Cited by 134Fungal Infections and StudiesAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityActinomycetales infections and treatment

Blastomycosis: organ involvement and etiologic diagnosis. A review of 123 patients from Mississippi.

Lemos, Luciano B., Guo, Ming, Baliga, Mithra·2000·Annals of Diagnostic Pathology

Abstract

Blastomycosis can only be diagnosed through the identification of the yeasts of Blastomyces dermatitidis in body fluids, tissues, or cultured material. The charts from 123 patients treated for blastomycosis at the University of Mississippi Medical Center from January 1980 through May 2000 were reviewed to determine the role of wet preparation, cytology, histology, and culture in diagnosing this fungal disease. Cytology uncovered the etiologic agent in 56.1% of all cases and in 71.8% of pulmonary cases. Cytology also was the first method to disclose the fungus in 57.7% of pulmonary cases. Sputum was the cytology specimen examined in 51% of the patients. In 69 patients with lung involvement, pulmonary cytology was positive in 97% of cases. Wet preparation was the second method to most commonly uncover the fungus in 37.4% of all cases. Histology was the third method with 32.5% of positive cases. Cultures were positive in 64.2% of all cases but they were the first to detect the fungus in only 3.2% of all patients. There was pulmonary involvement in 87% of patients, cutaneous involvement in 20%, osseous involvement in 15%, and central nervous involvement in 3%. In the medical literature the relative proportion of pulmonary versus disseminated disease clearly increased in series reported after 1959. Proportionally to the pattern of patients admitted to the University of Mississippi Medical Center, there is a clear predominance of black males among patients with blastomycosis followed by black females. White females constitute the sex/ethnic group least affected by this fungal disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/adpa.2000.20755

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a study of persons admitted to the University of Mississippi Medical Center and treated for blastomycosis from 1980 to 2000, there was a clear predominance of black or African American men, followed by black or African American women, among 123 hospitalized persons (81% black, 17% white, 2% Native American).

    “In another study of persons admitted to the University of Mississippi Medical Center and treated for blastomycosis from 1980 to 2000, there was a clear predominance of black or African American men admitted to the hospital, followed by black or African American women. Among the 123 hospitalized persons, 100 (81%) were black or African American, 21 (17%) white, and 2 (2%) Native American.”

    From Race and ethnicity: Risk factors for fungal infections? (2023) · cites this paper as [178]

  • The increased risk for hospitalization among racial and ethnic minorities may signify blastomycosis-related health disparities.

    “The increased risk for hospitalization among racial and ethnic minorities may signify blastomycosis-related health disparities [178–180].”

    From Race and ethnicity: Risk factors for fungal infections? (2023) · cites this paper as [178]

  • The increased risk for hospitalization among persons of nonwhite races lends further evidence to the existence of blastomycosis-related health disparities.

    “The increased risk for hospitalization among persons of nonwhite races lends further evidence to the existence of blastomycosis-related health disparities, as previously suspected (15–17).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lemos, L. B., Guo, M., & Baliga, M.
Affiliations
University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
Venue
Annals of Diagnostic Pathology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-12
Volume
4
Issue
6
Pages
391-406
ISSN
1092-9134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064638442
Cited by
134
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Diagnostic Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology › Actinomycetales infections and treatment
Keywords
blastomycosis, Blastomyces dermatitidis, etiological diagnosis, cytology, wet preparation, histology, fungal culture, pulmonary involvement, skin involvement, bone involvement, central nervous system involvement, disseminated disease, Mississippi
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Black or African American, Blastomyces, Blastomycosis, Bone Diseases, Infectious, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Lung Diseases, Fungal, Male, Middle Aged, Mississippi, Retrospective Studies, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Central Nervous System Fungal Infections, Black People, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review