The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative Meta-analysis Identifies Brain Regions Activated During Rectal Distension in Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Open accessAbstract
Background and aims The responsiveness of the central nervous system is altered in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). However, because of variations in experimental paradigms, analytic techniques, and reporting practices, little consensus exists on brain responses to visceral stimulation. We aimed to identify brain regions consistently activated by supraliminal rectal stimulation in IBS patients and healthy subjects (controls) by performing a quantitative meta-analysis of published studies. Methods Significant foci from within-group statistical parametric maps were extracted from published neuroimaging studies that employed rectal distension. Voxel-based activation likelihood estimation was applied, pooling the results and comparing them across groups. Results Across studies, there was consistent activation in regions associated with visceral afferent processing (ie, thalamus, insula, anterior midcingulate) among IBS patients and controls, but considerable differences in the extent and specific location of foci. IBS patients differed from controls in that there were more consistent activations in regions associated with emotional arousal (pregenual anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala) and activation of a midbrain cluster, a region playing a role in endogenous pain modulation. Controls showed more consistent activation of the medial and lateral prefrontal cortex. Conclusions Patients with IBS have greater engagement of regions associated with emotional arousal and endogenous pain modulation, but similar activation of regions involved in processing of visceral afferent information. Controls have greater engagement of cognitive modulatory regions. These results support a role for central nervous system dysregulation in IBS. These findings provide specific targets for guiding development of future neuroimaging protocols to more clearly define altered brain-gut interactions in IBS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Disordered motility in IBS is manifested by abnormal colonic myoelectric activity, 28 repetitive contractions of the small intestine and colon, associated with abdominal pain, and alterations in gastrointestinal or colonic transit. 29,30”
From Irritable bowel syndrome (2020) · cites this paper as [30]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci
Yudofsky, S. C., & Hales, R. E. (1992) · The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1176/jnp.4.4.359 · Cited by 3,818
Contributions of the Amygdala to Emotion Processing: From Animal Models to Human Behavior
Phelps, E. A., & LeDoux, J. E. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.09.025 · Cited by 3,203
Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body
(Bud) Craig, A. (2003) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(03)00090-4 · Cited by 2,556
On the relationship between emotion and cognition
Pessoa, L. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2317 · Cited by 2,350
Ochsner, K. N., Ray, R. D., Cooper, J. C., Robertson, E. R., Chopra, S., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Gross, J. J. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.06.030 · Cited by 2,113
Eickhoff, S. B., Laird, A. R., Grefkes, C., Wang, L. E., Zilles, K., & Fox, P. T. (2009) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20718 · Cited by 1,924
Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic
Nichols, T. E., Brett, M., Andersson, J., Wager, T. D., & Poline, J. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.005 · Cited by 1,854
Pain and emotion interactions in subregions of the cingulate gyrus
Vogt, B. A. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1704 · Cited by 1,810
The activation of attentional networks
FAN, J., MCCANDLISS, B., FOSSELLA, J., FLOMBAUM, J., & POSNER, M. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.004 · Cited by 1,737
Meta-analysis of the functional neuroanatomy of single-word reading: method and validation
Turkeltaub, P. E., Eden, G. F., Jones, K. M., & Zeffiro, T. A. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1131 · Cited by 1,604
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Global Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Meta-analysis
Lovell, R. M., & Ford, A. C. (2012) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2012.02.029 · Cited by 2,155
Irritable bowel syndrome: a clinical review.
Chey, W., Kurlander, J. E., & Eswaran, S. (2015) · Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) · doi:10.1001/jama.2015.0954 · Cited by 748
The microbiota-gut-brain axis: from motility to mood
Margolis, K. G., Cryan, J. F., & Mayer, E. A. (2021) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.10.066 · Cited by 999
Self-citationFord, A. C., Sperber, A. D., Corsetti, M., & Camilleri, M. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31548-8 · Cited by 818
Pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome
Holtmann, G. J., Ford, A. C., & Talley, N. J. (2016) · The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(16)30023-1 · Cited by 590
Metadata
- Authors
- Tillisch, K., Mayer, E. A., & Labus, J. S.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Venue
- Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-100
- ISSN
- 0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3253553
- OpenAlex
- W2064638321
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 3.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (DK 64530, K08 DK, AT 00268, NIH P50, DK 48351)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-48351, K08DK071626, R01DK048351, K23DK073451, P50DK064539, P50 DK 64530)
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R24AT002681, R24 AT00268)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Health and Development
- Keywords
- irritable bowel syndrome, rectal distension, brain-gut interaction, visceral pain, emotional arousal, endogenous pain modulation, prefrontal cortex, amygdala, anterior cingulate cortex, thalamus, insula, neuroimaging
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Male, Pain, Rectum, Models, Statistical, Irritable Bowel Syndrome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
