Cited by 137Dialysis and Renal Disease ManagementCardiac Health and Mental HealthMental Health Treatment and Access

Physician-Diagnosed Depression as a Correlate of Hospitalizations in Patients Receiving Long-Term Hemodialysis

Hedayati, S. Susan, Grambow, Steven C., Szczech, Lynda A., Stechuchak, Karen M., Allen, Andrew S., Bosworth, Hayden B.·2005·American Journal of Kidney Diseases

Abstract

Background Hospital admissions consume a large proportion of costs for the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) program in the United States. We investigated whether a physician diagnosis of depression increases the risk for hospitalization or death in patients with ESRD receiving long-term hemodialysis (HD), independent of medical comorbidities. Methods Centralized Veterans Affairs (VA) databases were used to identify a population-based prevalence cohort of 1,588 male patients with ESRD receiving long-term HD in VA facilities between September 1, 2000, and September 30, 2000. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes were used to identify comorbidities and depression diagnosis. Negative binomial regression models were used to examine the association between depression diagnosis and number of hospitalizations and cumulative hospital days in a 2-year observation period. Logistic regression models were used to investigate the association between depression diagnosis and hospitalization, death, and death or hospitalization. Results The prevalence of physician-diagnosed depression was 14.7%. Patients with a depression diagnosis were more likely to be white and have more comorbidities. Depression diagnosis was associated with increased hospital days (rate ratio for adjusted model, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 1.66) and increased number of hospitalizations (rate ratio for adjusted model, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.11 to 1.52). Depression diagnosis wa…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.07.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hedayati, S. S., Grambow, S. C., Szczech, L. A., Stechuchak, K. M., Allen, A. S., & Bosworth, H. B.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Hedayati, S. Susan
Venue
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-10
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
642-649
ISSN
0272-6386 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011956449
Cited by
137
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Kidney Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL070713)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK02724-01A1, K23DK002724)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
depression, end-stage renal disease, hemodialysis, hospitalization, length of hospital stay, mortality, veterans, comorbidities, depression prevalence, hospital costs
MeSH terms
Aged, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Ethnicity, Renal Dialysis, Hospitalization, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Outpatients, Retrospective Studies, Risk, Time Factors, United States, Veterans, Cohort Studies, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review