The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke
Abstract
Objective To compare the effects of robot-assisted movement training with conventional techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke.Design Randomized controlled trial, 6-month follow-up.Setting A Department of Veterans Affairs rehabilitation research and development center.Participants Consecutive sample of 27 subjects with chronic hemiparesis (>6mo after cerebrovascular accident) randomly allocated to group.Interventions All subjects received twenty-four 1-hour sessions over 2 months. Subjects in the robot group practiced shoulder and elbow movements while assisted by a robot manipulator. Subjects in the control group received neurodevelopmental therapy (targeting proximal upper limb function) and 5 minutes of exposure to the robot in each session.Main outcome measures Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor impairment, FIMtrade mark instrument, and biomechanic measures of strength and reaching kinematics. Clinical evaluations were performed by a therapist blinded to group assignments.Results Compared with the control group, the robot group had larger improvements in the proximal movement portion of the Fugl-Meyer test after 1 month of treatment (P<.05) and also after 2 months of treatment (P<.05). The robot group had larger gains in strength (P<.02) and larger increases in reach extent (P<.01) after 2 months of treatment. At the 6-month follow-up, the groups no longer differed in terms of the Fugl-Meyer test (P>.30); however, the robot group had larger improvements in the FIM (P<.04).Conclusions Compared with conventional treatment, robot-assisted movements had advantages in terms of clinical and biomechanical measures. Further research into the use of robotic manipulation for motor rehabilitation is justified.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Guitton, H., & Siegel, S. (1958) · Revue économique · doi:10.2307/3498751 · Cited by 35,279
Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences.
Whitfield, J. W., & Siegel, S. (1957) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2342828 · Cited by 8,017
Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data
Booth, D. E., & Schafer, J. L. (2000) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1271466 · Cited by 5,627
The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance
Fugl-Meyer, A., Jääskö, L., Leyman, I., Olsson, S., & Steglind, S. (1975) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.2340/1650197771331 · Cited by 5,564
Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study
di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00230027 · Cited by 3,539
Nonparametric Statistics : for the Behavioral Sciences
Siegel, S. (1956) · UCLA - Biblioteca de Ciencias y Tecnologia Felix Morales Bueno · Cited by 3,314
Nudo, R. J., Wise, B. M., SiFuentes, F., & Milliken, G. W. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.272.5269.1791 · Cited by 1,911
The Barthel ADL Index: A standard measure of physical disability?
Wade, D. T., & Collin, C. (1988) · International Disability Studies · doi:10.3109/09638288809164105 · Cited by 1,587
Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke.
Taub, E., Miller, N. E., Novack, T. A., Cook, E. W., Fleming, W. C., Nepomuceno, C., Connell, J., & Crago, J. E. (1993) · PubMed · Cited by 1,557
Treatment-Induced Cortical Reorganization After Stroke in Humans
Liepert, J., Bauder, H., Miltner, W. H. R., Taub, E., & Weiller, C. (2000) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.31.6.1210 · Cited by 1,406
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Burgar, 1999, Rehabilitation of upper limb dysfunction in chronic hemiplegia: robot-assisted movements vs. conventional therapy [abstract], Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 80, 1121
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review
Langhorne, P., Coupar, F., & Pollock, A. (2009) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70150-4 · Cited by 2,343
Human–Robot Interaction: A Survey
Goodrich, M. A., & Schultz, A. C. (2008) · Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1561/1100000005 · Cited by 1,541
Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review
Kwakkel, G., Kollen, B. J., & Krebs, H. I. (2007) · Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · doi:10.1177/1545968307305457 · Cited by 1,503
“The robot enables the bilateral practice of a 3-DoF shoulder-elbow movement, whereby the nonparetic arm guides the paretic arm.(12) The InMotion(2) Shoulder-Elbow Robot, which is the commercial version of MIT-MANUS, has 2 DoF and provides shoulderelbow training in the horizontal plane with a supported forearm.”
