Cited by 454Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations

DISSECTING THE GRAVITATIONAL LENS B1608+656. II. PRECISION MEASUREMENTS OF THE HUBBLE CONSTANT, SPATIAL CURVATURE, AND THE DARK ENERGY EQUATION OF STATE

Open access
Suyu, S. H., Marshall, P. J., Auger, M. W., Hilbert, S., Blandford, R. D., Koopmans, L. V. E., Fassnacht, C. D., Treu, T.·2010·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Strong gravitational lens systems with measured time delays between the multiple images provide a method for measuring the "time-delay distance" to the lens, and thus the Hubble constant. We present a Bayesian analysis of the strong gravitational lens system B1608+656, incorporating (1) new, deep Hubble Space Telescope ( HST ) observations, (2) a new velocity-dispersion measurement of 260 ± 15 km s −1 for the primary lens galaxy, and (3) an updated study of the lens' environment. Our analysis of the HST images takes into account the extended source surface brightness, and the dust extinction and optical emission by the interacting lens galaxies. When modeling the stellar dynamics of the primary lens galaxy, the lensing effect, and the environment of the lens, we explicitly include the total mass distribution profile logarithmic slope γ' and the external convergence κ ext ; we marginalize over these parameters, assigning well-motivated priors for them, and so turn the major systematic errors into statistical ones. The HST images provide one such prior, constraining the lens mass density profile logarithmic slope to be γ' = 2.08 ± 0.03; a combination of numerical simulations and photometric observations of the B1608+656 field provides an estimate of the prior for κ ext : 0.10 +0.08 −0.05 . This latter distribution dominates the final uncertainty on H 0 . Fixing the cosmological parameters at Ω m = 0.3, Ω Λ = 0.7, and w = −1 in order to compare with previous work on this system, we find H 0 = 70.6 +3.1 −3.1 km s −1 Mpc −1 . The new data provide an increase in precision of more than a factor of 2, even including the marginalization over κ ext . Relaxing the prior probability density function for the cosmological parameters to that derived from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) five-year data set, we find that the B1608+656 data set breaks the degeneracy between Ω m and Ω Λ at w = −1 and constrains the curvature parameter to be −0.031 < Ω k < 0.009 (95% CL), a level of precision comparable to that afforded by the current Type Ia SNe sample. Asserting a flat spatial geometry, we find that, in combination with WMAP , H 0 = 69.7 +4.9 −5.0 km s −1 Mpc −1 and w = −0.94 +0.17 −0.19 (68% CL), suggesting that the observations of B1608+656 constrain w as tightly as the current Baryon Acoustic Oscillation data do.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/711/1/201

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Time delays of galaxy-scale lensed quasars will allow measurement of Hubble's constant in hundreds of systems, with subpercent precision in H(z) achievable.

    “Time delays of galaxy-scale lensed quasars will allow one to measure Hubble ' s constant ( e.g., Suyu et al. 2010; Bonvin et al. 2017 ) in hundreds of systems; subpercentlevel precision in H ( z ) should be achievable ( Coe &amp; Moustakas 2009; Treu &amp; Marshall 2016 ) , providing a further independent dark energy probe.”

    From LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products (2019) · cites this paper as Suyu et al. 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Binney, J., & Tremaine, S. 1987, Galactic dynamics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press), 747
  2. Fadely, R., Keeton, C. R., Nakajima, R., & Bernstein, G. M. 2009, ApJ, in press (arXiv:0909.1807) · arXiv
  3. Fassnacht, C. D., Koopmans, L. V. E., & Wong, K. C. 2009, MNRAS, submitted (arXiv:0909.4301) · arXiv
  4. Hu, W. 2005, in ASP Conf. Ser. 339, Observing Dark Energy, ed. S. C. Wolff & T. R. Lauer (San Francisco, CA: ASP), 215
  5. Humphrey, P. J., & Buote, D. A. 2009, arXiv:0911.0678 · arXiv
  6. MacKay, D. 2003, in Information Theory, Inference and Learning Algorithms, (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press)
  7. McKean, J. P., et al. 2009, MNRAS, in press (arXiv:0910.1133) · arXiv
  8. Oguri, M., & Marshall, P. J. 2010, arXiv:1001.2037 · arXiv
  9. Schneider, P., Kochanek, C. S., & Wambsganss, J. 2006, Gravitational Lensing: Strong, Weak and Micro (Berlin: Springer)
  10. Sivia, D. S. 1996, in Data Analysis: A Bayesian Tutorial, (Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suyu, S. H., Marshall, P. J., Auger, M. W., Hilbert, S., Blandford, R. D., Koopmans, L. V. E., Fassnacht, C. D., & Treu, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (US)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Suyu, S. H.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2010-02-10
Volume
711
Issue
1
Pages
201-221
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2143112358
Cited by
454
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 23
FWCI
16.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0444059, 0642621, DE-AC02-76SF00515, CAREER, NAS 5-26555)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (76SF00515, DE–AC02–76SF00515, AC02‐76SF00515, NAS 5-26555, DE-AC02-)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NAS 526555, 526555)
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • Space Telescope Science Institute (NAS5- 26555, 5-26555, 26555)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DE-AC02-76SF00515, NAS 5-26555)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (10158)
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/H00243X/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Keywords
strong gravitational lensing, Hubble constant, time-delay distance, dark energy equation of state, spatial curvature, lens mass profile, external convergence, velocity dispersion, interstellar extinction, cosmological parameter constraints, Bayesian analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review