Cited by 846Health Education and ValidationPsychometric Methodologies and TestingCultural Competency in Health Care

An Adaptation of Brislin???s Translation Model for Cross-cultural Research

Jones, Patricia S., Lee, Jerry W., Phillips, Linda R., Zhang, Xinwei E., Jaceldo, Karen B.·2001·Nursing Research

Abstract

Background The number of nurse scientists pursuing cross-cultural research using quantitative designs is increasing. Preparation of instruments that are conceptually and functionally appropriate in the language of the participants is a complex process that needs examination. Objectives Brislin's classic model for translation and validation of instruments for cross-cultural research is critiqued. Adaptations and extensions of that model are recommended. Methods Brislin's model guided tool preparation in a cross-cultural investigation. The process is described and lessons learned are outlined and discussed. Conclusions Steps toward a more efficient and valid approach to the preparation of instruments are suggested.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006199-200109000-00008

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, P. S., Lee, J. W., Phillips, L. R., Zhang, X. E., & Jaceldo, K. B.
Affiliations
  • Loma Linda University (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Venue
Nursing Research
Published
2001-09
Volume
50
Issue
5
Pages
300-304
ISSN
0029-6562 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041205720
Cited by
846
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 41
FWCI
27.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nursing Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r29nr003056-05)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (R29 NR03056)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
Keywords
cross-cultural research, instrument translation, instrument validation, cross-cultural adaptation, nursing research instruments, translation and back-translation
MeSH terms
Asian, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Humans, Models, Psychological, Translating, Women, Reproducibility of Results, Nursing Methodology Research, Transcultural Nursing, Caregivers, Cultural Diversity, Multilingualism, Knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review