BackgroundRobot-Assisted Therapy for Long-Term Upper-Limb Impairment after Stroke
Lo, A. C., Guarino, P. D., Richards, L. G., Haselkorn, J. K., Wittenberg, G. F., Federman, D. G., Ringer, R. J., Wagner, T. H., Krebs, H. I., Volpe, B. T., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0911341 · Cited by 1,397
“Sleep disorder 9 (18) 12 (24) 11 (39) Glaucoma or cataract 16 (33) 10 (20) 4 (14) Myocardial infarction 9 (18) 8 (16) 8 (29) Congestive heart failure 9 (18) 7 (14) 6 (21) Cancer 8 (16) 7 (14) 5 (18) Peripheral vascular disease 5 (10) 3 (6) 5 (18) Chronic pain syndrome 3 (6) 4 (8) 6 (21) Angina 2 (4) 3 (6) 3 (11) Chron…”
InfluentialMotor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation
Krakauer, J. W. (2006) · Current Opinion in Neurology · doi:10.1097/01.wco.0000200544.29915.cc · Cited by 1,282
A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation
Maciejasz, P., Eschweiler, J., Gerlach-Hahn, K., Jansen-Troy, A., & Leonhardt, S. K. (2014) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-11-3 · Cited by 1,253
“MIME, Burgar [120] 6 Shoulder * elbow Forearm position, orientation, torque DC brushed servomotors (PUMA 560 robot) Stationary system (end-effector-based); physical therapy CII studies: 27(13) cS [48] and 30(24) sS [49], CI study: 13 cS [50]; see also ARC-MIME”
BackgroundWhat Is the Evidence for Physical Therapy Poststroke? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Veerbeek, J. M., van Wegen, E., van Peppen, R., van der Wees, P. J., Hendriks, E., Rietberg, M., & Kwakkel, G. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087987 · Cited by 1,203
Human-Robot Interaction: A Survey
Goodrich, M. A., & Schultz, A. C. (2007) · now publishers, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1561/9781601980939 · Cited by 1,110
Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury
Marchal-Crespo, L., & Reinkensmeyer, D. J. (2009) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-6-20 · Cited by 1,182
Prange, G. B., Jannink, M. J. A., Groothuis‐Oudshoorn, C. G. M., Hermens, H. J., & IJzerman, M. J. (2006) · The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development · doi:10.1682/jrrd.2005.04.0076 · Cited by 917
Hatem, S. M., Saussez, G., della Faille, M., Prist, V., Zhang, X., Dispa, D., & Bleyenheuft, Y. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00442 · Cited by 918
“…experience pain of the upper extremity during the first year after stroke, especially shoulder pain and complex regional pain syndrome-type I (CRPS-type I), which may impede adequate early rehabilitation (Jönsson et al., 2006; Kocabas et al., 2007; Sackley et al., 2008; Lundström et al., 2009).”
Strategies for stroke rehabilitation
Dobkin, B. H. (2004) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(04)00851-8 · Cited by 732
Rehabilitation Robotics: Performance-Based Progressive Robot-Assisted Therapy
Krebs, H. I., Palazzolo, J. J., Dipietro, L., Ferraro, M., Krol, J., Rannekleiv, K., Volpe, B. T., & Hogan, N. (2003) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1023/a:1024494031121 · Cited by 714
Mehrholz, J., Pohl, M., Platz, T., Kügler, J., & Elsner, B. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006876.pub4 · Cited by 686
Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy for the Upper Limb After Stroke
Veerbeek, J. M., Langbroek-Amersfoort, A. C., van Wegen, E. E. H., Meskers, C. G. M., & Kwakkel, G. (2016) · Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · doi:10.1177/1545968316666957 · Cited by 674
Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke
Takahashi, C. D., Der-Yeghiaian, L., Le, V., Motiwala, R. R., & Cramer, S. C. (2007) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awm311 · Cited by 635
“…1999; Krebs et al., 2002; Lum et al., 2002; Fasoli et al., 2003; Ferraro et al., 2003; Kahn et al., 2006b), with few exceptions (Jack et al., 2001; Hesse et al., 2003b), these efforts have been primarily focused on the proximal arm (Krebs et al., 1999; Reinkensmeyer et al., 2000; Lum et al., 2002).”
