Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 354

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence and Burden of Fecal Incontinence: A Population-Based Study in Women

Bharucha, Adil E., Zinsmeister, Alan R., Locke, G. Richard, Seide, Barbara M., McKeon, Kimberly, Schleck, Cathy D., Melton, L. Joseph·2005·Gastroenterology
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.04.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.04.006

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Bharucha, 2003, Fecal incontinence, Gastroenterology, 124, 1672, 10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00329-9 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Norton, 2004, The perspective of the patient, Gastroenterology, 126, S175, 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.081 · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.081
  3. Miner, 2004, Economic and personal impact of fecal and urinary incontinence, Gastroenterology, 126, S8, 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.056 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Nelson, 1998, Fecal incontinence in Wisconsin nursing homes, Dis Colon Rectum, 41, 1226, 10.1007/BF02258218 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Leigh, 1982, Faecal incontinence, Lancet, 1, 1349, 10.1016/S0140-6736(82)92413-8 · DOI
  6. Nelson, 2004, Epidemiology of fecal incontinence, Gastroenterology, 126, S3, 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.010 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Nelson, 1995, Community-based prevalence of anal incontinence, JAMA, 274, 559, 10.1001/jama.274.7.559 · DOI
  8. Lam, 1999, Prevalence of faecal incontinence, Colorectal Dis, 1, 197, 10.1046/j.1463-1318.1999.00044.x · DOI
  9. Kalantar, 2002, Prevalence of faecal incontinence and associated risk factors; an underdiagnosed problem in the Australian community?, Med J Aust, 176, 54, 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04283.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. Sultan, 1994, Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears, Br Med J, 308, 887, 10.1136/bmj.308.6933.887 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Bharucha, 2004, A new questionnaire for constipation and fecal incontinence, Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 20, 355, 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02028.x · DOI
  12. Whitehead, 2001, Treatment options for fecal incontinence, Dis Colon Rectum, 44, 131, 10.1007/BF02234835 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Attanasio, 1984, Psychometric properties of the SUNYA revision of the Psychosomatic Symptom Checklist, J Behav Med, 7, 247, 10.1007/BF00845390 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Perry, 2002, Prevalence of faecal incontinence in adults aged 40 years or more living in the community, Gut, 50, 480, 10.1136/gut.50.4.480 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Roberts, 1999, Prevalence of combined fecal and urinary incontinence, J Am Geriatr Soc, 47, 837, 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb03841.x · DOI · Paper page
  16. Reilly, 1996, Fecal incontinence, Gastroenterology, 110, A743
  17. O’Boyle, 2002, Informed consent and birth, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 981, 10.1067/mob.2002.128085 · DOI
  18. Kamm, 1994, Obstetric damage and faecal incontinence, Lancet, 344, 730, 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)92213-6 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(94)92213-6
  19. Pescatori, 1992, New grading and scoring for anal incontinence. Evaluation of 335 patients, Dis Colon Rectum, 35, 482, 10.1007/BF02049407 · doi:10.1007/bf02049407
  20. Vaizey, 1999, Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems, Gut, 44, 77, 10.1136/gut.44.1.77 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Rockwood, 1999, Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence, Dis Colon Rectum, 42, 1525, 10.1007/BF02236199 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Edwards, 2001, The prevalence of faecal incontinence in older people living at home, Age Ageing, 30, 503, 10.1093/ageing/30.6.503 · doi:10.1093/ageing/30.6.503
  23. Rockwood, 2000, Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale, Dis Colon Rectum, 43, 9, 10.1007/BF02237236 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Koloski, 2003, Predictors of conventional and alternative health care seeking for irritable bowel syndrome and functional dyspepsia, Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 17, 841, 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01498.x · DOI
  25. Locke, 2000, Helicobacter pylori and dyspepsia, Am J Gastroenterol, 95, 1906, 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02251.x · DOI
  26. Redfield, 2003, Burden of systolic and diastolic ventricular dysfunction in the community, JAMA, 289, 194, 10.1001/jama.289.2.194 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Jacobsen, 2004, Participation bias in a population-based echocardiography study, Ann Epidemiol, 14, 579, 10.1016/j.annepidem.2003.11.001 · DOI
  28. Kinchen, 2003, Factors associated with women’s decisions to seek treatment for urinary incontinence, J Womens Health, 12, 687, 10.1089/154099903322404339 · doi:10.1089/154099903322404339
  29. Whitehead, 2004, Advancing the treatment of fecal and urinary incontinence through research, Gastroenterology, 126, S1, 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.055 · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.055

Cited by

See all 354

Metadata

Authors
Bharucha, A. E., Zinsmeister, A. R., Locke, G. R., Seide, B. M., McKeon, K., Schleck, C. D., & Melton, L. J.
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-07
Volume
129
Issue
1
Pages
42-49
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1053/j.gastro.2005.04.006
OpenAlex
W2067285295
Cited by
354
References
3
FWCI
9.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence and Burden of Fecal Incontinence: A Population-Based Study in Women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/j.gastro.2005.04.006
The paper
Bharucha, A. E., Zinsmeister, A. R., Locke, G. R., Seide, B. M., McKeon, K., Schleck, C. D., & Melton, L. J. (2005). Prevalence and Burden of Fecal Incontinence: A Population-Based Study in Women. Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2005.04.006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.