Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 852

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Real‐time identification of liver cancers by using indocyanine green fluorescent imaging

Ishizawa, Takeaki, Fukushima, Noriyoshi, Shibahara, Junji, Masuda, Koichi, Tamura, Sumihito, Aoki, Taku, Hasegawa, Kiyoshi, Beck, Yoshifumi, Fukayama, Masashi, Kokudo, Norihiro·2009·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We have often encountered difficulties in identifying small liver cancers during surgery. Fluorescent imaging using indocyanine green (ICG) has the potential to detect liver cancers through the visualization of the disordered biliary excretion of ICG in cancer tissues and noncancerous liver tissues compressed by the tumor. METHODS: ICG had been intravenously injected for a routine liver function test in 37 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and 12 patients with metastasis of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) before liver resection. Surgical specimens were investigated using a near‐infrared light camera system. Among the 49 subjects, the 26 patients examined during the latter period of the study (20 with HCC and 6 with metastasis) underwent ICG‐fluorescent imaging of the liver surfaces before resection. RESULTS: ICG‐fluorescent imaging identified all of the microscopically confirmed HCCs (n = 63) and CRC metastases (n = 28) in surgical specimens. Among the 63 HCCs, 8 tumors (13%, including 5 early HCCs) were not evident grossly unless observed by ICG‐fluorescent imaging. Five false‐positive nodules (4 large regenerative nodules and 1 bile duct proliferation) were identified among the fluorescent lesions. Well‐differentiated HCCs appeared as uniformly fluorescing lesions with higher lesion‐to‐liver contrast than that of moderately or poorly differentiated HCCs (162.6 [71.1‐218.2] per pixel vs 67.7 [‐6.3‐211.2] per pixel, P < .001), while CRC metastases were delineated as rim‐fluorescing lesions. Fluorescent microscopy confirmed that fluorescence originated in the cytoplasm and pseudoglands of HCC cells and in the noncancerous liver parenchyma surrounding metastases. ICG‐fluorescent imaging before resection identified 21 of the 41 HCCs (51%) and all of the 16 metastases that were examined. CONCLUSIONS: ICG‐fluorescent imaging enables the highly sensitive identification of small and grossly unidentifiable liver cancers in real time, enhancing the accuracy of liver resection and operative staging. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.24291

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

See all 852

Metadata

Authors
Ishizawa, T., Fukushima, N., Shibahara, J., Masuda, K., Tamura, S., Aoki, T., Hasegawa, K., Beck, Y., Fukayama, M., & Kokudo, N.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-05-20
Volume
115
Issue
11
Pages
2491-2504
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2059931622
Cited by
852
References
16
FWCI
12.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Real‐time identification of liver cancers by using indocyanine green fluorescent imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.24291
The paper
Ishizawa, T., Fukushima, N., Shibahara, J., Masuda, K., Tamura, S., Aoki, T., Hasegawa, K., Beck, Y., Fukayama, M., & Kokudo, N. (2009). Real‐time identification of liver cancers by using indocyanine green fluorescent imaging. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24291

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.