BackgroundNational Clinical Guidelines for Stroke.
Robinson, T. G. (2001) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/pmj.77.906.286h · Cited by 608
Exoskeleton robots for upper-limb rehabilitation: State of the art and future prospects
Lo, H. S., & Xie, S. Q. (2012) · Medical Engineering & Physics · doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.10.004 · Cited by 571
Klamroth-Marganska, V., Blanco, J., Campen, K., Curt, A. E. P., Dietz, V., Ettlin, T. M., Felder, M., Fellinghauer, B. A. G., Guidali, M., Kollmar, A., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70305-3 · Cited by 529
Optimizing Compliant, Model-Based Robotic Assistance to Promote Neurorehabilitation
Wolbrecht, E. T., Chan, V., Reinkensmeyer, D. J., & Bobrow, J. E. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2008.918389 · Cited by 509
Robot-assisted Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation
Chang, W. H., & Kim, Y. (2013) · Journal of Stroke · doi:10.5853/jos.2013.15.3.174 · Cited by 527
“End-effector-type robotic devices Fourteen randomized controlled trials comparing robot-assisted therapy that use end-effector-type devices with conventional therapies for improvement of upper limb motor function after stroke were selected for review (Table 2).(29-41) The metaanalysis in a 2012 Cochrane review demonst…”
MethodResultTimmermans, A. A., Seelen, H. A., Willmann, R. D., & Kingma, H. (2009) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-6-1 · Cited by 483
Patton, J. L., Stoykov, M. E., Kovic, M., & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. (2006) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-005-0097-8 · Cited by 469
“An industrial robot (Puma 560) was also used to apply forces to the paretic limbs of stroke survivors through a customized forearm attachment (Burgar et al. 2000; Lum et al. 2002).”
MethodLum, P. S., Burgar, C. G., der Loos, H. F. M. V., Shor, P. C., Majmundar, M., & Yap, R. (2006) · The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development · doi:10.1682/jrrd.2005.02.0044 · Cited by 460
“Our initial clinical testing goal was to compare a therapy program of robotic manipulation with an equally intensive program of conventional therapy techniques [23].”
MethodARMin: a robot for patient-cooperative arm therapy
Nef, T., Mihelj, M., & Riener, R. (2007) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-007-0226-6 · Cited by 446
“There is further evidence that machine-delivered therapies can enhance the treatment [1, 5, 20, 21, 32].”
BackgroundMotor rehabilitation and brain plasticity after hemiparetic stroke
Schaechter, J. D. (2004) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2004.04.001 · Cited by 444
“…1999), bilateral training (Mudie and Matyas, 1996; Altschuler et al., 1999; Whitall et al., 2000; Hesse et al., 2003), robot-assisted training (Aisen et al., 1997; Volpe et al., 2000; Lum et al., 2002; Fasoli et al., 2003), and virtual reality training (Holden et al., 1999; Merians et al., 2002).”
BackgroundStrengthening interventions increase strength and improve activity after stroke: a systematic review
Ada, L., Dorsch, S., & Canning, C. G. (2006) · Australian Journal of Physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/s0004-9514(06)70003-4 · Cited by 442
Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective
Huang, V. S., & Krakauer, J. W. (2009) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-6-5 · Cited by 441
Robotics, Motor Learning, and Neurologic Recovery
Reinkensmeyer, D. J., Emken, J. L., & Cramer, S. C. (2004) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.6.040803.140223 · Cited by 415
Basteris, A., Nijenhuis, S. M., Stienen, A. H. A., Buurke, J. H., Prange, G. B., & Amirabdollahian, F. (2014) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-11-111 · Cited by 419
“Chronic 4 [70-72] 37 24.”
