The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The evolution of faint AGN between z $\simeq$ 1 and z $\simeq$ 5 from the COMBO-17 survey
Open accessAbstract
We present a determination of the optical/UV AGN luminosity function and its evolution, based on a large sample of faint () QSOs identified in the COMBO-17 survey. Using multi-band photometry in 17 filters within , we could simultaneously determine photometric redshifts with an accuracy of and obtain spectral energy distributions. The redshift range covered by the sample is , which implies that even at , the sample reaches below luminosities corresponding to MB = -23, conventionally employed to distinguish between Seyfert galaxies and quasars. We clearly detect a broad plateau-like maximum of quasar activity around and map out the smooth turnover between and . The shape of the LF is characterised by some mild curvature, but no sharp “break” is present within the range of luminosities covered. Using only the COMBO-17 data, the evolving LF can be adequately described by either a pure density evolution (PDE) or a pure luminosity evolution (PLE) model. However, the absence of a strong L*-like feature in the shape of the LF inhibits a robust distinction between these modes. We present a robust estimate for the integrated UV luminosity generation by AGN as a function of redshift. We find that the LF continues to rise even at the lowest luminosities probed by our survey, but that the slope is sufficiently shallow that the contribution of low-luminosity AGN to the UV luminosity density is negligible. Although our sample reaches much fainter flux levels than previous data sets, our results on space densities and LF slopes are completely consistent with extrapolations from recent major surveys such as SDSS and 2QZ.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305772 · Cited by 15,126
Cited by
Hopkins, P. F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T. J., Di Matteo, T., Robertson, B., & Springel, V. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/499298 · Cited by 1,873
Mid‐Infrared Selection of Active Galaxies
Stern, D., Eisenhardt, P., Gorjian, V., Kochanek, C. S., Caldwell, N., Eisenstein, D., Brodwin, M., Brown, M. J. I., Cool, R., Dey, A., et al. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/432523 · Cited by 929
Observational Constraints on Cosmic Reionization
Fan, X., Carilli, C. L., & Keating, B. (2006) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092514 · Cited by 788
Active galactic nuclei: what’s in a name?
Padovani, P., Alexander, D. M., Assef, R. J., De Marco, B., Giommi, P., Hickox, R. C., Richards, G. T., Smolčić, V., Hatziminaoglou, E., Mainieri, V., et al. (2017) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-017-0102-9 · Cited by 666
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey View of the Palomar-Green Bright Quasar Survey
Jester, S., Schneider, D. P., Richards, G. T., Green, R. F., Schmidt, M., Hall, P. B., Strauss, M. A., Vanden Berk, D. E., Stoughton, C., Gunn, J. E., et al. (2005) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/432466 · Cited by 665
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolf, C., Wisotzki, L., Borch, A., Dye, S., Kleinheinrich, M., & Meisenheimer, K.
- Venue
- Astronomy & Astrophysics
- Publisher
- EDP Sciences
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 408
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 499-514
- ISSN
- 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0746
- OpenAlex
- W2093500576
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The evolution of faint AGN between z $\simeq$ 1 and z $\simeq$ 5 from the COMBO-17 survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1051/0004-6361:20030990
- The paper
- Wolf, C., Wisotzki, L., Borch, A., Dye, S., Kleinheinrich, M., & Meisenheimer, K. (2003). The evolution of faint AGN between z $\simeq$ 1 and z $\simeq$ 5 from the COMBO-17 survey. Astronomy & Astrophysics. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361%3A20030990
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.