Cited by 311Liver Disease and TransplantationAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment

Underestimation of liver‐related mortality in the United States

Open access
Asrani, Sumeet K., Larson, Joseph J., Yawn, Barbara, Therneau, Terry M., Kim, W. Ray·2013·Gastroenterology

Abstract

Background & aims According to the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), chronic liver disease and cirrhosis is the 12(th) leading cause of death in the United States. However, this single descriptor might not adequately enumerate all deaths from liver disease. The aim of our study was to update data on liver mortality in the United States.Methods Mortality data were obtained from the Rochester Epidemiology Project (1999-2008) and the National Death Registry (1979-2008). Liver-specific mortality values were calculated. In contrast to the narrow NCHS definition, updated liver-related causes of death included other specific liver diagnoses (eg, hepatorenal syndrome), viral hepatitis, and hepatobiliary cancers.Results The Rochester Epidemiology Project database contained information on 261 liver-related deaths, with an age- and sex-adjusted death rate of 27.0/100,000 persons (95% confidence interval: 23.7-30.3). Of these, only 71 deaths (27.2%) would have been captured by the NCHS definition. Of cases for which viral hepatitis or hepatobiliary cancer was the cause of death, 96.9% and 94.3% had liver-related immediate causes of death, respectively. In analysis of data from the National Death registry (2008), use of the updated definition increased liver mortality by >2-fold (from 11.7 to 25.7 deaths/100,000, respectively). Using NCHS definitions, liver-related deaths decreased from 18.9/100,000 in 1979 to 11.7/100,000 in 2008-a reduction of 38%. However, using the updated estimate, liver-related deaths were essentially unchanged from 1979 (25.8/100,000) to 2008 (25.7/100,000). Mortality burden was systematically underestimated among non-whites and persons of Hispanic ethnicity.Conclusions Based on analyses of the Rochester Epidemiology Project and National Death databases, liver-related mortality has been underestimated during the past 2 decades in the United States.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.04.005

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence to support integrated behavioral health for patients with chronic liver disease is limited.

    “However, evidence to support integrated behavioral health for patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) is limited.4”

    From A Behavioral Health Program for Alcohol Use Disorder, Substance Abuse, and Depression in Chronic Liver Disease (2019) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Discussion (page not provided) addresses underestimation of liver-related mortality and its implications for care, not the evidence for integrated behavioral health. Searches for integrated behavioral health and related mental-health terms found no passage assessing whether evidence for that approach in chronic liver disease is limited. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asrani, S. K., Larson, J. J., Yawn, B., Therneau, T. M., & Kim, W. R.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, W. Ray
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
145
Issue
2
Pages
375-382.e2
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079748214
Cited by
311
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 8
FWCI
16.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (K24DK-92336, R01DK-34238, T32 DK07198)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
liver-related mortality, chronic liver disease, liver cirrhosis, mortality underestimation, cause of death classification, viral hepatitis, hepatobiliary cancer, hepatorenal syndrome, racial and ethnic disparities, Rochester Epidemiology Project
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cause of Death, Female, Hepatic Encephalopathy, Hepatitis, Viral, Human, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Hepatorenal Syndrome, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Liver Diseases, Liver Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Minnesota, National Center for Health Statistics, U.S., United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review