Robotic-Assisted Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb After Acute Stroke
Masiero, S., Celia, A., Rosati, G., & Armani, M. (2007) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.032 · Cited by 410
Robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper extremities
Riener, R., Nef, T., & Colombo, G. (2005) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/bf02345116 · Cited by 406
Mehrholz, J., Pohl, M., Platz, T., Kügler, J., & Elsner, B. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006876.pub5 · Cited by 450
Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients
Colombo, R., Pisano, F., Micera, S., Mazzone, A., Delconte, C., Carrozza, M. C., Dario, P., & Minuco, G. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2005.848352 · Cited by 405
“In particular, the MIT-Manus [13], [15], [17], [19], [20] and the mirror-image motion enabler (MIME) robots [16], [18], which were developed for unrestricted unilateral or bilateral shoulder and elbow movement, show that the recovery can be improved through additional therapy aided by robot technology.”
BackgroundBertani, R., Melegari, C., Cola, M. C. D., Bramanti, A., Bramanti, P., & Calabrò, R. S. (2017) · Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s10072-017-2995-5 · Cited by 417
“Lum, 2002 [30] Chronic 8 24 60 min 6 MIME”
Design strategies to improve patient motivation during robot-aided rehabilitation
Colombo, R., Pisano, F., Mazzone, A., Delconte, C., Micera, S., Carrozza, M. C., Dario, P., & Minuco, G. (2007) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-4-3 · Cited by 387
Motions or muscles? Some behavioral factors underlying robotic assistance of motor recovery
Hogan, N., Krebs, H. I., Rohrer, B., Palazzolo, J. J., Dipietro, L., Fasoli, S. E., Stein, J. M., Hughs, R., Frontera, W. R., Lynch, D., et al. (2006) · The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development · doi:10.1682/jrrd.2005.06.0103 · Cited by 377
“Given that interactive robotic therapy produced a significant effect on motor outcome [11–16], the conclusion seems inescapable: recovery requires active participation.”
BackgroundKahn, L. E., Zygman, M. L., Rymer, W. Z., & Reinkensmeyer, D. J. (2006) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-3-12 · Cited by 375
Norouzi-Gheidari, N., Archambault, P. S., & Fung, J. (2012) · The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development · doi:10.1682/jrrd.2010.10.0210 · Cited by 381
“• MIME, or “Mirror Image Movement Enabler,” is a robotic device with six degrees of freedom [32].”
BackgroundUpper and lower extremity robotic devices for rehabilitation and for studying motor control
Hesse, S., Schmidt, H., Werner, C., & Bardeleben, A. (2003) · Current Opinion in Neurology · doi:10.1097/00019052-200312000-00010 · Cited by 369
Housman, S. J., Scott, K. M., & Reinkensmeyer, D. J. (2009) · Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · doi:10.1177/1545968308331148 · Cited by 370
Stefanov, D., Bien, Z., & Bang, W.-C. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2004.828423 · Cited by 358
“The related systems are the robotic device for stroke rehabilitation in the GENTLE/S Project [93], the robotic therapy system, called Stanford Driver’s SEAT [94], the MIME project [95] of the VA Palo Alto Rehabilitation R&D Center, the robotic system for neuro-rehabilitation of the Newman Laboratory at the Massachuset…”
MethodSanchez, R. J., Liu, J., Rao, S. M., Shah, P., Smith, R. A., Rahman, T., Cramer, S. C., Bobrow, J. E., & Reinkensmeyer, D. J. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2006.881553 · Cited by 356
Rehabilitation of arm function after stroke. Literature review.
