Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 386

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Molecular Signature to Discriminate Dysplastic Nodules From Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma in HCV Cirrhosis

Open access
Llovet, Josep M., Chen, Yingbei, Wurmbach, Elisa, Roayaie, Sasan, Fiel, M. Isabel, Schwartz, Myron, Thung, Swan N., Khitrov, Gregory, Zhang, Weijia, Villanueva, Augusto, Battiston, Carlo, Mazzaferro, Vincenzo, Bruix, Jordi, Waxman, Samuel, Friedman, Scott L.·2006·Gastroenterology

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Small liver nodules approximately 2 cm are difficult to characterize by radiologic or pathologic examination. Our aim was to identify a molecular signature to diagnose early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: The transcriptional profiles of 55 candidate genes were assessed by quantitative real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in 17 dysplastic nodules (diameter, 10 mm) and 20 early HCC (diameter, 18 mm) from HCV cirrhotic patients undergoing resection/transplantation and 10 nontumoral cirrhotic tissues and 10 normal liver tissues. Candidate genes were confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR in 20 advanced HCCs and by immunohistochemistry in 75 samples and validated in an independent set of 29 samples (dysplastic nodules [10] and small HCC [19; diameter, 20 mm]). RESULTS: Twelve genes were significantly, differentially expressed in early HCCs compared with dysplastic nodules (>2-fold change; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve > or =0.8): this included TERT, GPC3, gankyrin, survivin, TOP2A, LYVE1, E-cadherin, IGFBP3, PDGFRA, TGFA, cyclin D1, and HGF. Logistic regression analysis identified a 3-gene set including GPC3 (18-fold increase in HCC, P = .01), LYVE1 (12-fold decrease in HCC, P = .0001), and survivin (2.2-fold increase in HCC, P = .02), which had a discriminative accuracy of 94%. The validity of the gene signature was confirmed in a prospective testing set. GPC3 immunostaining was positive in all HCCs and negative in dysplastic nodules (22/22 vs 0/14, respectively, P < .001). Nuclear staining for survivin was positive in 12 of 13 advanced HCC cases and in 1 of 9 early tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular data based on gene transcriptional profiles of a 3-gene set allow a reliable diagnosis of early HCC. Immunostaining of GPC3 confirms the diagnosis of HCC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.09.014

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Cited by

See all 386

Metadata

Authors
Llovet, J. M., Chen, Y., Wurmbach, E., Roayaie, S., Fiel, M. I., Schwartz, M., Thung, S. N., Khitrov, G., Zhang, W., Villanueva, A., Battiston, C., Mazzaferro, V., Bruix, J., Waxman, S., & Friedman, S. L.
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-12
Volume
131
Issue
6
Pages
1758-1767
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065589690
Cited by
386
References
39
FWCI
20.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Molecular Signature to Discriminate Dysplastic Nodules From Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma in HCV Cirrhosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/j.gastro.2006.09.014
The paper
Llovet, J. M., Chen, Y., Wurmbach, E., Roayaie, S., Fiel, M. I., Schwartz, M., Thung, S. N., Khitrov, G., Zhang, W., Villanueva, A., Battiston, C., Mazzaferro, V., Bruix, J., Waxman, S., & Friedman, S. L. (2006). A Molecular Signature to Discriminate Dysplastic Nodules From Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma in HCV Cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2006.09.014

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.