli, M., Suyu, S. H., Tan, C. Y., Treu, T., Van de Vyvere, L., Wang, H., Wells, P., Williams, D. M., & Wong, K. C.
Affiliations
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
  • European Southern Observatory (DE)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (US)
  • Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics (DE)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (US)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Valparaíso (CL)
  • Research Center for the Early Universe (JP)
  • Independent University, Bangladesh (BD)
  • University of Liège (BE)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • Space Telescope Science Institute (US)
  • STAR Institute, Liège Université, Quartier Agora – Allée du six Août
  • Argonne National Laboratory (US)
Venue
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2025-12
Volume
704
Pages
A63
ISSN
  • 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0746
OpenAlex
W4415259046
Cited by
54
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 8
FWCI
21.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection (cc-by)
Funders
  • Max Planck Society
  • Department of Physics \& Astronomy, Stony Brook University.
  • Swiss National Science Foundation (P500PT_211034, P500PT_203114, P5R5PT_225598)
  • HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council (787886)
  • National Science Foundation (AST-2407278, NSF-AST-1906976, NSF-AST-1836016)
  • Villum Fonden (VIL16599, VIL54489)
  • JSPS KAKENHI (JP24H00221, JP20K14511, JP24K07089)
  • ANID FONDECYT (1231418)
  • Millennium Science Initiative, (AIM23-0001)
  • Centro de Astrofisica de Valparaiso (CIDI N21)
  • NASA (HST-HF2-51492, JWST-GO-3990, HST-GO-16773, JWST-GO-2974, 80NSSC22K1294, HST-AR-16149)
  • Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS (4.4503.1)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EXC-2094, 390783311)
  • Moore Foundation (8548)
  • NSF (NSF-AST-2407277)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Keywords
strong gravitational lensing, time-delay cosmography, Hubble constant, strongly lensed quasars, stellar velocity dispersion, mass-sheet degeneracy, line-of-sight effects, orbital anisotropy, SLACS, modified gravity cosmology, dark energy cosmology, cosmological constraints

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review