Oujamaa, L., Relave, I., Froger, J., Mottet, D., & Pelissier, J. (2009) · Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.rehab.2008.10.003 · Cited by 361
Recent developments in biofeedback for neuromotor rehabilitation
Huang, H., Wolf, S. L., & He, J. (2006) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-3-11 · Cited by 333
Mirelman, A., Bonato, P., & Deutsch, J. E. (2008) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.108.516328 · Cited by 335
Computerized Arm Training Improves the Motor Control of the Severely Affected Arm After Stroke
Hesse, S., Werner, C., Pohl, M., Rückriem, S., Mehrholz, J., & Lingnau, M.-L. (2005) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000177865.37334.ce · Cited by 329
A Standardized Approach to the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and Its Implications for Clinical Trials
See, J., Dodakian, L., Chou, C., Chan, V., McKenzie, A. L., Reinkensmeyer, D. J., & Cramer, S. C. (2013) · Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · doi:10.1177/1545968313491000 · Cited by 308
Poststroke Upper Extremity Rehabilitation: A Review of Robotic Systems and Clinical Results
Brewer, B. R., McDowell, S. K., & Worthen‐Chaudhari, L. (2007) · Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation · doi:10.1310/tsr1406-22 · Cited by 302
“The MIME system described previously also has a passive mode that moves the subject’s arm along a specific, desired trajectory.(24,25,34) The REHAROB system uses industrial robots to passively move the upper limb with the goal of decreasing spasticity.”
MethodWeb-based telerehabilitation for the upper extremity after stroke
Reinkensmeyer, D. J., Pang, C. T., Nessler, J. A., & Painter, C. C. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2002.1031978 · Cited by 291
Hornby, T. G., Zemon, D. H., & Campbell, D. D. (2005) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/85.1.52 · Cited by 284
Lum, P. S., Burgar, C. G., & Shor, P. C. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2004.827225 · Cited by 282
“Previously, we reported the results of a clinical trial of the mirror-image movement enabler (MIME) robotic device in chronic stroke subjects [5], [6].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWagner, J. M., Rhodes, J. A., & Patten, C. (2008) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20070255 · Cited by 278
Development and pilot testing of HEXORR: Hand EXOskeleton Rehabilitation Robot
Schabowsky, C. N., Godfrey, S. B., Holley, R. J., & Lum, P. S. (2010) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-7-36 · Cited by 280
ALTENMÜLLER, E. O., Marco‐Pallarés, J., Münte, T. F., & Schneider, S. (2009) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04580.x · Cited by 278
The Effectiveness of the Bobath Concept in Stroke Rehabilitation: What is the Evidence?
Kollen, B. J., Lennon, S., Lyons, B., Wheatley-Smith, L., Scheper, M., Buurke, J. H., Halfens, J., Geurts, A. C. H., & Kwakkel, G. (2009) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.108.533828 · Cited by 274
“43 However, only the study of Lum et al 44 showed superiority for robotic therapy.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialRobot-assisted movement training for the stroke-impaired arm: Does it matter what the robot does?
Kahn, L. E., Lum, P. S., Rymer, W. Z., & Reinkensmeyer, D. J. (2006) · The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development · doi:10.1682/jrrd.2005.03.0056 · Cited by 275
“The benefits of robot-assisted therapy are comparable with or better than that of conventional therapy [11–12].”
MethodMehrholz, J., Hädrich, A., Platz, T., Kügler, J., & Pohl, M. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006876.pub3 · Cited by 285
Assessment of movement quality in robot- assisted upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a review
Nordin, N., Xie, S. Q., & Wünsche, B. C. (2014) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-11-137 · Cited by 270
“[88,89] report a significant improvement in the extent of reach to shoulder-level target in comparison to healthy control subjects.”
BackgroundConnelly, L., Jia, Y., Toro, M. L., Stoykov, M. E., Kenyon, R. V., & Kamper, D. G. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2010.2047588 · Cited by 271
Design, Implementation and Clinical Tests of a Wire-Based Robot for Neurorehabilitation
Rosati, G., Gallina, P., & Masiero, S. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2007.908560 · Cited by 267
“The integration of robotic therapy into current practice may increase therapists’ efficiency and effectiveness by alleviating labor-intensive aspects of physical rehabilitation [2], [3], i.”
