Cited by 192Gastrointestinal motility and disordersInfant Health and DevelopmentInflammatory Bowel Disease

AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on the pharmacological management of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea

Open access
Lembo, Anthony, Sultan, Shahnaz, Chang, Lin, Heidelbaugh, Joel J., Smalley, Walter, Verne, G. Nicholas·2022·Gastroenterology

Abstract

Background & aims Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common functional gastrointestinal disorder associated with significant disease burden. This American Gastroenterological Association Guideline is intended to support practitioners in decisions about the use of medications for the pharmacological management of IBS with predominant diarrhea (IBS-D) and is an update of a prior technical review and guideline. Methods The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework was used to assess evidence and make recommendations. The technical review panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients and conducted an evidence review of the following agents: eluxadoline, rifaximin, alosetron, loperamide, tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and antispasmodics. The guideline panel reviewed the evidence and used the Evidence-to-Decision Framework to develop recommendations. Conclusions The panel agreed on 8 recommendations for the management of patients with IBS-D. The panel made conditional recommendations for eluxadoline, rifaximin, alosetron, (moderate certainty), loperamide (very low certainty), tricyclic antidepressants, and anstispasmodics (low certainty). The panel made a conditional recommendation against the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (low certainty).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.04.017

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some probiotics may be beneficial in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).

    “Some probiotics may be bene fi cial in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but differences in species and strains used, as well as endpoints reported, have hampered attempts to make speci fi c recommendations as to which should be preferred.”

    From Efficacy of Probiotics in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Limitations and Evidence Gaps section says that evidence on probiotics for IBS is insufficient and that larger, higher-quality studies are needed. It does not say that some probiotics may be beneficial; searching for probiotic strains, endpoints, and recommendations yielded no passage establishing that benefit. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, et al. Func- tional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 2006; 130:1480-1491.
  2. Lavö B, Stenstam M, Nielsen AL. Loperamide in treat- ment of irritable bowel syndrome-adouble-blind placebo controlled study. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1987; 130:77-80.
  3. Palsson OS, Whitehead WE, van Tilburg MA, et al. Rome IV diagnostic questionnaires and tables for in- vestigators and clinicians. Gastroenterology 2016; 150:1481-1491.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lembo, A., Sultan, S., Chang, L., Heidelbaugh, J. J., Smalley, W., & Verne, G. N.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-07
Volume
163
Issue
1
Pages
137-151
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283157307
Cited by
192
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 7
FWCI
29.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gastroenterology (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK099052, DK118959)
  • AbbVie
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Allergan
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Keywords
irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea, pharmacological management, eluxadoline, rifaximin, alosetron, loperamide, tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, antispasmodic agents, functional gastrointestinal disorders, drug recommendation
MeSH terms
Rifaximin, Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic, Diarrhea, Gastrointestinal Agents, Humans, Loperamide, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Irritable Bowel Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review