Cited by 1,211Sleep and related disordersObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Pittsburgh sleep quality index

Open access
Bertolazi, Alessandra Naimaier, Fagondes, Simone Chaves, Hoff, Leonardo Santos, Dartora, Eduardo Giacomolli, da Silva Miozzo, Ilsis Cristine, de Barba, Maria Emília Ferreira, Menna Barreto, Sérgio Saldanha·2011·Sleep Medicine

Abstract

Introduction The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a questionnaire that assesses sleep quality and disturbances over a 1-month period. It is a valuable tool for research purposes. The aim of this study was to validate a Brazilian Portuguese version of the PSQI.Methods The Brazilian Portuguese version (PSQI-BR) was developed according to the following steps: (a) translation, (b) back-translation, (c) comparison between translation and back-translation performed by a group of experts, and (d) pretest in bilingual individuals. Between January 2006 and September 2007, the PSQI-BR was applied to a group of consecutive patients who were submitted to overnight polysomnography with clinical suspicion of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) or insomnia. As in the original article, a group of patients with depression and a control group were included. The depression group was composed of patients from the Mood Disorders Unit of the Psychiatry Department of Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Brazil. The control group was composed of subjects with a history of normal sleep habits, without noticed snoring.Results A total of 83 patients and 21 controls completed the questionnaire and were submitted to overnight polysomnography. The seven-component scores of the PSQI-BR had an overall reliability coefficient (Cronbach's α) of 0.82, indicating a high degree of internal consistency. The groups included 43 patients with OSAS, 21 with insomnia, 19 with depression and 21 controls. The mean (±SD) PSQI-BR score was 8.1±4.0 for patients with OSAS, 12.8±3.7 for insomnia patients, 14.5±3.7 for those with depression and 2.5±2.0 for control subjects. The one-way ANOVA demonstrated significant differences in PSQI-BR scores across the four diagnostic groups (p<0.001). Post hoc tests between paired groups showed that scores for OSAS, depression and insomnia were significantly higher than for controls (p<0.05). PSQI-BR scores for insomnia did not differ from those obtained for depression (p>0.05), but both were higher than for OSAS (p<0.05).Conclusions The results of the present study demonstrate that the PSQI-BR is a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of sleep quality and equivalent to its original version when applied to individuals who speak the Brazilian Portuguese language. Despite relevant influences of language and cultural background, no major cultural adaptations were necessary during the validation process. The PSQI-BR can be a tool either for clinical management or research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sleep.2010.04.020

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bertolazi, A. N., Fagondes, S. C., Hoff, L. S., Dartora, E. G., da Silva Miozzo, I. C., de Barba, M. E. F., & Menna Barreto, S. S.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
Corresponding author
Bertolazi, Alessandra Naimaier
Venue
Sleep Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
70-75
ISSN
1389-9457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046261074
Cited by
1,211
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 99 · 2025: 116 · 2024: 160 · 2023: 159 · 2022: 148 · 2021: 128 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 13
FWCI
14.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lume (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Brazilian Portuguese translation, sleep quality assessment, sleep disorders, obstructive sleep apnea, insomnia, depression, questionnaire validation, psychometric properties, cross-cultural adaptation, polysomnography, internal consistency, cross-cultural equivalence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Brazil, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Sleep Wake Disorders, Translating, Reproducibility of Results, Polysomnography, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review