BackgroundChanging Motor Synergies in Chronic Stroke
Dipietro, L., Krebs, H. I., Fasoli, S. E., Volpe, B. T., Stein, J. M., Bever, C. T., & Hogan, N. (2007) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.01295.2006 · Cited by 263
“Graying of the population will increase the prevalence of stroke and has prompted the development of robotic tools for delivering movement therapy (Krebs et al. 1998; Lum et al. 2002; Reinkesmeyer et al. 2000), evaluating patients’ progress, and augmenting our understanding of the process of neuro-recovery (Krebs et a…”
Lang, C. E., MacDonald, J. R., & Gnip, C. (2007) · Neurology Report · doi:10.1097/01.npt.0000260568.31746.34 · Cited by 265
Surface EMG pattern recognition for real-time control of a wrist exoskeleton
Khokhar, Z. O., Xiao, Z. G., & Menon, C. (2010) · BioMedical Engineering OnLine · doi:10.1186/1475-925x-9-41 · Cited by 257
“Combining sEMG signals with robotic therapy can optimize the coordination of motor commands and actual movement [4-6].”
BackgroundVolpe, B. T., Lynch, D., Rykman, A., Ferraro, M., Galgano, M. A., Hogan, N., & Krebs, H. I. (2008) · Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · doi:10.1177/1545968307311102 · Cited by 259
“These emerging data have stimulated the clinical development of activity-based techniques based on a combination of the control of guidance and speed of the movements and intensive practice.(14-19) In patients with chronic stroke referred to an outpatient clinic, we have attempted to establish a standard therapistdeli…”
MethodBilateral arm training: Why and who benefits?
Waller, S. M., & Whitall, J. (2008) · Neurorehabilitation · doi:10.3233/nre-2008-23104 · Cited by 253
“compared MIME training (using both unimanual and bimanual modes) to a standard neurodevelopmental therapeutic training approach in 27 subjects with moderate severity paresis [35].”
MethodAdvances in upper limb stroke rehabilitation: a technology push
Loureiro, R. C. V., Harwin, W., Nagai, K., & Johnson, M. J. (2011) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-011-0797-0 · Cited by 256
“the MIT-MANUS [27] and MIME studies [66, 67].”
Alia, C., Spalletti, C., Lai, S., Panarese, A., Lamola, G., Bertolucci, F., Vallone, F., Garbo, A. D., Chisari, C., Micera, S., et al. (2017) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2017.00076 · Cited by 272
Sivan, M., O’Connor, R. J., Makower, S., Levesley, M. C., & Bhakta, B. (2011) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.2340/16501977-0674 · Cited by 248
Robot-aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke
Ferraro, M., Palazzolo, J. J., Krol, J., Krebs, H. I., Hogan, N., & Volpe, B. T. (2003) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000095963.00970.68 · Cited by 242
Ang, K. K., Guan, C., Chua, K. S. G., Ang, B. T., Kuah, C. W. K., Wang, C., Phua, K. S., Chin, Z. Y., & Zhang, H. (2010) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/iembs.2010.5626782 · Cited by 241
“Recent rehabilitation using robots alleviates the labor-intensive aspects of physical rehabilitation by human therapists [17], and a study has shown that robots deliver effective movement therapy [18].”
