Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 998

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research

Open access
Sperber, Ami D·2004·Gastroenterology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.016

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Reilly, 2000, Validation of a questionnaire to assess fecal incontinence and associated risk factors, Dis Colon Rectum, 43, 146, 10.1007/BF02236971 · DOI
  2. Rockwood, 1999, Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence, Dis Colon Rectum, 42, 1525, 10.1007/BF02236199 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Blaivas, 1997, Standards of efficacy for evaluation of treatment outcomes in urinary incontinence, Neurourol Urodyn, 16, 145, 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6777(1997)16:3<145::AID-NAU2>3.0.CO;2-E · DOI · Paper page
  4. Rockwood, 2000, Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale, Dis Colon Rectum, 43, 9, 10.1007/BF02237236 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Lee, 1995, Measuring the psychosocial impact of urinary incontinence. The York Incontinence Perception Scale (YIPS), J Am Geriatr Soc, 43, 1275, 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb07406.x · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb07406.x
  6. Shumaker, 1994, Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program (CPW) in Women (CPW) Research Group, Qual Life Res, 3, 291, 10.1007/BF00451721 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Visnes, 2000, A Norwegian version of the Incontinence Stress Questionnaire-Staff Reaction, J Nurs Manag, 8, 71
  8. Patrick, 1999, Cultural adaptation of a quality-of-life measure for urinary incontinence, Eur Urol, 36, 427, 10.1159/000020026 · doi:10.1159/000020026
  9. Badia Llach, 2000, Validity of the King’s Health questionnaire in the assessment of quality of life of patients with urinary incontinence. The King’s Group, Med Clin (Barc), 114, 647, 10.1016/S0025-7753(00)71390-X · DOI
  10. Jones, 2001, An adaptation of Brislin’s translation model for cross-cultural research, Nurs Res, 50, 300, 10.1097/00006199-200109000-00008 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Diaz-Loving, 1998, Contributions of Mexican ethnopsychology to the resolution of the etic-emic dilemma in personality, J Cross-Cult Psychol, 29, 104, 10.1177/0022022198291006 · DOI
  12. Levenstein, 2001, Cross-cultural variation in disease-related concerns among patients with inflammatory bowel disease, Am J Gastroenterol, 96, 1822, 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03878.x · DOI
  13. Bontempo, 1993, Translation fidelity of psychological scales, J Cross-Cult Psychol, 24, 149, 10.1177/0022022193242002 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Sperber, 1994, Cross-cultural translation, J Cross-Cult Psychol, 25, 501, 10.1177/0022022194254006 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 998

Metadata

Authors
Sperber, A. D.
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-01
Volume
126
Issue
1 Suppl 1
Pages
S124-S128
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156212565
Cited by
998
References
0
FWCI
40.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.016
The paper
Sperber, A. D. (2004). Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research. Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.016

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.