BackgroundCustomized interactive robotic treatment for stroke: EMG-triggered therapy
Dipietro, L., Ferraro, M., Palazzolo, J. J., Krebs, H. I., Volpe, B. T., & Hogan, N. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2005.850423 · Cited by 241
Constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremities in people with stroke
Corbetta, D., Sirtori, V., Castellini, G., Moja, L., & Gatti, R. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004433.pub3 · Cited by 248
Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke: follow-up results
Fasoli, S. E., Krebs, H. I., Stein, J. M., Frontera, W. R., Hughes, R. L., & Hogan, N. (2004) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2003.11.028 · Cited by 239
Pang, M. Y. C., Harris, J. E., & Eng, J. J. (2006) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.113 · Cited by 232
McCabe, J., Monkiewicz, M., Holcomb, J. P., Pundik, S., & Daly, J. J. (2014) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.022 · Cited by 227
“In contrast with these inaccurate beliefs, our results are consistent with others who have demonstrated the possibility of motor recovery beyond that time period, through the application of a variety of treatment methods.(3,4,13-17,19,40,43,46-57)”
ResultMehrholz, J., Platz, T., Kügler, J., & Pohl, M. (2008) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006876.pub2 · Cited by 224
A Review of Active Hand Exoskeletons for Rehabilitation and Assistance
du Plessis, T., Djouani, K., & Oosthuizen, C. C. (2021) · Robotics · doi:10.3390/robotics10010040 · Cited by 221
“that highly repetitive task training can help the recovery of motor functions [10,11].”
BackgroundLum, P. S., Reinkensmeyer, D. J., Mahoney, R. M., Rymer, W. Z., & Burgar, C. G. (2002) · Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation · doi:10.1310/9kfm-kf81-p9a4-5ww0 · Cited by 218
ARMin II - 7 DoF rehabilitation robot: mechanics and kinematics
Mihelj, M., Nef, T., & Riener, R. (2007) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/robot.2007.364112 · Cited by 215
“Several studies prove that arm therapy has positive effects on the rehabilitation progress of stroke patients (see [1], [2], [3], [4] and [5] for review).”
BackgroundA Review on the Relationship Between Sound and Movement in Sports and Rehabilitation
Schaffert, N., Janzen, T. B., Mattes, K., & Thaut, M. H. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00244 · Cited by 222
Cui, X., Chen, W., Jin, X. H., & Agrawal, S. K. (2016) · IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · doi:10.1109/tmech.2016.2618888 · Cited by 205
“Research performed with robotic training devices, introduced during the last two decades, show that these devices are effective in motor rehabilitation and can potentially reduce the expense of treatment [2].”
BackgroundConstraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremities in stroke patients
Sirtori, V., Corbetta, D., Moja, L., & Gatti, R. (2009) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004433.pub2 · Cited by 206
Comparison of Two Techniques of Robot-Aided Upper Limb Exercise Training After Stroke
Stein, J. M., Krebs, H. I., Frontera, W. R., Fasoli, S. E., Hughes, R. L., & Hogan, N. (2004) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/01.phm.0000137313.14480.ce · Cited by 202
“More recently, improved motor function in the limb segments exercised after robot-aided exercise has been shown in individuals with chronic stable deficits after stroke.(19,20) Robot-aided exercise can be provided using a variety of treatment paradigms, including passive movements, active assistive exercises, resistiv…”
BackgroundA Review on Upper Limb Rehabilitation Robots
Qassim, H. M., & Hasan, W. Z. W. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10196976 · Cited by 204
“[38] MIME Assistive >6 months 27 24 sessions 8 weeks 1 h/workday the reach ability and the proximal arm strength were largely improved”
BackgroundInfluentialSheean, G. L., Lannin, N. A., Turner‐Stokes, L. F., Rawicki, B., & Snow, B. J. (2010) · European Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03129.x · Cited by 198
Sprouting, regeneration and circuit formation in the injured spinal cord: factors and activity
Maier, I. C., & Schwab, M. E. (2006) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1890 · Cited by 197
“Good success was also achieved through forelimb training with robots that do not require immobilization of the other arm (Lum et al. 2002a,b; Fasoli et al. 2003; Ferraro et al. 2003; Riener et al. 2005).”
BackgroundFischer, H. C., Stubblefield, K. A., Kline, T., Luo, X., Kenyon, R. V., & Kamper, D. G. (2007) · Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation · doi:10.1310/tsr1401-1 · Cited by 194
Telerehabilitation Research: Emerging Opportunities
Winters, J. M. (2002) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.4.112801.121923 · Cited by 199
Burgar, C. G., Lum, P. S., Scremin, A. M. E., Garber, S. L., der Loos, H. F. M. V., Kenney, D. E., & Shor, P. C. (2011) · The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development · doi:10.1682/jrrd.2010.04.0062 · Cited by 192
“Our first clinical trial enrolled chronic stroke subjects (>6 months poststroke) and compared the results from equal amounts of RA and conventional therapy delivered during 24 sessions over 8 weeks [4–6].”
ResultBabaiasl, M., Mahdioun, S. H., Jaryani, P., & Yazdani, M. (2015) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.3109/17483107.2014.1002539 · Cited by 195
“In two RCTs, it was shown that MIME can improve impairment and muscle activation in sub-acute and chronic stroke patients [52,53].”
BackgroundResultStaubli, P., Nef, T., Klamroth-Marganska, V., & Riener, R. (2009) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-6-46 · Cited by 183
Control Strategies for Patient-Assisted Training Using the Ankle Rehabilitation Robot (ARBOT)
Saglia, J. A., Tsagarakis, N. G., Dai, J. S., & Caldwell, D. G. (2012) · IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · doi:10.1109/tmech.2012.2214228 · Cited by 181
Ju, M., Lin, C. K., Lin, D.-H., Hwang, I.-S., & Chen, S. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2005.847354 · Cited by 180
“An alternative approach was adopted in the active-constrained mode of mirror image movement enabler (MIME) system [8], [9].”
MethodInfluentialKutner, N. G., Zhang, R. V., Butler, A. J., Wolf, S. L., & Alberts, J. L. (2010) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20090160 · Cited by 179
Response to upper-limb robotics and functional neuromuscular
Daly, J. J., Hogan, N., Perepezko, E., Krebs, H. I., Rogers, J. M., Goyal, K. S., Dohring, M. E., Fredrickson, E., Nethery, J., & Ruff, R. L. (2005) · The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development · doi:10.1682/jrrd.2005.02.0048 · Cited by 179
“Others showed that robotics could produce impairment gains [1–2] and delayed gains in the FIM [4], a measure of gross function that does not focus on motor ability of the involved upper limb.”
BackgroundMethodA Framework to Describe, Analyze and Generate Interactive Motor Behaviors
Jarrassé, N., Charalambous, T., & Burdet, E. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049945 · Cited by 176
“Even if the ‘‘passive mode’’ used in first stage, where the arm is moved by the robot, is similar to an assistance scheme, the ‘‘active mode’’ in which robot is only correcting patient movements ‘‘just-as-needed’’ is similar to an education scheme [41,42,63,64].”
Brain–machine interfaces: computational demands and clinical needs meet basic neuroscience
Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. (2003) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(03)00121-8 · Cited by 176
Wu, C., Huang, P.-C., Chen, Y., Lin, K., & Yang, H.-W. (2013) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.02.007 · Cited by 173
Noninvasive brain stimulation in stroke rehabilitation
Webster, B. R., Celnik, P., & Cohen, L. (2006) · NeuroRx · doi:10.1016/j.nurx.2006.07.008 · Cited by 168
Metadata
- Authors
- Lum, P. S., Burgar, C. G., Shor, P. C., Majmundar, M., & Van der Loos, M.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- ORCID
- Lum, Peter S.
- Venue
- Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 952-959
- ISSN
- 0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2113585314
- Cited by
- 1,159
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 55
- FWCI
- 28.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Keywords
- stroke rehabilitation, upper limb motor function, hemiparesis, neurodevelopmental treatment, Fugl-Meyer Assessment, FIM, arm muscle strength, reaching kinematics, chronic stroke
- MeSH terms
- Stroke Rehabilitation, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Arm, Biomechanical Phenomena, Chronic Disease, Feedback, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Muscle Contraction, Paresis, Robotics, Stress, Mechanical, Motion Therapy, Continuous Passive, Range of Motion, Articular, Treatment Outcome, Sample Size, Stroke
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
